Throughout both sources they go through inside their own opinions on Industrial labor during the 1830s. the primary source states to three testimonials of three different piers and their field they have mixed opinions on the situation staying their own alternatives towards child labor and the factory Act. While the secondary source stated if the early industrial society during the thirties was in a progress or in the decline. One could compare in contrast these two writings about Poor conditions and the industrial society.
My perspective on both writings are that I agree with what they are saying and both terms. The primary source States testimonials have three different areas. The first one explains how labor for children starts at a young age and it is poor conditions
…show more content…
His argument also States how they should limit the ages and the hours to prevent injuries. I agree with this testimonial because the commissioner does see the pain and injury is coming from Labour but he want to stop child labor but he wants the Limited in certain areas. Some children and families cannot afford to let their children stop working at a young age and long hours just based on their financial problems but also to the uneducated untrained child of a young age this labor may be too hard for them. By cutting the age families are safer but also overtime will have their children working. At this time in history that sounds reasonable. The second testimonial explains the poorest conditions Through The Eyes of a labor workers during that time. My opinion on this matter is that it hurts to hear these conditions before they were limited or changed. In the testimonial it states opinions from the writer saying how bad conditions