ipl-logo

Is Richard III Innocent Or Guilty

1024 Words5 Pages

Richard the III’s name carries the weight of historic controversy. He is either the rightful heir to the English monarchy or he is guilty of the murder of his two nephews: young Edward and the young Prince of York. The claims of his innocence and guilt have been debated over centuries. It is wise to consider both viewpoints, especially as there is now more evidence to support Richard III’s innocence. After analysis of all the evidence, it is clear that Richard III is an innocent man, and rightful King of England. The journey to proving his innocence begins on October 2, 1452 when Richard III was born at Fotheringhay Castle, in Northamptonshire, England. He is the son of Richard, the third Duke of York and Cecily Neville, Duchess of York. The …show more content…

Historically, it is claimed that Richard III killed the two princes and held them hostage in the Tower of London to guarantee his succession to the throne. Richard III is painted as being greedy and ambitious, willing to do anything - including murder his two nephews - in the pursuit of power. Richard III’s image is synonymous with evil and ill will due to Shakepeare’s portrayal of the king in his famous play titled “Richard the III''. The dramatized acting in the play led the public to believe that the story was true - Richard was a murderous …show more content…

His innocence is found within his character. His character, being loyal, dutiful, and a respected man. There is a quote by a man who goes by the name of Sir George Buck who wrote in 1643 “All accusations of him are not proved, And he built churches, and made good law’s, And all men held him wise, and valiant” This was a man who fought by his very side and is a witness to Richards valor. However, if his character is not satisfactory to those who are more skeptical, then look at his actions. It’s the age old saying “actions speak louder than words” Richard was consistent with his actions and his loyalty towards Edward, and he loved his nephews as if they were his own. Edward trusted Richard with such a gravity that he left Richard as protector of the young princess and keeper of his family. His innocence is also claimed through Edward IV's unexpected death. He had no motive or ambition to become king before that time. Furthermore he agreed with his brother's positions on political matters, and supported him in every aspect. Hence, when Edward the IV died he felt it his dutiful and moral obligation to ensure the crown was passed onto a legitimate

Show More
Related
1360 Words | 6 Pages

As a future king, Edward V did not have much time to play. He had to prepare for his coronation and learn how to rule the country. Edward’s tutors knew that they had much to teach him and so they prepared him as much as possible. These preparations took up most of Edward’s day leaving him no time to play. While Prince Richard is in sanctuary, Richard III argues that he does not need to be there because the council can protect Prince Richard.

Read More
1414 Words | 6 Pages

Of course, it is possible that the writer, Thomas More, had little to no recollection of the events of King Richard’s ruling and murders, and that he had a bit of a bias, but Grant has no evidence to justify completely throw out all of his claims. Young when Richard was in power, More also worked for the family that defeated Richard, the Tudors. However, More’s book, The History of King Richard III, should not have been completely thrown out as false by Grant. Although the information in More’s account could be fabricated in order to give Richard a bad name, Grant cannot know that for sure. Unable to go and interview the men himself, he decides to take it upon himself to decide the

Read More
1370 Words | 6 Pages

The Witan Gemot did not support his ascension to the throne, and he was hurriedly crowned by the archbishop without the nobles’ consent on the day of Edward’s burial. As a Norman monk wrote in 1120, “Harold had himself crowned King alone by Archbishop Stigund, without the common consent of the other bishops and nobles” (Source 2). Without the support of the nobles and the Witan Gemot, Harold’s claim to the throne had no value and was therefore illegitimate. In fact, as the Norman monk goes on to write, “When the English learned that Harold taken the throne they were moved to anger; some of the most powerful were ready to resist him by force” (Source 2).

Read More
1218 Words | 5 Pages

Richard III was the final installation of Shakespeare’s history plays. During this time Shakespeare found success and was highly popular. As such, the values that are affirmed by the play’s ending align with the ruling of the Tudors at the time. Shakespeare was creating characters who were not only more psychologically complex but with greater dimensions, even though during this time in Elizabethan England had very little understanding of human psychology. War of the Roses

Read More
325 Words | 2 Pages

William is a distant cousin to Edwards, so he confirms his title because he has blood association. William states that a few years ago, Edward choose Williams to be his heir. In 1051 Edward the confessor promised to make Edward the air of England which promised him a large leap of power. In 1066 Edward changed his mind and gave crown to Harold who had no tie to the throne.

