ipl-logo

Ivan The Terrible Research Paper

1359 Words6 Pages

There are many words that have their meanings lost in translation from one language to another; one of those words is “terrible.” While English speakers tend to associate the words terrible with terms like atrocious, harrowing and revolting, the meaning of it in Russia, especially in the 16th century, was not that. To the Russians of that time, the definition of the word was closer to “formidable.” Now, introduce Ivan the Terrible, first Russian Tsar of Russia. While it speculated that Ivan the Terrible, otherwise known as Ivan IV, was cruel and manianical, he also achieved great things for Russia, which is why the term formidable seems to fit him better; as it is an all-encompassing word. Ivan the Terrible left his mark on Russia through …show more content…

Ivan’s father died in 1533 when Ivan was only 3. This made Ivan the prince, but since Ivan was too young to rule, there was a fight for power. When he was 8, he was completely orphaned. His guardians neglected him. Due to all of this, it’s speculated this is why he grew up to have cruel tendencies. He also had six wives and eight children; and most of them died in infancy. Many also believe he killed his oldest child in 1581 (Gazeta). As Ivan was growing up, he would often starve for long periods of time because of the feuding nobility, so he grew up with a strong hatred for them. Yet, at 16, he gained the title of the highest nobility of all - Tsar (Wheland). Ivan’s actions as Tsar seemed like the choices those nobilities he hated would have taken, such as starting large wars. Almost all of his actions in foreign policies were done to try to force Russia into Europe, and he used terror to do this. Ivan’s reign of terror and these choices in policies led to the weakening of every level of aristocrats, even parts that he had originally funded. While Ivan brought down the nobility in Russia, he also encouraged their cultural development, and was certainly a lively person, which shows that his childhood impacted him strongly in so many different and almost opposite

Show More
Related

Explain How Ivan III How Could He Secure The Domains Of His Father

740 Words | 3 Pages

To conquer the principality of Tver, he directly invaded but in the Yaroslavl and Rostov principalities he bought off the great princes of those countries. In conquering Novgorod, his most notable gathered principality, he invaded during their time of trouble and took control. Once he had control he deported boyars, merchants, and executed many. In regard to the land he seized, he gave it to individuals who would take care of the land for Ivan, and they knew their land was given to them on conditional release. His other conquest (specifically, Lithuanian) would lead to the Russian involvement of war with their Western rivals and neighbors.

Read More

Analysis Of The Russian Czars-Absolute Monarchs

298 Words | 2 Pages

Ivan was the first Russian ruler to officially crown himself. He also married the beautiful Anastasia, related to an old boyar family. 1547 to 1560 are often called Ivan’s “good period.” He won great victories, gave Russia a code of laws, and ruled justly and equally, or however equal that was normal in the 1500’s. Ivan’s “bad period” began in 1560 after Anastasia died.

Read More

Summary Of Nicholas II: Twilight Of The Empire By Dominic Lieven

658 Words | 3 Pages

In the historical monograph Nicholas II: Twilight of the Empire, Dominic Lieven revisits the life and times of the last emperor of Russia and the Romanov dynasty—Nicholas II. Lieven analyzes Nicholas II’s life experiences from early childhood to his death during the Bolshevik Revolution. With the conviction that past studies on Nicholas II and the fall of the Russian Empire have been insufficient for better understanding the tsar’s true role in the context of his time. Lieven argues that Nicholas II was not strictly a stupid or incompetent leader, who single handedly brought and end to the Russian autocracy. Instead, Lieven suggests that numerous decisions made by the Russian tsar were in many circumstances reasonable—when considering Russia’s political, social, and economic contexts.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Ivan Iv And Putin

301 Words | 2 Pages

Russia has had numerous rulers throughout history. Two of the rulers stick out in particular. They used similar strategies to get their ways. They used their power to control others. These two rulers did similar things to get their way.

Read More

The Romanov Family: Standing For Imperial Russia

309 Words | 2 Pages

Its was expected of him since his grandfather Ivan III made the Grand Duchy of Moscow into a dominant Russian state and was affecting the ruler of Russia. Ivan IV ruled from 1547-1584 when his mental capabilities stated to decline and affect his reign. Since his chosen heir dyed, Simeon Bekbulatovich was commander of main regiment of the Livonian war and appointed grand prince of all Russia. Later

Read More

Discuss The Changes And Continuities Of Ivan III

178 Words | 1 Pages

Part A: Two continuities that Ivan III, Ivan the IV, Peter the Great and Catherine the Great used to consolidate their political power over Russia was the use to religion and military support to gain more power. Ivan III thought that the smart way to consolidate his power would be to organize a strong army which held an emphasis on military and to also tie in religion and nationalism to gather and gain support for his campaigns. This also can be shown how Peter the Great created a stronger and more organized military and also improved weaponry. Another continuity was through expansion which all these leaders did. When Ivan III gained control he chose to unify city states and make ongoing changes which showed how Russia was growing and changing.

