ipl-logo

Jehovah's Interpretation Of The Watch Tower Society

4234 Words17 Pages

Jehovah’s Witness (JW) as a religion originated near Pittsburg, PA in the 1872 and was founded by Charles T. Russell and is based on a literal millennialist interpretation of the Bible. The Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society also know as the Watch Tower Society (WTS) was set up by the elders to direct, oversee and develop religious dogma. It acts as the legal organization of the congregation today. It was not until 1945 that the WTS established the doctrine that blood transfusions were not in keeping with the scriptures. The WTS leaders based their decision on the literal interpretation of Bible verses, specifically: “Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things. But flesh with …show more content…

1) Autonomy/ Self-determination: Respect for an individual’s independent decisions and choices; 2) Beneficence: requires the maximizing of benefits and minimizing of harm; 3) Nonmaleficence: prevent harm and promote health and quality of life; 4) Justice: Unbiased distribution of benefits, risks and costs. In the United States, the law upholds the patient’s autonomy to a greater extent than the other 3 principles. The principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence have used by healthcare workers to justify their ethical stand against JW (Sommerville). Refusal of blood by a surgical, trauma or emergently bleeding patient increases his/her mortality and morbidity as they could suffer a stroke, have a prolonged complicated hospital course or could even die Healthcare providers also have their own individual moral beliefs and values, violation of which can lead to anxieties, stress, guilt and suffering. It has to be kept in mind though, that however irrational one might think the JW doctrine is, a devout JW truly believes that they will forgo eternal salvation upon receiving a blood transfusion. Therefore a JW considers withholding blood as an act of beneficence even when they have to choose death over life.

Show More
Related
1056 Words | 5 Pages

Saunders challenges the negative moral perception of opt-out organ donation system by challenging the Kantian moral value, where is it difficult for one to realize whether he or she had done right thing if it is harder or more costly to you. He gives some twisted examples of making the donation system difficult for the donors to go through series of testing and have them pay fees to make the donating much more a difficult task to fit the Kant’s description of Moral worth action. By offering this ridiculous example, he is trying to make the point that when it comes down to organ donation, where it is to save lives of the others in needs, there is no reason to distinguish the moral value the one will get by donating his or her organ either under opt-in system, “difficult system”, or Opt-out system, “Easier System”. He also makes his point that people who decides to donate their organ, when it is easy for them to decide, assuming that they know that they are in terminal condition in death bed or what not, it doesn’t show moral worthy of the person as well.

Read More
1953 Words | 8 Pages

Gill argues that keeping a person healthy cannot be a physician’s only moral duty because in cases of terminal ill patients, they can no longer be treated or healed (372). If a physician’s only duty were to heal patients then they would not tend to the terminally ill because there would be nothing else that they could do, which is something that most people would find to be morally wrong (Gill, 373). No one would be okay with a doctor not helping a person at all who has received a terminal sentence. So instead of promoting health in this case, the physicians must find a way to reduce the suffering of the patient. This means that the physician should be able to reduce the suffering in the way that the patient asks for.

Read More
642 Words | 3 Pages

The ethical principle of autonomy provides for respect for the patient’s autonomy to make decisions and choices concerning their life and death. Respecting the patient’s autonomy goes against the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence. There also exists the issue of religious beliefs the patient, family, or the caretaker holds, with which the caretaker has to grapple. The caretaker thus faces issues of fidelity to patient welfare by not abandoning the patient or their family, compassionate provision of pain relief methods, and the moral precept to neither hasten death nor prolong life.

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

The People’s Temple and Branch Davidian groups are two very different entities. Jim Jones founds People’s Temple in Indiana under the banner of equality for all ages, races, and genders, and David Koresh takes control of the existing Branch Davidian group in Waco Texas and changes the group into a study on the Book of Revelation and the seven seals to serve his wants. Both of these groups hold different ideals for what perfect society should be like, but even though the utopian visions of People’s Temple the Branch Davidians are different, the way these groups go about achieving their goals during their times are extremely similar. Even though both groups are apocalyptic in nature with themes of death and catastrophe surrounding their ends,

Read More
1167 Words | 5 Pages

Relevant legal and ethical considerations, focusing on the 4 main ethical principles and how each of these apply to this case using research evidence. Focusing on the ethical theory of Beauchamp and Childress, it is considered one of the most fundamental elements for beginning a discussion in the Not for resuscitation (NFR) debate. (Fornari, 2015). The four main ethical principles, autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence and justice hold the grounding block for issues of this nature. End of life care is an imperative characteristic of acute stroke nursing, as stroke mortality rates remain high, regardless of enhancements in the health care industry.

