ipl-logo

Is Capitalism Inherently Informative?

773 Words4 Pages

Many people today believe that the current capitalist system we live in is purely exploitative. Yet is this truly the case? Capitalism is an economic system in which all natural resources and the means of production are privately owned (Merriam-webster.com, 2017). Exploitation is the act of treating someone unfairly in order to profit from their work. It can also be defined as the act of using and benefiting from resources, for example environmental resources. (Oxford Dictionaries | English, 2017). The fundamental principles of capitalism will be focused on in this essay. They will be used to determine whether or not capitalism is inherently exploitative. Exploitation will also be looked at, not just in terms of the worker, but also natural …show more content…

Marx illustrates (1867 pp. 27-30) that commodities are the basic units of capitalism. Commodities are goods or services that are produced by human labour and put up for general sale in the market as a product (Marx, 1867 p. 38). Their prices are determined by supply and demand (Merriam-webster.com, 2017). Weeks argues, in ‘Capital and Exploitation’, (1981 p.40) that when labour is monetized, as it is under the capitalist system, labour power itself becomes a commodity. Labour power also adds value to a commodity (Marx, 1867 pp. 35-37). In capitalism, labour power is the only means of production owned by the working class. Capitalists own all other means of production. Capitalists need labour power to produce other commodities. Labour can therefore be exchanged for money at a certain ratio. This, argues Marx and Engels (1992), forms the foundation of the relationship between the capitalists and the working class. Marx believes that the value of any commodity directly correlates to the amount of labour time that goes into it. This is Marx’s Law of Value (Marx as cited by Weeks, 1981 p. …show more content…

30). Wage labour is employment for a designated weekly or monthly wage, normally under stipulations decided by the employer (A Dictionary of Sociology, 2016). Weeks argues (1981 p.40) that the labour power of wage labourers is exploited by capitalists under Marx’s Law of Value, or as he calls it, the Law of Surplus Value. Exploitation occurs when wage workers work for longer than it takes to make commodities (Marx 1867 pp. 132-138). Surplus value is the difference between the value added by the wage labourer to a commodity and the value of their labour power (Saad-Filho and Morais, 2012 p.35). It creates profit. The capitalist, to make profits, sets the working day at a certain length. Some of the day is consumed by producing value that sustains the workers basic needs. The remainder generates surplus value, taken by the capitalist (Marx, 1867 pp.132-138). Marx (1867 pp. 132-138) argues that this is inevitable exploitation in

Show More
Related
950 Words | 4 Pages

Its functional interdependencies are also discounted in the economic calculus. 2. Man has a right, even an obligation, to use this capital for constant self-advancement. Capitalism is an intensely maximizing culture, always seeking to get more out of the natural resources of the world than it did yesterday. The highest economic rewards go to those who have done the most to extract from nature all it can yield.

Read More
580 Words | 3 Pages

This essay will attempt to analyze and discuss the ways tycoons and corporations could be exploitative without government intervention. One of the main ways capitalism could be seen as exploitative

Read More
1024 Words | 5 Pages

Overall, capitalism put every opportunity into the hands of “exploiters of the labor force” who had distinctly different beliefs than these farmers and wage workers, which is why they demanded more from the

Read More
552 Words | 3 Pages

Looking at Karl Marx, his contributions attempting to explain social changes arising from the industrial revolution linger in current developments and the working class are still very prevalent today. The conflict within the economy, or capitalism, was Marx’s main focus in his theories as he described the two main groups in our economy, the working class and the ruling class. The working class were simply proletariats under the power of the ruling class. These citizens would sell their labor power in exchange for money as they simply operated production equipment, they did not own it. The ruling, or capitalist, class were the more powerful people in the economy that owned these means of production.

Read More
325 Words | 2 Pages

Marx believed that the Bourgeoisie class exploited the Proletariats and used their labor for capital gain. In fact, at one point, the goods and services

Read More
1097 Words | 5 Pages

Marx states that labor “not only produces commodities. It also produces itself and the worker as a commodity, and indeed in the same proportion as it produces

Read More
390 Words | 2 Pages

In the beginning of the 19th century, the Industrial Revolution caused a massive economic spike from small-scale production to large factories and mass production. Capitalism became the prevalent mode of the economy, which put all means of production in the hands of the bourgeoisie, or the upper class. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels argue that capitalism centralizes all the wealth and power in the bourgeoisie, despite the proletariat, or the working class, being the overwhelming majority of the population. The manufacturers would exploit the common proletariat and force them to would work in abysmal conditions and receive low wages, furthering the working class poverty. “The Communist Manifesto” predicts that as a result of the mistreatment