Read More

1917 Revolution Dbq

1224 Words | 5 Pages

Furthermore, Nicholas allowed his country to enter two wars, the Russo-Japanese war and WWI, Russia being ill-prepared for the wars both times. The battles did not go well in either of the wars and his actions dealt great suffering to the people of Russia, especially the minority, or lower class. Although his country was in peril and he knew it, he refused to implement reforms. Tsar Nicholas II truly wanted to aid his country although his inexperience did not allow him to do so. Hence, this led to the murder of his family and the end of 3 centuries of Romanov ruling when the Bolsheviks took power of Russia.

Read More

Joseph Stalin Dbq Essay

696 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout Russia’s history, there have been many rulers that tried to manage their country in different ways. Even though, all of these rulers had their own unique ways of ruling, all of them were seen as terrible by the people. This eventually led to a tipping point for the Russian citizens and the Russian Revolution took place. The goal for these people was to gain freedom from their oppressive czar but instead, they got an even worse leader. Joseph Stalin was a leader of the Soviet Union from 1929 to 1953 and he was known for his ability to strike fear into people.

Read More

Was Tsar Nicholas Responsible For The Collapse Of The Romanov Dynasty?

1052 Words | 5 Pages

Maybe he thought that by copying other successful tsars he could be one too. He much preferred spending time with his wife and children, a devoted ‘family man’, as shown in source 7, a royal portrait. The Russian economy was also declining and crumbling because of factors out of his control such as a series of failed crop seasons, which caused a lack of food sources, leading to inflation. There were also some political factors which may have led to the end of the dynasty, like the faulty legal system, which had no formal court of appeals who could look at and assess the Tsar’s laws. I also find it hard to believe that one person alone could cause such a downfall of a long established line of rulers, after all there were plenty equally, if not more, incompetent Romanov tsars who didn’t cause the collapse of the family.

Read More

Examples Of Dehumanization In Night By Elie Wiesel

679 Words | 3 Pages

He experienced the brutal losses of his family, along with everything he owns, his faith, and almost his sanity. Many hundreds of miles away in 1570, a Russian tzar named Ivan IV Vasilyevich, better known now as Ivan the Terrible from an arguably more accurate mistranslation of his title “The Severe”, waged a massacre on the independently-minded city of Novgorod, lasting only five weeks yet leaving thousands dead; though the city’s population could not have been more than 100,000, around 30,000 were murdered, leaving 20,000 more to perish from the aftermath (Erenow, “ Massacre- Ivan The Terrible”).

Read More

Why Did The Romanov Dynasty Fall Apart In The 1900

1649 Words | 7 Pages

Thus, Russia had finally become a great power, which would continue its conquests in Europe and Asia, primarily in Siberia.” (The Rise and Fall of a

Read More

How Did Tsar Nicholas 2 Changed Russia

183 Words | 1 Pages

The fall of the Romanov Monarch changed Russia immensely. Nicholas II came to power when his father died on October

Read More

Tolstoy Death Of Ivan Ilych Analysis

695 Words | 3 Pages

This envy and vindictiveness for what the people around him have leads him to acquire more materialistic items that do not necessarily bring him happiness. His life flows pleasantly this way until he reaches a threat that takes away his control. In order for a person to be content at the end of their life is “ if we are in control of our careers, mates, children, and bodies, [then] we can live a predictable and powerful life” (Sansom 419). As Ivan loses control of his environment, the thought of death and losing his possessions makes him scared of death. His life amounts to nothing more than chaos, where “the assumed defense against chaos is more control of relationships, job, environment, emotions, and future” (Sansom 419).

Read More

Czar Nicholas II: The Russian Revolution

462 Words | 2 Pages

Although many will argue that Lenin’s good leadership, that led to his exile, was the reason the Russian Revolution started, Nicholas II made so many crucial mistakes that outweigh the decisions of Lenin. Having more of a positive impact, “Lenin began skillfully growing his power within the Bolsheviks. He was so successful in doing this that the government grew afraid of him, and he was exiled two years later” (“The”). The passage shows that Lenin did more good than bad, and on the other hand Nicholas II was never headed in a good

Read More

Theme Of Detail In The Death Of Ivan Ilyich

712 Words | 3 Pages

Tolstoy portrays to us that Ivan’s life is soon coming to an end by providing us (readers) with many recollections and details from his childhood. Tolstoy also demonstrates how Ivan will die without truly living because he never thought about how death would turn the corner and take him and never lived his own, unique life. Throughout his adulthood, Ivan made choices and completed actions, not for his own sake, but because that is what society accepted, and he wanted to be accepted by society. The details in Ivan’s life are present, but he doesn’t notice those details and goes right along with his work and card games; never showing any emotion towards practically anything in his life.

Read More

More about Ivan The Terrible Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document