ipl-logo

Essay On Substance Dualism

833 Words4 Pages

1.0 Introduction
Basically, Philosophy of Mind is the branch of philosophy that studies the nature of the mind in sense of the consciousness, mental events, mental properties, and mental function with their relationship with the physical body. Field of computer science, neurobiology as well as psychology are some extent to which philosophy of mind intersect with.
As Philosophy of mind is considered as a part of metaphysics, it also has been particularly studied by school of thought like Existentialism, Analytic Philosophy as well as Phenomenology. It has been studied by this kind school of thought until now and even it has been discussed by philosophers from the earliest times. The nature of death, the nature of what a person is, which regarding …show more content…

It argues that the mind is a substance that is independently exists, so that the mental does not have extension in space, and the material cannot think. Descartes is famously defended this type of Dualism and most theologies is compatible with this kind of dualism. This is because it claims that immortal souls occupy an independent "realm" of existence distinct from that of the physical world.
Then, there is Property Dualism which claims that mind is a group of independent properties that emerge from the brain; however that it is not a distinct substance. So, when for an example, a matter is organized in the appropriate way like the way that living human bodies organized, the mental properties is emerge there are three main types of this kind of Dualism.
The first one is well known as Interactionism. It allows that mental causes like belief and desires to produce material effect and vice versa. Descartes believed that this interaction physically occurred in the pineal gland.
A material basis of interaction between immaterial and material is impossible and that the interactions were really caused by the intervention of God on each individual occasion is known as Occasionalism. One of the rationalist who is well known as Nicholas Malebranche was the major proponent of this

Show More
Related
308 Words | 2 Pages

In Lonely Souls: Causality and Substance Dualism, Jaegwon Kim argues againist Cartesian dualism which are the main argument points that Cartesian dualism cannot reasonably explain just how two things so all in all different as unextended souls and extended bodies can casually interact. Cartesian dualism is developt on properties can be divided into two which they are mental, such as wishing anything or being in pain while physical properties are being in certain weight, shape or mass. No intimate association between physical and mental properties condensed of identity; therefore, Jaegwon supports that whereever we find a mental property that is logically sufficient for a physical effect. Related to his argument topics Jaegwon reassess the

Read More
768 Words | 4 Pages

1.) What does it mean to say that Descartes was a dualist and an interactionist? According to Descartes, How did humans differ from animals? To say that Descartes was a dualist is to say that he believed the mind and body are two separate and distinguishable essences. The immaterial mind and the material body although separate, causally interact.

Read More
690 Words | 3 Pages

I think the author was a dualist, because of the characters he created. If he was a monist he would have gone against his own beliefs of the mind body problem. Gestalt and Myfanwy both show how the mind is separate from the body. Gestalt is able to control five bodies with one mind and the conscious can jump from one body to the next. Gestalt’s mind is not a part of the body but connected to it in another way.

Read More
607 Words | 3 Pages

In this paper I will explain Elizabeth of Bohemia’s main argument against Cartesian dualism. I will also explain why Churchland rejects Cartesian dualism and her arguments against it and what alternatives she has in mind. At the end I will explain why I think a Cartesian mind is not plausible. Descartes believed in Cartesian Dualism, which is saying that the mind and body are two different things. He says that the body can be divided into pieces but the mind/soul are indivisible.

Read More
1005 Words | 5 Pages

For example, if the brain stops working it doesn’t affect the mind because the mind continues to exist. The Body-Mind Problem is the philosophical question of how the mind and body are related and if the mind is a non-physical substance. We

Read More
1919 Words | 8 Pages

Conclusion: The mind is substantively different from the body and indeed matter in general. Because in this conception the mind is substantively distinct from the body it becomes plausible for us to doubt the intuitive connection between mind and body. Indeed there are many aspects of the external world that do not appear to have minds and yet appear none the less real in spite of this for example mountains, sticks or lamps, given this we can begin to rationalize that perhaps minds can exist without bodies, and we only lack the capacity to perceive them.