Read More
100 Words | 1 Pages

Richard the Lionheart is one of the most famous of kings, if not the most, in England and France. He was born on September 8, 1157 and died on April 6, 1199. He is mainly known for his part in the Third Crusade attempting to free Jerusalem from Muslim control. Although he had a large and important role in Medieval Europe, it is usually romanticized to increase the heroism of Richard. Richard’s prowess as a military leader, his benevolence and his sense of responsibility were all greatly exaggerated.

Read More
1001 Words | 5 Pages

He is known to have good morals, and as a good husband. Over the years, he has gained a lot of respect for his name. It is very hard for him to give up his good name, when everyone sees him as the good guy. For example, he had an affair with Abigail Williams. He could have used this as evidence to show that she is guilty and the many accused as witches or for witchcraft are innocent.

Read More
253 Words | 2 Pages

Edward I (17/18 June 1239 – 7 July 1307), also known as Edward Longshanks and the Hammer of the Scots (Latin: Malleus Scotorum), was King of England from 1272 to 1307. Before his accession to the throne, he was commonly referred to as The Lord Edward.[1] He spent much of his reign reforming royal administration and common law. Through an extensive legal inquiry, Edward investigated the tenure of various feudal liberties, while the law was reformed through a series of statutes regulating criminal and property law. Increasingly, however, Edward's attention was drawn towards military affairs.

Read More
1335 Words | 6 Pages

Edward 1V announced (on his death bed) that his brother Richard, Duke of Gloucester, was to be the Lord Protector until Edward,

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

Richard the Lionheart’s inadequate decision making as

Read More
391 Words | 2 Pages

The signing of the NAFTA agreement led to a high migration of Mexicans into the United States. Although there were restrictions in the migration process, a lot more people found their way into the US as compared to the time when NAFTA had not been ratified. This move seemed to benefit only the United States. There was a kind of exploitation of the poor Mexicans who went to seek employment opportunities in the American soil. Companies would hire the Mexicans in the lowly placed jobs and underpay them.

Read More
157 Words | 1 Pages

The manipulation in Richard III would work in our real lives not just in the play; Richard’s manipulation is realistic. Richard III shows the importance and the power of the manipulation to achieve the political power. Like Richard, not all, but most of people who work in politics use manipulation to accomplish their goal. For example, in Persepolis, Marjane’s uncle was arrested, sent to the jail, and finally executed. The government insists in the newspaper that her uncle was executed because he was a Russian spy, but the real reason is because he was against the government and did rebellion.

Read More
1571 Words | 7 Pages

Was Richard III Evil? Richard III was a power hungry king in the play of William Shakespeare. During the beginning of the play Richard III represents himself as a self-made criminal; he makes his malicious intention known in every speech to the audience. Richard works his way up to the throne by murdering his rivals. Was Richard III evil?

Read More
1267 Words | 6 Pages

Hamlet, one of the world’s most popular revenge tragedies, is a play written between 1599 and 1601 by renown playwright William Shakespeare. It tells a story of the royal family of Denmark plagued by corruption and schism. Prince Hamlet, the protagonist, embarks on a journey of incessant brooding and contemplation on whether to avenge his father’s death. In Hamlet’s soliloquy, at the end of Act 2, Scene 2, he asks himself, ‘Am I a coward?’ (II.ii.523) after failing to carry out revenge.

Read More
1328 Words | 6 Pages

After becoming King, Harold’s brother, Tostig Godwinson, pledged his allegiance to Harald Hadrada and invited him to come and claim the English throne. Harold Godwinson was the last Anglo-Saxon king of

Read More

More about Is Richard III Innocent Or Guilty

Related Topics

Open Document