ipl-logo

Ivan The Terrible Research Paper

1359 Words6 Pages

There are many words that have their meanings lost in translation from one language to another; one of those words is “terrible.” While English speakers tend to associate the words terrible with terms like atrocious, harrowing and revolting, the meaning of it in Russia, especially in the 16th century, was not that. To the Russians of that time, the definition of the word was closer to “formidable.” Now, introduce Ivan the Terrible, first Russian Tsar of Russia. While it speculated that Ivan the Terrible, otherwise known as Ivan IV, was cruel and manianical, he also achieved great things for Russia, which is why the term formidable seems to fit him better; as it is an all-encompassing word. Ivan the Terrible left his mark on Russia through …show more content…

Ivan’s father died in 1533 when Ivan was only 3. This made Ivan the prince, but since Ivan was too young to rule, there was a fight for power. When he was 8, he was completely orphaned. His guardians neglected him. Due to all of this, it’s speculated this is why he grew up to have cruel tendencies. He also had six wives and eight children; and most of them died in infancy. Many also believe he killed his oldest child in 1581 (Gazeta). As Ivan was growing up, he would often starve for long periods of time because of the feuding nobility, so he grew up with a strong hatred for them. Yet, at 16, he gained the title of the highest nobility of all - Tsar (Wheland). Ivan’s actions as Tsar seemed like the choices those nobilities he hated would have taken, such as starting large wars. Almost all of his actions in foreign policies were done to try to force Russia into Europe, and he used terror to do this. Ivan’s reign of terror and these choices in policies led to the weakening of every level of aristocrats, even parts that he had originally funded. While Ivan brought down the nobility in Russia, he also encouraged their cultural development, and was certainly a lively person, which shows that his childhood impacted him strongly in so many different and almost opposite

Show More
Related
740 Words | 3 Pages

1. How does the author describe Ivan III? How could he secure the domains of his father? Ivan III (Ivan the Great) is described as someone who skillfully created the Russian providence.

Read More
298 Words | 2 Pages

Ivan was the first Russian ruler to officially crown himself. He also married the beautiful Anastasia, related to an old boyar family. 1547 to 1560 are often called Ivan’s “good period.” He won great victories, gave Russia a code of laws, and ruled justly and equally, or however equal that was normal in the 1500’s. Ivan’s “bad period” began in 1560 after Anastasia died.

Read More
301 Words | 2 Pages

Russia has had numerous rulers throughout history. Two of the rulers stick out in particular. They used similar strategies to get their ways. They used their power to control others. These two rulers did similar things to get their way.

Read More
309 Words | 2 Pages

Its was expected of him since his grandfather Ivan III made the Grand Duchy of Moscow into a dominant Russian state and was affecting the ruler of Russia. Ivan IV ruled from 1547-1584 when his mental capabilities stated to decline and affect his reign. Since his chosen heir dyed, Simeon Bekbulatovich was commander of main regiment of the Livonian war and appointed grand prince of all Russia. Later

Read More
178 Words | 1 Pages

Part A: Two continuities that Ivan III, Ivan the IV, Peter the Great and Catherine the Great used to consolidate their political power over Russia was the use to religion and military support to gain more power. Ivan III thought that the smart way to consolidate his power would be to organize a strong army which held an emphasis on military and to also tie in religion and nationalism to gather and gain support for his campaigns. This also can be shown how Peter the Great created a stronger and more organized military and also improved weaponry. Another continuity was through expansion which all these leaders did. When Ivan III gained control he chose to unify city states and make ongoing changes which showed how Russia was growing and changing.

Read More
1224 Words | 5 Pages

Furthermore, Nicholas allowed his country to enter two wars, the Russo-Japanese war and WWI, Russia being ill-prepared for the wars both times. The battles did not go well in either of the wars and his actions dealt great suffering to the people of Russia, especially the minority, or lower class. Although his country was in peril and he knew it, he refused to implement reforms. Tsar Nicholas II truly wanted to aid his country although his inexperience did not allow him to do so. Hence, this led to the murder of his family and the end of 3 centuries of Romanov ruling when the Bolsheviks took power of Russia.

Read More
696 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout Russia’s history, there have been many rulers that tried to manage their country in different ways. Even though, all of these rulers had their own unique ways of ruling, all of them were seen as terrible by the people. This eventually led to a tipping point for the Russian citizens and the Russian Revolution took place. The goal for these people was to gain freedom from their oppressive czar but instead, they got an even worse leader. Joseph Stalin was a leader of the Soviet Union from 1929 to 1953 and he was known for his ability to strike fear into people.

