Born May 29, 1736 in Studley Hanover County Virginia to John and Sara Winston Henry, Patrick Henry was a happy child and worked very hard even though sometimes the crops grew very little. Patrick Henry married at age eighteen to Sara Shelton the year of 1754, who he later had six kids with. For a wedding gift, Sara’s father gave them six slaves and three hundred acres to start Red Hill plantation in Virginia. A little while later Patrick had to sell the land because the soil was not fertile because of a fire, which caused the crops not to grow. He tried to start a business several times but each time he tried he was unsuccessful, so he decided to start studying law.
The Reb and Pastor Henry both were strongly committed to their religious doctrines and spent a great deal of their lives contributing to the well beings of others. Their stories began fairly similar, young men that strived for greatness, but came in contact with abounding obstacles in life . Pastor Henry grew up in an unstable home environment. The importance of school and God wasn’t reinforced constantly, but the use of drugs instantaneously became a way of life. During his adolescence, he developed a strong love for God and took him as his savior at the age of twelve, but then took a path in his teenage years that led him to drugs and violence.
Patrick Henry was born in Hanover County, Virginia on May 29, 1736 (Biography.com). His father was a Scotland immigrant, and his mother from the line a Virginia gentry ( Biography.com). His father served in the colony as a Justice of The Peace (“Henry, Patrick”). At age 15, he ran a store for his father to fail to succeed (“Henry,Patrick”). As a child, he loved long walks in the forest by himself and he was a child in love with music, he learned to play the fiddle and the flute.
Patrick Henry was a young teen that lived in the dominion of Virginia when he heard Samuel Davies speak. Samuel Davies advocated the New Light, which was derived during the First Great Awakening. Patrick Henry also heard Samuel Davies speak again when he was in his late teens. What he took away from that was religious freedom, which he then later applied to politics. Those led him to more democratic thoughts, such as the idea that the people should only have to follow laws they helped to create.
Henry’s display of courage in chapter 17 is in my opinion seen as reckless. Running towards a furry like object seen as courage? The definition according to dictionary.com is- the quality of mind or spirit that enables a person to face difficulty, danger, pain, etc., without fear; bravery. But courage has many different means to many different people. Courage in my opinion is standing up for what you believe in and complete the task.
Without a setting, characters would just be conversing because there would be no backdrop or external connection. The setting establishes the time and the mood for a scene. It establishes the tone and the actions of the characters. The descriptive details that come along with a setting allows a reader to visualize the scene. Additionally, it establishes the appropriateness of the actions that the characters can perform.
In comparing and contrasting there are many different ways to dive deeper to why text is different from a movie. If we look at the imagery, plot and the some of the characters there is similar and differences in both film and movie. In both versions of “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell and the film the most Dangerous game, Hunting and many other factors played a major role for the antagonist against the protagonist and both showed many ways of suspense and adventure that is behind each corner in one of many literature pieces written by of Richard Connell. When zoning into both The Most Dangerous Game text and The Most Dangerous Game film the details and imagery that forms the story and film are different.
The movie version of “The Ransom of Red Chief,” is better than the short story by O. Henry because more characters are introduced, the story has a humorous and lighthearted tone, and there is more conflict. The changes and additions needed to make improvements to the story include having more action, using more characters, and showing Red Chief with more emotion. The first reason the movie is favorable is how it introduces more characters. In the short story, the only starring characters are Red Chief, Mr. Dorset, Sam and Bill.
Both versions of the short story have their similarities and differences, while using suspense devices to make each version thrilling and exciting. However, the overall superior version was the film clip because of the visual representation
John recognized his flaws and tried very hard to correct them and overcome them. Unfortunately fell victim to the consequences of his errors but he preserved his name in the process. His character’s actions captured sympathy from the audience. John had all the qualities that would make him a tragic hero. He was a good person with human flaws that caused undeserved
Essay for QA/ “A Christmas Carol” Personally, I like the filmed version of “A Christmas Carol” better than the written version. I think that it has a synthetic feeling, and you really know what is happening. Just some of the details in the movie are spot on. It shows emotion, feeling, action, horror.
A film contrasts differently from the written version because in the movie you see what’s going on and you feel like you’re inside the movie. Also, in a story, you have to imagine what’s going on. In a story it’s kind’ve harder to imagine what’s happening. A christmas Carol is an amazing book and movie. Scrooge turns out to be a good guy in the end and Tiny Tim gets to live.
This shows how Ross will hold his loyalty to whomever is of power. To conclude, there are many similarities and differences in any film adaptation of a beloved novel or play. However, it is up to the audience to decide which version they enjoyed
Some people feel that it`s quite challenging locating differences between a written story and its film, though, however, some people find it considerably simple to detect differences between the pair. A Midsummer Nights Dream was undoubtedly great cinematic film made in 1999. However, the written play of A Midsummer Nights Dream was much more detailed and more informational. The differences I noticed were the following: The Indian boy and his role, the setting, characters and examples of similarities. First of all, the primary anomaly I noticed implies the Indian boy and his role during the piece.
