ipl-logo

John Burke Case Studies

796 Words4 Pages

Introduction
For my paper, I chose case study number one that follows Mr. John Burke who committed the crime of first-degree murder. I will explain the process John Burke’s crime and what process he will be going through while in the American criminal justice system. This process includes a number of steps starting with Mr. Burke’s initial arrest and later ending with Mr. Burke’s subsequent release from prison and entry back into society on his own unsupervised. I will also touch on what I feel are the strongest and weakest parts of our criminal justice system, and I will give supporting evidence to my claims.
Brief Description of the Crime
John Burke’s crime falls under the first-degree murder statute because he killed Joseph Ronan, essentially; …show more content…

During this time, Mr. Burke is read his rights and is then taken to jail where he begins the booking process. “In criminal law, booking refers to the process by which the police department registers and enters charges against a person believed to have violated the law” ("Booking Law & Legal Definition"). Typically, the day after Mr. John Burke is booked he would have his first appearance/initial hearing. This step is where the defendant John Burke “learns more about his rights and the charges against him, arrangements are made for him to have an attorney, and the judge decides if the defendant will be held in prison or released until the trial” ("Initial Hearing / Arraignment"). Due to the severity of the crime John Burke is charged with, the judge decides to deny John Burke bail, and have him detained in the local jail. Now for the sake of this study, I’m going to say that no plea-bargaining was done and that John Burke entered a plea of not guilty in the murder of Joseph Ronan and waived his right to a preliminary hearing. In a preliminary hearing, “The prosecutor must show that enough evidence exists to charge the defendant” ("Preliminary Hearing"). Since Mr. Burke waived his right to a preliminary hearing the following step in the process would be going to …show more content…

The jury then deliberates and announces the verdict of guilty for John Burke’s on the count of first-degree murder. Once the verdict has been announced the trial then moves into the sentencing phase. Since, there is no death penalty in the state of Massachusetts the judge sentences John Burke to the maximum sentence life without the possibility of parole, which means Mr. Burke will not be getting out of prison. Mr. Burke will now live the rest of his years in a maximum security prison in the state of Massachusetts carrying out his sentence. Had Mr. Burke committed his crime in a different state or committed the lesser offense of second-degree murder he could have received an alternative sentence such as the Death Penalty, or life with the possibility of parole after a certain amount of years. The reason I picked this sentence for John Burke is because of the severity of his crime. Under the title, 18 U.S. Code § 3559 - Sentencing classification of offenses; John Burke committed a class a felony which holds the punishment of life in prison without the possibility of parole, or the death penalty ("18 U.S. Code § 3559 - Sentencing classification of

Show More
Related
616 Words | 3 Pages

In this case, the cases R v Dean, R v Baker and R v Villa, were cited and used as a precedent stating that “where multiple murders are committed by the one offender, the offender’s culpability for each murder is informed by his culpability for all the murders”. Due to the similar situations in which multiple murders occurred in those cases, it was used as a referral for the sentence given. STATUTE Section 19A (1) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) states that life imprisonment is utmost punishment for murder. This was a main factor that contributed to his sentence – life imprisonment. The other reason for this was Section 61(1) of the Crimes (Sentencing) Procedure Act 1999 (NSW) (“the Sentencing Act”).

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

The death sentence was simple and utterly based off of the crimes he committed and not his

Read More
789 Words | 4 Pages

This is where the defendant enters a plea (guilty, not guilty or no contest) (Schmalleger, 2015). In this case the defendant plead not guilty until his sentence was carried out and he was electrocuted. It is stated in our text book that, adjudication, or trial by jury, is where it states in the U.S Constitution in the 6th amendment where every criminal offender has the right to a trial by a jury (Schmalleger, 2015). In this case the defendant had a jury trial that lasted five weeks and they found him guilty of the murder of Charles Jr. According to our digital text book, sentencing happens once an offender had been convicted of a crime, the authority of a judge to enforce punishment on the offender happens at this time and a sentence may take many forms upon a judge’s decision (Schmalleger, 2015).

Read More
554 Words | 3 Pages

In prison Beck applied for parole three times, all being unsuccessful, and had her non-parole period extended by 18 months for assisting in the disposal of the body of another victim. During Becks time during prison she was targeted frequently, leading to many injuries forcing Beck to move to a safer environment. During the decision made on Valmae Beck the retributive theory of punishment was most taken into consideration. The retributive theory seeks to punish offenders because they deserve to be punished. The Jury of Becks case came to a decision of Valmae Beck being ‘unrecoverable’ where Beck needs to deserve the punishment of life for all her

Read More
757 Words | 4 Pages

In 1994 there was a man who went on trial for murder, his name was O.J. Simpson. He was on trial for the death of his ex-wife and a friend of hers. The two were found stabbed to death, O.J. was then put on trial for two accounts of first degree murder. He was found innocent of a technicality. This relates to the story “The Bargain” where a man commits murder but is never put on trial and therefore he never was able to account for his crime.