Read More
785 Words | 4 Pages

In the realm of Philosophy, different views about the definition of the mind and its interactions exist. Among the many, Dualism stands as one of the most debatable, thanks to its position about the relationship of the mind and body, and its repercussions. This assignment discusses the dualist relationship between the mind and the body, as well as its impact on the individual free will. It asserts Interventionism as an extension of Dualism, as well as an alternative to Determinism. The objective of this endeavor is to present the Dualist approach to Mind and Body as an alternative or possible solution to the dilemma of Determinism.

Read More
164 Words | 1 Pages

not be human but he does consider him to have feelings and inner soul. That Data does have the choice of free will, to make the decision not to be disassembled. Upon the reading in chapter 3, Picard sides more with a dualist. Dualism is the theory that the mind and body in some sense, are two different things. However, humans may have both physical and mental attributes.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

In his philosophical thesis, of the ‘Mind-Body dualism’ Rene Descartes argues that the mind and the body are really distinct, one of the most deepest and long lasting legacies. Perhaps the strongest argument that Descartes gives for his claim is that the non extended thinking thing like the Mind cannot exist without the extended non thinking thing like the Body. Since they both are substances, and are completely different from each other. This paper will present his thesis in detail and also how his claim is critiqued by two of his successors concluding with a personal stand.

Read More
1536 Words | 7 Pages

It roots to our idea of the philosophy of life, in terms of reflection on our existence as humans and not only the contingence but the limitations thereof. Death encompasses the individual’s fundamental existence on the one hand and reshapes our concepts of its nature complementing one another in order to enlighten the idea of it. The manifestation of an individual to herself/himself is made probable by nothingness. The notion of spirituality and death in existentialism.

Read More
526 Words | 3 Pages

He argues that the body and soul are two elements that have the same underlying substance. He maintains that a person’s soul is the same as his nature of body; however, he argues that the mind differed from other parts of the body as it lacked a physical feature. In this case, he maintains that the intellect lacks a physical form, and this allows it to receive every form. It allows a person to think about anything, including the material object. In this case, he argues that if the intellect were in a material form, it could be sensitive to only some physical objects.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

They say that mental processes are the same thing as brain processes. This gives us a better explanatory role with causation regarding mental states. According to the identity theory, the “Mind” and the “Brain” refer to one object (the physical brain). (Anthony Oyowe, personal

Read More
703 Words | 3 Pages

This paper will critically examine the Cartesian dualist position and the notion that it can offer a plausible account of the mind and body. Proposed criticisms deal with both the logical and empirical conceivability of dualist assertions, their incompatibility with physical truths, and the reducibility of the position to absurdity. Cartesian Dualism, or substance dualism, is a metaphysical position which maintains that the mind and body consist in two separate and ontologically distinct substances. On this view, the mind is understood to be an essentially thinking substance with no spatial extension; whereas the body is a physical, non-thinking substance extended in space. Though they share no common properties, substance dualists maintain

Read More
1783 Words | 8 Pages

We often regard death as something negative and because of this; death always connotes a bad meaning for individuals. However they do not see the both side of the coin, they failed to notice and recognize that “having to die” do not just affect us in a negative way because it also somehow affects us positively. In a different angle and perspective, we can view death’s implication on human life in a

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

Biologically the core of human mind, brain is composed of one hundred billions of neurons interacting with each other through electrical activity. Efficiently linked neurons pass each other information and if those linkage happens in synchrony, and it is called consciousness. In simple words human consciousness can be understood as being aware of the informations the neurons pass on or as the feeling the soul inside us. In Psychology, theory of dual process explains how human consciousness work. Initiated by William James, who first founded the two types of thinking including the true reasoning and associative, dual process theory was concluded by Daniel Kahneman, who analyzed thoughts into System a and System 2 with his best selling book called “Thinking fast and slow” (2011,Farrar, Straus and Giroux).

Read More

More about Essay On Substance Dualism

Related Topics

Open Document