In “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicholas Carr writes about how he has a challenging time reading books that after a few pages he loses concentration and that his mind wanders to other things. The reading that use to come natural to him no longer does and he believes the internet is to blame, what once took a few hours searching through multiple books in the library for information now can be found in a few minutes searched on the internet. He also mentions other bloggers that confess how they either no longer read books or do not read articles that are longer than a few paragraphs or that they just skim articles on the internet. Carr lists many posts from other people also from different years some going back to the 1980s.
In Is Google Making Us Stupid, Nicholas Carr argues that Internet changes how we think and act. First, he provides a personal example on how he cannot focus on reading for more than a few pages because Google has made him more efficient in doing research by going online rather than grinding through long readings. Then, Carr presents another example on a blogger, Brue Friedman, who also admits that he lost his ability to read long text after search engine became popular. Furthermore, Carr expresses his idea by using an historical example. Friedrich Nietzsche, who bought a typewriter in the late 1800s, changed his style of writing once he got familiar with the typewriter.
Nicholas Carr claims his opinion on how computer and internet changed people’s way of thinking and going to turn people into machines in the essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid”. He states current situation that we are in a Internet era and his mind is not going like before when we focused on deep reading. First of all, the new universal medium Net reshape our process of thought, from concentrating on one reading to skimming readings. Although we read more, we did not completely understand it and made a rich mental connection with it. He talks about how Google’s value contradict people’s healthy growth.
In Nicholas Carr’s article called “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, Carr talks about the many issues he believes are stemming from using online search engines and Google in general. This article was written back in 2016 and published into The Norton Field Guide to Writing with Readings. Carr discusses his view on the whole idea of online readings and most of the information available to the world being viewed online through a search engine like Google. He also goes into thorough detail explaining how he believes that technology is becoming more advanced and smarter than its creators. In Carr’s article, he will explain all that he believes is wrong with technology in today’s society and how dumbed down it has made us.
Carr says “…I can feel it, too” (57). Then, he mentioned the research from different credited writers who feel the same he does about the impact of the web to appeal the audience in and persuade them that the internet is causing mainly problems by saying “I am not the only one” (Carr 58). He also clearly states the idea that users are
Meredith Weese D. Ballenger ENGL – 112 10 March 2023 Evaluation Essay Nicholas Carr’s article in The Atlantic magazine July/August 2008 issue titled “Is Google Making Us Stupid” purpose is to inform the readers. With the way the internet and its vast amount of information at the tip of our fingers has altered our ability to dive deep into readings. Whether it is for educational purposes or pleasure our ability to spend hours in a book have changed. Nicholas Carr’s article “Is Google Making Us Stupid” achieved its purpose because the examples he used from himself and others, the writing is clear easy to follow as he makes relevant references to the way other technologies have changed our way of thinking, his writing is objective.
“Is Google Making Us Stupid” written by Nicholas Carr is a great article. He attempts to help us understand that as a society the more that the World Wide Web turns into our essential source of data, it starts to lower our ability to read books. Despite the fact that reading offers information that the internet may already have, it makes the learning process slower. One of the first things that Carr makes clear in this writing piece is that he loses focus very quickly when reading. Carr felt that the web should make searching things quick and easy.
He believes the internet is causing our brains to become reorganized and nt store as much as it use to because we rely on the internet
In the article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, Nicholas Carr asserts that increased Internet usage is negatively impacting people’s capacity for concentration and contemplation. Because people are spending more time on the Internet where texts are framed by numerous advertisements, they are no longer able to fully immerse themselves in reading material. He uses Friedrich Nietzsche as a prime example of how regular media usage can have detrimental effects on an individual’s reading and writing skills. Relying on observations made by German scholar Friedrich A. Kittler, Carr explains how Nietzsche’s writing, which had been eloquent when Nietzsche had handwritten all of his work, became telegraphic and prosaic after he started to use a typewriter.
In the article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicholas Carr describes the type of reading that we used to do. Lengthy, all-day, immerse yourself into a whole other world, has gone away, according to Nicholas Carr. Instead, we skim
In a world that remains largely consumed in technology, we have to wonder if the Internet, that is simply a touch away, is making us stupid. In his article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” author Nicholas Carr talks about his struggle to stay engaged for more than about three pages while reading a book (The Atlantic). We have become consumed in the idea of convince, so we have learned to skim news articles, web articles, and social media.
Some people may believe that the internet is changing the world in a bad way. In the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” the author, Nicholas Carr, talks about how he believes that the internet could be taking over the world. Carr believes that the world relies on the internet entirely too much. To some people, his argument could seem valid because almost everyone in today’s technological driven world look towards the internet and search engines like Google to answer their questions rather than trying to figure it out themselves and learning from their journey to find the answer.
I wonder what Mahatma Gandhi did to transform himself from a poor farmer to the leader of nonviolence resistance in the world. I wonder why billions of birds and animals migrate miles away in response to climate to survive. I wonder what Isaac Newton would have done if he had not taken his uncle’s advice of leaving agriculture and attending the University of Cambridge. I wonder about those who clicked on the buttons “like” and “share” and made a huge vibration in the world and changed the face of the history. In the world that we live in today, social media is a wonderful invention that changes everything around us.
When European settlers first broke land in American, several differences divided them from natives previously inhabiting this "new" land. Back home the Europeans were accustomed to large masses of people inhabiting small areas with well defined borders under a single government. The native Americans however were the exact opposite; they were accustomed to smaller groups of people in large vast areas with socially defined borders. The native Americans were also, for the most part, self governed within their respective tribes. With these stark differences, coupled with the ethnocentric perspective of the Europeans, it is easy to see how conflict quickly exploded into violent incidents.
Instead the readers are receiving information all about cons of using internet. Also, for instances, Carr failed to provide the reality of today’s internet
