The Rogerian Method was created to mediate the two opposing sides of an argument into an agreeable solution. Jane Willy used the method to settle the dispute over the usage of American Indian tribes as mascots. Although she makes a solid resolution, Willy fails to correctly write all parts of the Rogerian Method which are essential to keep the pacifist approach that comes with this method. The opposition to Jane insists that using American Indians as mascots is slanderous to their people. Jane Willy thinks that it is okay to use American Indians as mascots, so long as it is with good intentions.
Hilary Weaver argues in her piece of writing; that identifying indigenous identity is complex, complicated, and hard to grasp when internalized oppression and colonization has turned Native Americans to criticize one another. Throughout the text, Weaver focuses on three main points which she calls, the three facets. Self-identification, community identification, and external identification are all important factors that make up Native American identity. The author uses a story she calls, “The Big game” to support her ideologies and arguments about the issue of identity. After reading the article, it’s important to realize that Native American’s must decide their own history and not leave that open for non-natives to write about.
There are many factors that effect Native Americans such as treaty rights, health, education, and economic issues, a number of studies done by various government agencies, including the Department of Justice, have shown extremely troubling rates of violent crime inflicted on American Indian peoples, most by non-Natives, as well as a suicide incidence among American Indian children and young adults that is several times that of other ethnic groups or the general population. However, Native Americans representation through mascots and logos is an issue that effects the Native people in a more personal way. Native Americans sport team logos, mascots and nicknames are representing Native Americans in a disrespectful way which is effecting the way we perceive
Native American culture and history has been used for the enjoyment of audiences over many years in film, literature, television, and other forms of media. Not surprisingly, directors and writers hardly ever portray Native Americans accurately. In the play, “Foghorn” by Hanay Geiogamah, and in Mary Tallmoutain’s poem The Last Wolf, reader scan trace their influence into modern day media, even though almost none of it is accurate.
When Saul plays hockey, he is not solely judged on his abilities as a player, but as an Indigenous player where he faces the use of stereotypes as a way to degrade him. The constant humiliation and harassment experienced by Saul can have devastating effects on one’s mental health and can give rise to unhealthy coping mechanisms such as alcoholism. Comparatively, racism is portrayed in The Inconvenient Indian when Thomas King discusses the history of Indigenous portrayal in Hollywood
In Tommy Orange's novel “There, There” we are introduced to twelve characters that explore the complexities of identity for Native American people in the city of Oakland. By reflecting on the characters, we meet throughout the novel and examining their perspectives on Native American identity, we can deepen our understanding of the issues faced by urban Native Americans. Throughout the novel, we explore themes such as colonialism, federal policies, education, language, and racism. These allow us to gain insight into the struggles and resilience of the characters in “There, There”. This novel has helped deepen my understanding of the struggles that Native Americans face today because of each of the characters struggles.
People are starting to wonder if using these kinds of names are appropriate or offensive to the tribe the team is named after. The debate raises this question: should Indian names and mascots be allowed in sports? In the article “Indian Mascots—You’re Out” by Jack Shakely (2011), the author tries to convince his audience that the use of
The T-Shirt: The Annihilation of the Native Americans Throughout the history of the United States, we have seen the United States as both the inflictor and the victim. Whether it was the USA as the victim against the British Regime or the USA as the inflictor during the brutal extensive period of slavery, these historical periods of time have been recognized and accounted for by the government. However, there is one period of American history that seems to be overlooked and that is the annihilation and genocide of the Native American people. With the production of this short film, I believe Shelly Niro is trying to depict through the use of multiple production elements, the lack of responsibility, accountability and compensation for the Native
The Redskins, an American Football Team, needs to change their name. For years, many Native Americans have complained of the Redskins’ name being racist towards them. They say it does not hold honor to them, it instead reduces them to their skin color and how the pilgrims saw them as. The oppression that this nation has put their culture and people through must be addressed. In 1858, the government had directly taken the reserves given to the Native Americans for resources the nation had wanted.
Did you know that there are 2,128 Native American mascots in the world that people are not discussing? Recently, more and more people are becoming aware of Native American mascots because there is a debate surging with respect to that field. For many years there has been controversy about banning Native American mascots and names. Native American mascots and names should be banned from sports. First of all, it is very disrespectful to the Native American tribe.
For the past few decades there has been a debate raging in American sports culture about the use of Native American names in sports. Teams like the Washington Redskins and several other professional and college teams have been criticized for using Native American names as mascots and team names. Some people criticize the names and say that it’s offensive and demeaning and should be changed. Others say that the names honor Native American heritage have been a team tradition for many years and should not be changed. Sports teams should not use Native American names as trademarks or mascots because they promote negative stereotypes of Native Americans in society.
Their trip to retrieve Victor’s father’s remains became a metaphor for exploring their identities and reconnecting with their community and heritage. The story blends modern challenges with traditional elements, highlighting the tension between the past and the present. The recurring theme of identity and cultural continuity is evident across these stories. Each author discusses how Native Americans navigate their cultural identity in a world where pressures to assimilate and loss of tradition are common.
The first television series on the NBC network starred a Native American as a law enforcer of white law and order. Now, Native Americans were viewed as civilized men. More films were made that promoted Native Americans. Though the positive stereotypes were introduced, it still didn’t warrant problems. In the 1971 Advertising Council’s Keep America Beautiful public service announcement is sincere, it still confines the Native American chief to the past, as he is representing a by-gone era and a by-gone people.
The invisibility of Native peoples and lack of positive images of Native cultures may not register as a problem for many Americans, but it poses a significant challenge for Native youth who want to maintain a foundation in their culture and language. " - NCAI President Brian Cladoosby (April 2014 - Washington Post
Steven, The way the Native Americans were treated is something that America does like to hide. As you stated, America was not free to the Native Americans. The American ideals of “freedom” and “democracy” didn’t extended to them. The ideals were for the white Americans. It is really is hard not to criticize what America has done in the past.