Read More
1199 Words | 5 Pages

Adam Smith, an advocate of capitalism, in his book, The Wealth of Nations wrote that all individuals are selfish and by performing to the best of their capabilities towards their own selfish interests they contribute towards the nation’s collective growth. Karl Marx, on the other hand criticized capitalism and believed that socialism and communism are society’s best chance of maximizing individual happiness, about which he wrote in his book Das Kapital. In this paper, we will compare and contrast the economics theories of Adam Smith and Karl Marx on the lines of labor theory of value, division of labor, alienation of workers from labor and human happiness and surplus profit and its social implications. This paper will also discuss how… Adam Smith believes that there are two types of ‘values’ of a commodity – ‘utility value’ and ‘exchange value’. The utility value of a commodity is based on how useful a commodity is and the exchange value of a commodity refers to how much we can get in exchange for a commodity if we were to sell it.

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

The bourgeoisie class or capitalists are the owners of capital. They purchase and abuse labour resources using their high position and power to their advantage and to the disadvantage of the poor labored class and hence are able to increase their wealth and power. Being wealthy is, in itself, not sufficient to make one a capitalist (e.g. managers in the state sector or landlords). What is necessary is the active role of using this wealth to make it self-expansive through employment and exploitation of labour. 2.

Read More
452 Words | 2 Pages

The main point Marx’s text dealt with was that in the current world order, things (commodities) seem to have intrinsic values. He points out that things attain these values regardless of how and with what process of labour they were produced. This intrinsic value characteristic has no physical basis and appears as magical. Therefore the ‘fetishism’ allegory that Marx adopts I think fits well into the situation, used in order to describe the mystical properties of commodities. Nothing that is worth money, or money (gold) itself, has an exchange-value stemming from their inherent characteristics, so he puts forward that this value seems to be generated by the social relations of people and calls the notion the fetishism of commodities.

Read More
1539 Words | 7 Pages

In his work, he focusses on commodities and how they are affected in capitalism. On one hand, consumers use commodities, or any good or service produced by human service, without thinking about all parts of production that led to the product being in their hands. This phenomenon is what Marx calls commodity fetishism. In Capital, he discusses how a commodity has both a use and exchange value. A use value refers how a commodity can be used to satisfy a human want or need and how it is used in society, where as the exchange value is is how it can exchanged for other commodity.

Read More
1000 Words | 4 Pages

“Capitalist production, therefore,develops technology, and combining together of various processes into a social whole, only by sapping the original source of all wealth--the soil and the labourer. In proportion as the exploitation

Read More
847 Words | 4 Pages

Marx and Engels look at capitalism with seriously negative opinions. They regard the system as extremely unsuitable, and are deeply concerned with getting rid of it. In a capitalist society, capitalists own and control the main resources of production - machinery, factories, mines, capital, etc. The modern working classes, or proletariats, own only their labor. Proletariats work for the capitalists, who own the product that was produced and then sell it for a profit.

Read More
846 Words | 4 Pages

Capitalism is understood to be the “economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state.” In modern society, capitalism has become the dominant economic system and has become so integrated that it has resulted in a change in the relationships individuals have with other members of society and the materials within society. As a society, we have become alienated from other members of society and the materials that have become necessary to regulate ourselves within it, often materials that we ourselves, play a role in producing. Capitalism has resulted in a re-organization of societies, a more specialized and highly segmented division of labour one which maintains the status quo in society by alienating the individual. Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim theorize on how power is embodied within society and how it affects the individuals of society.

Read More
1074 Words | 5 Pages

Marx’s theory on exploitation is related to his earlier writings on the theory of alienation. They are both similar in that they are both highly critical of the capitalist system. Grint,(2005) emphasises that before Karl Marx nobody had ever confronted the idea of exploitive wage labour, many great thinkers of Marx’s time like Locke and Ricardo thought that the value of the wage labour was exactly equivalent to the labour expended while producing a product. Watson,T.J (2008) states that “ capitalist employment is exploitive in attempting to take from working people the value which they create through their labour and which is properly their own. ”P.62.

Read More

More about Is Capitalism Inherently Informative?

Related Topics

Open Document