Read More
1052 Words | 5 Pages

Maybe he thought that by copying other successful tsars he could be one too. He much preferred spending time with his wife and children, a devoted ‘family man’, as shown in source 7, a royal portrait. The Russian economy was also declining and crumbling because of factors out of his control such as a series of failed crop seasons, which caused a lack of food sources, leading to inflation. There were also some political factors which may have led to the end of the dynasty, like the faulty legal system, which had no formal court of appeals who could look at and assess the Tsar’s laws. I also find it hard to believe that one person alone could cause such a downfall of a long established line of rulers, after all there were plenty equally, if not more, incompetent Romanov tsars who didn’t cause the collapse of the family.

Read More
679 Words | 3 Pages

He experienced the brutal losses of his family, along with everything he owns, his faith, and almost his sanity. Many hundreds of miles away in 1570, a Russian tzar named Ivan IV Vasilyevich, better known now as Ivan the Terrible from an arguably more accurate mistranslation of his title “The Severe”, waged a massacre on the independently-minded city of Novgorod, lasting only five weeks yet leaving thousands dead; though the city’s population could not have been more than 100,000, around 30,000 were murdered, leaving 20,000 more to perish from the aftermath (Erenow, “ Massacre- Ivan The Terrible”).

Read More
1649 Words | 7 Pages

The Rurik dynasty ended in disarray, and the civil turmoil that followed precipitated the beginning of the Romanov dynasty. As explained in the video analysis of the Romanov family’s demise, the death of Fyodor I, the last ruler of the Rurik dynasty in 1598, brought on a 15 year period of chaos and madness in Russia (Downfall of the Romanov Family). Additionally, this 15 year period was called The Time of Troubles where foreign interventions, peasant uprisings, political disputes caused social and economic disruptions which threatened the survival of the state (Downfall of the Romanov Family). Ivan the Terrible’s brutal actions formed the basis of the Romanov dynasty. When Ivan the Terrible murdered his son and unborn grandson, he died without an heir, which resulted in the formation of a new dynasty– the Romanov dynasty.

Read More
183 Words | 1 Pages

“He was Tsar Nicholas II of Russia: the wealthiest Monarch on the world, who ruled over 130 million people and one-sixth of the earth’s land surface, yet turned a blind eye to the abject poverty of his subjects.” - Candace Fleming. The Romanovs ruled over Russia for 300 years; once Nicholas II came to power, it all collapsed. World War I and different instances in 1917 provoked the Russian Revolution to into play. The Russian Revolution then made Nicholas II abdicate the throne, the Bolsheviks rose to power after that. Then on July 17, 1918 Nicholas II, his family, and servants were executed in the cellar of the prison house.

Read More
695 Words | 3 Pages

This envy and vindictiveness for what the people around him have leads him to acquire more materialistic items that do not necessarily bring him happiness. His life flows pleasantly this way until he reaches a threat that takes away his control. In order for a person to be content at the end of their life is “ if we are in control of our careers, mates, children, and bodies, [then] we can live a predictable and powerful life” (Sansom 419). As Ivan loses control of his environment, the thought of death and losing his possessions makes him scared of death. His life amounts to nothing more than chaos, where “the assumed defense against chaos is more control of relationships, job, environment, emotions, and future” (Sansom 419).

Read More
972 Words | 4 Pages

Some may know cheerleading as an issue of young ladies moving and cheering for a run of the mill football or b-ball game. An alternate way some may picture cheerleading is likened to the visual of the Dallas Rancher team dancers. This is one in which hairspray and cleavage govern the field rather than the players numerous dance leads battle to be. While there are two separate sorts of cheerleading, I might want to look at a couple of parts of the action, which I accept are the most critical to demonstrate that cheerleading ought to be viewed as a game in America. There is an amazing level of physicality in cutting edge cheerleading that parallels that of numerous other perceived games.

Read More
712 Words | 3 Pages

Tolstoy portrays to us that Ivan’s life is soon coming to an end by providing us (readers) with many recollections and details from his childhood. Tolstoy also demonstrates how Ivan will die without truly living because he never thought about how death would turn the corner and take him and never lived his own, unique life. Throughout his adulthood, Ivan made choices and completed actions, not for his own sake, but because that is what society accepted, and he wanted to be accepted by society. The details in Ivan’s life are present, but he doesn’t notice those details and goes right along with his work and card games; never showing any emotion towards practically anything in his life.

Read More
779 Words | 4 Pages

Through his role model of a true leader and his great charisma he influenced the Russian citizens to contribute towards his vision of a greater Russia. Vladimir Putin is seen, as a strong leader with brilliant psychological skills that had the power and will to make the decisions and take crazy risks, which he thought, was right for Russian citizens. He was highly people oriented since he new the culture and came from the same background as many Russian individuals and he new what they exactly needed and wanted in a president. But on the contrary his management background helped him to direct and control the Russian citizens by coordinating and harmonizing them to accomplish a mutual goal that was based on their needs and wants. Vladimir Putin created strategies, policies based on the Russian culture, values and views.

Read More

More about Ivan The Terrible Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document