ipl-logo

Jewelry Wholesale V. Jennifer Lawson For Breach Of Contract

1046 Words5 Pages

Memorandum
To: Attorney of Jennifer Lawson
From: Jackson Biegler
Date: October 7, 2017
Re: Greene’s Jewelry Wholesale v. Jennifer Lawson for Breach of Contract
Application of the Law to the Facts
Greene’s defense should build its case around precedence and law while being shielded by public policy. Greene’s defensive position is precise and to the point, as Greene’s is in the process of suing Ms. Lawson for her part in breach of confidentiality for contacting Howell shortly after being fired from their company. Ms. Lawson offered to work for Howell, a direct competitor of Greene’s and provided Howell with confidential information about Ever-gold. In doing so, Ms. Lawson violated the NEW HAMPSHIRE TRADE SECRET LAW – EXPLAIN with a quotation. …show more content…

Lawson.
Case to Consider for Ms. Lawson’s Position
Juarez v. AutoZone: Rosario Juarez worked at AutoZone for five years and was fired for claiming that woman was given a glass ceiling for promotions along with an unfair hiring process that deterred a woman from getting jobs at the company. The company suggested that Ms. Juarez step down for not being able to take care of her son and work for the company simultaneously. In the end, Ms. Juarez got awarded 185 million in punitive damages, which at the time was the most ever granted to a single employee (Juarez v. AutoZone).
It is vital for Greene’s to know the cases that will be presented to the public eye that will get the public rallied against them. This way they can shoot down allegations as these instances vary immensely.
Alleviating the Potential Damages for …show more content…

Ways to mitigate potential damages include: quickly settling outside of court before the public gets a hold of the information and going to trial, spending lots of money on a defense and being found not liable for damages against Ms. Lawson. Settling outside of court could be costly and portrayed by the public as guilty, while on the other hand, defending in court could be just as costly in attorney fees and even more costly if ultimately being found guilty. Would she risk it for a chance at winning in court, or would she settle outside of court for a sum of money? Ms. Lawson knows for a fact that she violated a breach of confidentiality agreements with Greene’s by letting Howell in on the plans for Ever-gold which allowed Howell to create a lookalike Ever-gold product and bring it to the marketplace, so Ms. Lawson should be careful with her approach to the matter at

Show More
Related
605 Words | 3 Pages

The second trial I attended was a personal injury civil jury trial with Judge Carrier. This was a rather interesting case of Jennifer Wolfe VS D & W LLC. Within this case, Jennifer Wolfe attended a bachelorette party eight years ago with her now sister-in-law, who was the maid of honor. The story started out with everyone meeting at a house and the maid of honor was mad that the designated person to bring alcohol, forgot to bring the alcohol. The alcohol drank at this house was whatever was there, which was a few beers and a box of wine.

Read More
470 Words | 2 Pages

In the case of Gallina v. Mintz Levin, Gallina male co-workers were made discriminatory comments after finding out that she had a young child (Walsh, 2013). Gallina spoke with others in the firm and partners in another office firm (Walsh, 2013). The partners that shared the offices with Gallina were upset to hear that she had seeked others thoughts and opinions on the matter at hand (Walsh, 2013). Gallina was eventually terminated based terminated based upon the evaluations that were negative from the partners in her office, even though the other partner outside firm had given her great evaluations (Walsh, 2013). Gallina falls under a protected class through the Title VII, Civil Rights Act.

Read More
384 Words | 2 Pages

An employee has the right to work in a safe environment, one that is free from hazards that could lead to serious harm. Causing dissention and the hostile work environment for employees created the potential for a violent incident to occur. At the very least, the potential for a costly mistake due to duress they were under, which could have caused physical harm. The defendants’ faced discrimination and retaliation based on their race. This appalling treatment violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and by doing so, invoked the Civil Rights Act of 1991 allowing the monetary damages

Read More
465 Words | 2 Pages

Campers Discount Warehouse: The Discount Warehouse duty to act with reasonable care was breached because they cooking stoves where not placed properly, which resulted in it falling on Laura. If the Discount Warehouse were more cautious on how they stack there merchandise Laura would have suffered no harm. Since the Warehouse was negligent, it resulted in Laura having a loss of consortium, meaning physical intimacy, loss of enjoyment of life, wage/income. Also Laura has the costs of medical expenses, living with the disability, and mental distress. Laura v. Hospital: I would advise Laura to sue the hospital for negligence, and damages since she lost her valuable engagement gifts (necklace and ring).