Read More
877 Words | 4 Pages

Furman was then sentenced to death under the felony murder law. The felony murder law is a legal doctrine that classifies murder into two groupings. The first is when somebody is in the act of committing a felony and regardless of accidental

Read More
697 Words | 3 Pages

He was sentenced by the court to capital punishment, the legal process that allows state governments to execute prisoners who committed a serious crime. At the trial, the judge found guilty of the two murders and two counts of armed robbery. Gregg challenged the court’s decision because it violated his 8th and 14th amendments and was “cruel and unusual punishment”. On January 17, 1971, Furman was sentenced to the death penalty because of an accidental murder. Furman broke-in to a house while robbing the house, the owner woke up and Furman started to run out of the house when all of a sudden his weapon dropped and discharged and killed the homeowner.

Read More
222 Words | 1 Pages

The man is then sent through the system and tried for murder because of the way the Crime Control Model is structured. He killed a man and now has to pay the consequences. Using the same

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

A bifurcated trial system was set up which consists of two phases, for bifurcated means divided. It is decided separately if the person on trial is guilty and what the penalty placed on the individual is (Vile). Each phase is subject can be to appeal too. In the first phase or the guilt phase, both sides submit evidence and argue whether or not the individual is guilty or not. In Gregg’s case, he had signed a waiver admitting to the killings and it was evident that he was guilty(“Gregg v. Georgia (1976)”).

Read More
301 Words | 2 Pages

correctly, the accused will always be held responsible for any injury caused by an unknown condition, or in this case, belief. Robert Blaue was to be sentenced for counts one and two against him, which would be manslaughter on the ground of diminished responsibility (Court) and wounding with the intent to do grievous bodily harm (ROBERT). He was also sentenced separately for the third, fourth, and fifth counts he had also accumulated. These counts included one count of indecent assault against Regina, and two additional counts of indecent assault from two other unrelated accounts (ROBERT). On July 9th, 1975, Robert Konrad Blaue was officially convicted and sentenced (ROBERT).

Read More
794 Words | 4 Pages

Mary Maloney, a responsible and loving housewife, had just heard that her husband wants to leave her. Upon hearing this news, she goes to the kitchen to cook him dinner even though Patrick, her husband, says not to. Mary grabs a lamb’s leg to cook, but instead of preparing it she decides to use it as a club against Patrick’s head. This blow to the head kills Mary’s would-be ex-husband, leaving her with an entirely new problem. Law enforcement must decide what degree this specific murder is.

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

Georgie Milton did something not many people have the guts to do, he took the life of his best friend to save him from the torture that awaited him, but, he took the life of another man and he took this life with the intention of murder. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, there is no difference between euthanasia and murder; and to this indictment, George Milton has pleaded not guilty. If I am to prove him otherwise, you must find him so. Lennie Small has been described to us as a caring giant. He had no bad intentions; and it is fair to say that our witnesses have provided us with sufficient evidence to support my argument.

Read More
1046 Words | 5 Pages

Life imprisonment with no parole will stop Knight from being a further menace to society by eliminating her chance of re-offending. Anything less than this sentence would be seen as an injustice not only to John Price, but to the community as a whole due to the severity of the

Read More
851 Words | 4 Pages

The judge declares the “Murder in the first degree—premeditated homicide—is the most serious charge tried in our criminal courts. One man is dead. The life of another is at stake. If there is a reasonable doubt in your minds as to the guilt of the accused … then you must declare him not guilty. If, however, there is no reasonable doubt, then he must be found guilty.

Read More
1567 Words | 7 Pages

For the Application of the Criminal Justice System project of the Criminal Justice course, I chose the arrest of John Burke. This case is about the arrest and sentencing of John Burke who had shot and killed Joseph Ronan. Twenty-five year old John Burke agreed to meet with 22 year old Joseph Ronan at Ronans home, in Reading, Massachusetts on Monday, August 15, 2011 around 1pm, with the intent of purchasing Percocet pills. (Boston.com, 2013) However, shortly after entering Ronans home, Burke opened fire (News, 2011), and after shooting Joseph Ronan several times, with the belief that Ronan was involved in a robbery at Burkes apartment in April 2011 (Boston.com, 2013), fled the home.

Read More

More about John Burke Case Studies

Related Topics

Open Document