Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Developement of Indus river valley civilization
Developement of Indus river valley civilization
Mesopotamia and indus valley civilization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Developement of Indus river valley civilization
10th grade Advanced Placement World History II Summer Reading Assignment Since the last ice age, civilizations have progressed at different rates. Some developed literate societies with metal tools and innovative farming societies, while others developed illiterate hunting-gathering societies with improvised rock tools. But why has society advanced at such unlike proportions? This question, also known as Yali’s question, is the main focus of the book Guns, Germs, and Steel by Jared Diamond.
Have you ever thought that everything had to start somehow? Like where did the wheel come from, or how did we start writing? Many people take these inventions for granted or don’t care about who worked hard to create them. Without these inventions, we wouldn’t have cars, a written language, or certain rules. Around 3500 B.C., the first, ancient River Valley civilizations were Sumeria, Egypt, and China.
The parts that can be seen as logical are the evidences found the warfare would lead to less land and an increase in competition of resources. The portion I do not find agreeable is the details that the warfare actually happened and for the reasons why the wars happened. Diamond provides no first hand knowledge of this premise only a prediction based on conclusions from other societies. The fourth strand is climate change (Diamond). There is sufficient evidence of droughts that occurred during the span of this society but no evidence that this was the leading and final cause of the collapse.
During 600 BCE and 600 CE, many countries was going through a drastic change. When analyzing early civilizations, it’s evident there is similarities and differences. The Middle East, China, and Africa were among few countries that advanced during this aeon. All of these empires within the countries have risen and fallen, developing these civilizations to what we know of today.
The case of the collision of Cajamarca brings forth to light the differences between Old World and New World societies. Our human ancestors from the beginning survive as hunters-gatherers but that change 10,000 years ago as the Holocene period sought to shift into food production. It was a new lifestyle, one that began with the rise of the Natufian culture. In lecture 10, it stated that, “Natufians were foragers who lived by hunting and gathering, but they had settled down and lived in particular locations” (Love, 10). The Natufian culture has been linked to have trade networks, however, cultivation evidence was found in Levant.
In the early civilizations , government, economy, and the art culture was growing for developing countries. The Tigris and Euphrates River Valley was very similar and different from the famous Nile river valley in Egypt in many ways. Waging wars and causing trouble in paradise are not the only things that the Middle East is and was capable of. These two civilizations built the structure of autocracy, monarchy, and the artistic community, from hieroglyphics to pictographs these communities of people created things that we still use today to find out more of ancient history. The Persian chart by Ms.Dumelow’s 9th grade class explains the exact differences between the two river valleys The Nile River Valley and The Tigris Euphrates river valley.
In three of the world's oldest civilizations, the development of Agriculture proved surprisingly similar. Despite long distances between each culture, especially in the case of Mesoamerica, all three developed “staple” crops that proved very important for their food sources (BBC, FAO, Nair, National Geographic). While China and the Indus River Valley domesticated various animals for food, Mesoamerica did not rely on domesticated animals nearly as much (BBC, Nair), not even for labor (FAO). Although the types of crops they grew resulted in different diets for all three civilizations, the Neolithic Revolution remained the fundamental basis for all their nutritional development (BBC, FAO, Nair). Even with various different features in climate,
According to Document B, "Waters receded but Nile high enough to fill irrigation canals: crops planted and tended. " With the predictable flooding patterns they were able to make a farming schedule. So they could make the most crops. The river influenced their seasons
Ancient India’s geography greatly impacted their civilization and way of life. It is one of the best-known subcontinents, and believe it or not, India used to be a small island floating around the world. India later collided with Asia, forming the Himalayan Mountains. India has plenty more interesting history, climate, and physical features.
In the Ancient world, Life began around rivers. Throughout this essay I will be comparing and contrasting two of the prominent ancient civilizations, the Egyptians and the Sumerians. They had many cultural and governmental differences between them. Below are some examples. To start, each civilization began next to a river(s).
For instance, the Nile River had an impact on Egypt, the Indus River had an impact on Southern Asia, and the Euphrates and Tigris rivers influenced Mesopotamia. Its business and culture were significantly impacted by the country's geographic location. The development of the enormous towns of Mohenjo-Daro and Harappa was fostered by the Indus River. The culture and economy of the area around the Indus River were influenced by its geographical location. Geography has an impact on the economy and cultures of many nations.
The essay will discuss a paper written by anthropologist Gregory Possehl – Sociocultural complexity without the state: the Indus Civilization. It will first present the usual classification when approaching ancient civilisations and briefly summarise Possehl’s main argument. The essay will then dig more deeply into the Indus case, relying on archaeological findings, to see how far Possehl’s position can be supported. Archaeologists and anthropologists are usually classifying social groups considering their social organisation and material culture – one widely accepted classification recognizes four levels of development: (1) the band, a hunter-gather, kinship-based group, (2) the tribe, an organised collection of bands, (3) the chiefdom, a centrally organised kinship-based group with hierarchy and single leader, and (4) the state, a complex, hierarchical, centrally organised, non-kinship-based social organisation (Young 2014:19). Such a classification has stirred debates among scholars, as it conveys the preconceived idea that social groups ‘progress’ following this linear trajectory – furthermore, it is difficult to define the moment and the circumstances associated to a change of status (when does a band become a tribe?)
Every civilization throughout history has their ups and downs. What if these ups and downs could all be connected back to one main factor, to one influence? Throughout history, it can be noticed that the location of a civilization affects the shape of its culture, economy, trade, and security of its borders. It defines which societies rise to power and which lose power. Geography influences history in many ways, as can be seen in the Indus Valley, Greece, and Aksum civilizations.
Throughout time civilizations have risen and collapsed. Some were conquered while others simply disappeared. The Egyptian civilization thrived near the Nile River from 3000 B.C. and was later conquered by the Persian Empire around 525 B.C. In the other hand, the Mayan civilization developed in Yucatan Peninsula around 200 B.C., and mysterious disappeared around 900 A.D. However, these two cultures share many factors in common such as developing calendars and building pyramids. Even though civilizations developed in different time periods, they can still have many factors in common such as environment, language, and architecture.
1. According to the section of the textbook titled "The Emergence of Civilization" there are a number of proposed causes to why civilizations developed. One theory, for instance, suggests that material forces such as agriculture allowed for a unified community that demanded a specialization of labor. A second argument contradicts the former, claiming that nonmaterial forces (particularly, religion) influenced the establishment of these complex cultures.