More handpicked essays just for you.
Summary of the necklace by guy de maupassant
Summary of the necklace by guy de maupassant
Essay analysis the necklace
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Summary of the necklace by guy de maupassant
At the end of the story, irony makes its appearance. Mathilde borrowed and lost a necklace from a friend. Her and her husband bought a new one as a replacement, furthermore, dedicated the next ten years to pay for
We are greedy. We as humans cling to the materialistic things in our lives. Some of us have everything we need to live a perfectly comfortable life, but keep wanting. Greed controls almost everyone, no matter how many possessions we have in our name. In this, when our greed exceed our needs, we lose sight of what is important, leading to our detriment.
In the short story “The Necklace” Madame Loisel was a rich women who thought she was poor. She valued having a nice appearance and looking elegant. Madame Loisel borrowed a necklace that she thought was gorgeous, she then lost the necklace but didn’t want to tell the lady she lost it so she went to look for
In “The Necklace”s the text states,“She had no clothes,no jewels,nothing. And these were the only things she loved;she felt that she was made for them. She had longed so eagerly to charm,to be desired,to be wildly attractive and sought after”( de Maupassant 4).This demonstrates, that she craves what other people have not just wants it. The only things she valued were things she couldn't afford but others could. Madame Mathilde Loisel believed she was made for things that other people had but she could never get.
The short story “The Necklace,” by Guy de Maupassant emphasizes the message that materialism will not bring happiness, and the way to happiness is by accepting what one has. Near the beginning of the story, de Maupassant describes how Madame Loisel spends her time: “She grieved incessantly, feeling that she had been born for all the little niceties and luxuries of living” (221). This description shows how Madame Loisel is very depressed, due to the fact that she is not happy with what she has. When de Maupassant wrote, “She grieved incessantly…” he explains how Loisel was dissatisfied, and showed what materialism can do to one’s feelings. When Monsieur Loisel asks Madame Loisel to wear flowers to the party, she replies, “‘No….
According to “The Necklace” it discusses how appearance can be deceiving due to the reality of what the necklace cost even if it looked extravagant by its expensive jewels (SparkNotes). After having a remarkable night it soon took a toll on her life without her knowing by losing the jeweled necklace. Not only does it ruin her but Maupassant proves to the reader “How little a thing it takes to destroy you or to save you” (Maupassant 12). Mrs. Loisel focused so much on what she couldn’t have that when she had lost the necklace she asked herself what would life be like before she lost it. Therefore, she realized how much she had it made and because of this what others considered to be wealth is not always the same definition of what it meant to
Human nature causes people to desire more than what one already has. However, after desiring material items, people realize the foolishness in their greed. In “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant, Mathilde Loisel, who lives in France during the 1880s, attempts to transform her ordinary life into one of luxury. She attends a reception with her friend Madame Forestier's diamond necklace, but after losing it, she works to buy a new necklace, only to later discover the necklace she lost is fake. Through this experience, Mathilde learns to be content with what she has, and as a result, she realizes the flaws in her character.
She was always so rude to him when he tries to help. Shot down all of his suggestions when he tried to help her look nice for the party. Also she made him do most of the work. The ending is pretty ironic because the whole time they thought it was a real diamond necklace, but it was fake and they bought a real diamond necklace to replace it and were in crippling dept. The story King Midas shares some of these topics as well.
The theme of “The Necklace” is to be happy with what you have, because in pursuing frivolous, unneeded items, one can lose sight of all that they do have. Mathilde deeply cares about how she portrays herself to the public, she may not be wealthy, but she wants to look wealthy. When Mathilde states, “Nothing. Only I have no dress, and therefore I can’t go to this ball…” (239).
In the story appearances matter most, the story shows us how Mathilde tried her best to appear and fit in the high class society. When in reality when she borrowed the diamond necklace just for one night to impress people she barely knows it was never going to be enough. Society always has a way of bringing people down at their lowest point Mathilde went through years of hard labor paying for the necklace she borrowed to look wealthy in a society she did not belong to, in a high social class where appearances makes an induvial significant .Mathilde claims she lives a life in poverty, poverty to one’s understanding is where an induvial has no place to sleep or eat but, Madame Mathilde has a little house and does not go to sleep on an empty stomach. She lives the life an average person would want to
The story illustrates economic and social inequality in a proletariat woman’s life, Mathilde and how much it costs in her living when she wishes to be perfect on bourgeoisies’ eyes. The Necklace also supports the Marxist idea that people are mere creation of the economic and social circumstances. In the very beginning of the story, Mathilde is already described as a lower class woman to be born “into a family of artisan.” By marrying off to a little clerk, who belongs to a middle class people, makes Mathilde’s life even worse. She seems cannot easily accept her life condition, she always daydreams of becoming a part of the bourgeoisie society.
A Change in Mathilde Loisel “The Necklace” “If there is no struggle, there is no progress” - Frederick Douglass. This quote is explored in the short story, “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant, as he introduces a low-middle-class, materialistic women named Mathilde Loisel who is unhappy at the level of her life and one who goes through complicated struggles. Mathilde Loisel changes throughout the story because over a ten year span, she realizes what it means to live a life in impoverishment. Towards the end, she changed from the demanding work she had to do. Another change in her personality is when she is described as a peasant woman guarding every coin of her allowance.
She was never happy and satisfied with what she had and always daydreamed of large ballrooms… decorated with oriental tapestries and lighted by high bronze floor lamps. She wanted to be the envy of all other women. When her husband gets an invite to the ball she wishes to appear wealthy to the other women at the ball. She borrows a diamond necklace from a wealthy friend, Mme Forestier. At the ball, she becomes pretty, elegant, gracious and smiling than all the other ladies, and she finds herself enjoying the party.
The protagonist of ‘The Necklace’, Madame Loisel, live a rather steady, ordinary middle-class life in the beginning of the story. However, she views that she is intended for a luxurious life, and, therefore, does not cherish what she has. She takes a step forward to her desires, as she was invited to a ball where all the upper-class woman would be, yet she was unhappy with the fact that she does not even have a stone to put on.
Good authors create interesting characters that evokes some emotion from the readers. That is the case of the protagonist Mathilde Loisel, in Guy de Maupassant’s story “The Necklace.” Mathilde comes across as unsatisfied with her life and selfish which makes her easy to dislike. She first show how much she dislikes her life “She grieved incessantly, feeling that she had been born for all the little niceties and luxuries of living. ”(Maupassant 221).