Read More
1400 Words | 6 Pages

People are required to make ethical decisions every day. These decisions can greatly impact their future. What is important to some people may have little or no value to others. A person with a Christian worldview would base their ethical dilemma decision on their beliefs and the instructions that God’s word provides.

Read More
885 Words | 4 Pages

A student from the Michigan University (2007) defines Bioethics as an activity which is a shared, reflective examination of ethical issues in health care, health science, and health policy. These fields have always had ethical standards, of course, handed down within each profession, and often without question. Hence, the discussion of this standards is called Bioethics. This discussions takes place in the media, in the academy, in classrooms, in labs, offices, and hospital wards. The conversation is often sparked by new developments, like the possibility of cloning.

Read More
763 Words | 4 Pages

Student’s name: Damodar Uprety Date: 04/05/2017 Topic: Blood Donation Rhetorical Purpose: To persuade Specific Purpose: To inform my audience about the growing and never diminishing demand of human whole blood supply and to encourage or motivate them to be a regular blood donors to meet this demand with consistent supply at all times to save our fellow Americans who are in desperate need of blood transfusion. Thesis: The magnitude of blood demand is high in USA as well as the whole world; therefore all eligible donors should donate blood regularly, not only when it seems important enough. A pint of blood mean life to some and its absence mean their death.

Read More
1217 Words | 5 Pages

Organ donation is currently the only successful way of saving the lives of patients with organ failure and other diseases that require a new organ altogether. According to the U.S Department of Health and Human Services there is currently 122,566 patients both actively and passively on the transplant list. This number will continue to increase, in fact, every ten minutes another person is added to the list. Unfortunately, twenty-two of these people die while waiting for an organ on a daily basis. Each day, about eighty Americans receive a lifesaving organ transplant.

Read More
870 Words | 4 Pages

Patient autonomy argues that a person’s life is their own, allowing a patient to make decisions on whether to live or die. This is seen most strongly in cases where people are suffering severe pain or disability. However, to what extend is individual autonomy to be undermined? In our current model, the guidelines for determining the competency of a patient present too many holes. Therefore, allowing life and death decisions to rest on individual autonomy rejects our society’s basic attitude or respect for

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

The tem ethics refers to the moral principles that guide a person’s behavior, with respect to the rightness and wrongness of their actions. In the field of nursing, these moral principles govern the relationship between the nurse and the patient, members of the healthcare team, and society at large. Nurses must constantly question whether a certain procedure or course of treatment is in the best interest of the patient. When viewing the film “Miss Evers’ Boys”, it was clear that the doctors, researchers, and even Miss Evers were not acting in the best interest of all the patients. This movie depicted true events of a study that took place in Macon County, Alabama, in 1932.

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

People who are involved in these can suffer just as much as the patient. The choices bear on the good of the population, doctors are supposed to help your health, knowledge, and friendships. They are taught to save lives not to take them away. They are taught to act against anything that brings harm towards the person. To end someone’s life even for a better end shows what someone thinks of human life.

Read More
418 Words | 2 Pages

Ethical Complexity of Distribute Justice and Rationing Medicine is a practice based on moral standards applied to clinical values and judgments, also known as medical ethics. Ethical values consists of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy and justice. However, these ethical principles are affected when distributive justice and rationing of health care resources are implemented “…in a world in which need is boundless but resources are not…” (Scheunemann & White, 2011, p. 1630). The historic Hippocratic Oath described the four main principles of medical practice and established a moral conduct for clinicians. Beneficence demands that health care providers develop and maintain skills and knowledge, consider individual circumstances of all patients, and strive for the patient’s benefit.

Read More
869 Words | 4 Pages

All healthcare providers follow the Hippocratic Oath that has been used for centuries to set out guidelines for our doctors and nurses and in the original version it states “I will not give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect”. In the modern version it states “Above all, I must not play God”. Just in these two sentences all caretakers partaking in this practice have directly broken their promise. Also religion and the role of God is completely taken advantage of when the patient decides to end their life themselves. Julia Angelotti’s views concor with mine when she says that breaking the Hippocratic oath is “immoral” and “probably illegal” (Angelotti).

Read More
1610 Words | 7 Pages

Ethics can be explained as principles a society develops to guide decisions about what is right and wrong. Ethical principles that society has are influenced by religion, history, and experience of the people in the group. Meaning that ethics is based on guidelines we have learned while growing up, that helps us differentiates what is right and what is wrong. For example, some people think health care should be a human right as others think it should only be available to those who can pay for it. Each group of people is guided by the principles they believe in.

Read More

More about Jehovah's Interpretation Of The Watch Tower Society

Related Topics

Open Document