This article is about President Trump’s pervasive threat of conformity regarding the Iran nuclear deal. He persistently pressures Iran to be decertified of the quarterly nonproliferation deal. Trump’s criticism of this case would question the credibility of the U.S. in terms of its worldwide political leadership and as an economic partner. In this article, the individual level of analysis was used to target Mr. Trump’s impulsive notion regarding the Iran deal. In Mr. Trump’s agenda of sabotaging the compliance certification, this “reckless choice on the Iran deal would also free Iran to resume unfettered nuclear activities and constitute a slap in the face to major powers- Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China” (page 2). The writer implies that Trump’s decision to …show more content…
What happens on the deal revolves around Trump’s decision and his decision affects the image of the U.S. The author has also added that Trump uses “sovereignty as his guiding principle for international relations” (page 3). Meaning, Trump’s use of sovereign power would result in the unraveling of the limitations about nuclear arms in the realm of nuclear-armed countries. His political behaviour would cost the U.S.’s credibility and this will weaken the global political standing of the nation. His self-principle of how to wield his sovereign power would indicate that his addresses about foreign policies will be based on what he thinks is the right thing to do. An alternative level of analysis is the international system analysis. The author would have included the major powers’ uneasiness about the unrevealed decision of Trump because they are not sure if they would host nuclear weapons or build their own weaponry. This anxiety feeling indicates that the Trump administration has an alpha dog appeal amongst the members of the