Good writing is clear, structured, and resourceful. Regardless of the genre of writing, or the audience receiving the message, It’s important that the message can be conveyed to them accurately, this is hard to do when we can’t agree on a way of determining this, or when we disregard the necessity to have acceptable or unacceptable view of writing, within reason of course. Writing should also be structured, without structure there’s nothing that says a writer can’t abruptly alter the format they’re writing in and describe unrelated, and unimportant information. Also, writing should be resourceful. Resourceful text is kind of inherent, and goes hand-in-hand with clearly written text as well. The idea that any piece of text could be considered “good …show more content…
Considering the topic of clear writing, I define this as any writing that is followable by its readers. Any text that cannot be understood, analyzed, answered, or otherwise provide to its audience is likely not going to be considered “good”. A writer/author who stays on point, speaks with intelligence, can entice thought in their audience, or tell a compelling or otherwise enjoyable story is likely to be utilized or favored over one who appears to show no regard for these traits. Writing conveys speech, and speech is language; just as a person's language can influence our opinions of them, so can their written words. For example, I could argue that the belligerent, uneducated person in society is likely to never be considered as anymore than such. They might have everything in the world to offer people, but they lack in their ability to convey their message in a way that society would consider worthy to