Read More
299 Words | 2 Pages

1. Case Cite: [Nafta Traders, Inc. v. Quinn, 339 S.W.3d 84 (Tex. 2011)] 2. Facts: In Nafta Traders, an employee sued her employer for sex discrimination in violation of state law. The dispute was sent to arbitration, where the employee prevailed. The employer demanded the award in court, disputing that it has damages that were either not allowed or for which there was no evidence.

Read More
353 Words | 2 Pages

Why do you believe these actions were discriminatory? The first case file with EECO by Tanya Conde girl friend of Samuel Varriano Maintenance #3 who was fired from Pitt University .The defendent 's in case Robert Godzik, William Franicola supervisor and Pitt University was dismissed . Now Robert Godzik and Pitt University have confidence themselves this isn 't a hostile work environment .With

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

COMM 3310 – LEGAL CASE BRIEF Citation: Name of the case — Eramo v. Rolling Stone Case Published — The New York Times Date Published — Nov. 7, 2016 Level of Court — Federal Court Chapter or area of communication law that your brief applies to — Libel/Defamation. FACTS: Plaintiff, Nicole P. Eramo sued and won a libel lawsuit against the Rolling Stone, Wenner Media—Rolling Stone’s fellow company, and journalist Sabrina Rubin Erdely over an article published in November 2014 called, “A Rape on Campus” in regards to a rape situation at the University of Virginia (“UVA”). According to Eramo vs. Rolling Stone complaint, the plaintiff, Eramo’s argument was that her reputation was damaged through the media over false information about her involvement

Read More
424 Words | 2 Pages

(Cornell Law, 1983)

Read More
813 Words | 4 Pages

Cosplay victim shot by police. A 22 year old black man named Darrien Hunt was shot by two police officers in Saratoga Springs, Utah. He was cosplaying as a character from Afro Samurai and was carrying a dull sword replica. The police claimed he charged at them while brandishing the sword, but the autopsy report and security footage from a bank camera may confirm that Darrien was shot six times from behind. In “Utah Victim was fleeing, Autopsy finds.”

Read More
691 Words | 3 Pages

Bernard and Babette Butkis Testimony Bernard and Babette Buskins present a plethora of potential wrong doings by a third party in this case their employer Richard A. Ryound. Dissecting the Butkis’s testimony allows for a one sided, well determined completion of arguments in favor and against their testimony. Beginning with their posture in their initial statement, creating a comprehensive objective argument, and effectively determining the outcome of the case through civil court action. Bernard and Babette Buskins present several factual realities that affected their life directly.

Read More
345 Words | 2 Pages

Anne Elizabeth Cohen is Of Counsel to Debevoise & Plimpton LLP. , having retired as a Partner from the firm’s Litigation Department in 2013. For almost twenty-eight years, her wide-ranging practice focused on complex tort litigation and internal investigations and she represented defendants in firearms, Agent Orange, smoking and health, toxic shock syndrome, pharmaceutical and asbestos cases. Anne grew-up in Cincinnati and had been a reporter for the Cincinnati Post before deciding to practice law. She received her A.B. from Smith in 1976 and an M.S.L. from Yale Law School in 1982, where she studied for a year as a Ford Foundation fellow while on leave from the Post.

Read More
730 Words | 3 Pages

The People V. Ayala (2007) 155 Cal. App. 4th 604 [66 Cal. Rptr 3d 228] The Facts

Read More
946 Words | 4 Pages

Have you ever been in a courtroom and thought about how the court decide if the verdict of the accused party is guilty or not? How can you recognize if there was sufficient evidence to determine if the verdict was just or unjust? How would know if a trial was fair? There are many trials in history to look at. One of Chicago most controversial murder trial, I would have to say, is the trial of Leopold and Loeb in determining if their trial was just or unjust.

Read More
187 Words | 1 Pages

: This case is basically about the civil rights Movement which took place in Mid 20th Century. The New York times had published a Ad to defend Martin Luther King Jr. The Ad focused on how king had been harassed and treated badly by the Alabama Police. The charges were pretty Harsh and depressing for the police.

Read More
1692 Words | 7 Pages

Wisconsin Law Review, 2, 914–960 Posts about Amy Homan McGee on The Penn Stater Magazine. (n.d.). Retrieved April 29, 2017, from

Read More

More about Jewelry Wholesale V. Jennifer Lawson For Breach Of Contract

Related Topics

Open Document