MILLERSBURG — A Wooster man on Wednesday was given a chance to avoid prison when he was sentenced to complete a treatment program for admittedly being in possession of methamphetamine. Shaun Hall, 38, 540 High St., previously pleaded guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to aggravated possession of meth. In exchange for his guilty plea, a related charge of aggravated trafficking in meth was dismissed. Hall had faced up to a year in prison for the charge, and Judge Robert Rinfret imposed a term of 11 months, but immediately suspended the period of incarceration in favor of five years of community control, which includes the condition he complete a treatment program at the Stark Regional Community Corrections Center.
In 1967 two men robbed a bank in Eustace, Texas. One man, with two pieces of tape on his face, went into the bank, pointed a gun at the cashier and demanded the money. His partner waited outside in a stolen getaway car. Wade and his partner were indicted for the robbery and counsel was appointed. About two weeks later, a FBI agent caused the two men to be part of a lineup consisting of five or six other men at which the bank employees were asked to make an identification, and at which the two men were in fact identified.
MILLERSBURG — Despite a plea for leniency expressed by the victim, a Sugarcreek man was unable to overcome a long history of criminal convictions and a bond violation when a Holmes County judge on Wednesday sentenced him to prison for making unwanted phone calls and threats to several members of a family over a period of months. David Lamar Schrock, 43, of 2578 State Route 39, previously pleaded guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to two counts of telephone harassment and one count of menacing by stalking. In exchange for his guilty plea, the state agreed to dismiss two additional counts of telephone harassment and three counts of menacing by stalking. The charges are made more serious because Schrock was convicted, in January 2016,
One of the most famous examples of a sentencing circle in use was the tragic case involving the death of two little girls in 2008. Christopher Pauchay, the father, was intoxicated when he took his two little girls out into the freezing cold barely dressed, and as result both froze to death in the harsh Saskatchewan climate. This case drew a lot of attention towards the community’s growing issues with alcohol abuse. The community, YellowQuill First Nation reserve, requested a sentencing circle be held to deal with these issues in a traditional Aboriginal fashion bringing the victim (in this case the mother), the community (which included elders and others), and the offender together. This request was highly controversial, considering the nature
Abstract The purpose of this research paper is to choose which of these models of justice: retributive, utilitarian, restorative or parallel, is appropriate for the Jonathan Nathaniel Ramsey case. We need justice to be delivered efficiently, effectively in order to make sure the offenders are held accountable and the victims receive assistance. Each crime that is committed needs to be addressed properly. When the crimes are not then that leads to the unrest in the community and to the victims.
This essay, will go over the selection process of both the Florida and New York judicial selection process, it will also compare and contrast their selection procedures will be scrutinized plus and include personal views on the best selection procedure between the two. The law consists of the trial court and appellate court which are the two main functional categories; the
The first point that was issued in the dissent is that Justice Scalia and Justice Thomas, believe that Mr. Martin is not a customer of the tour. That Title III only covers customers; the court ruled that Mr. Martin was a customer and those golf courses whether public or private must make reasonable accommodations. Justice Scalia compares a pro baseball player stating that they participate and play at fields but are certainly not considered customers of the league (PGA Tour, Inc v. Martin, 2001). Title III does not require "... 'modifications [that] would fundamentally alter the nature ' of the goods, services, and privileges."
munity; if she could be a witch, then anyone could. Magistrates even questioned Sarah Good's 4-year-old daughter, Dorothy, and her timid answers were construed as a confession. The questioning got more serious in April when Deputy Governor Thomas Danforth and his assistants attended the hearings. Dozens of people from Salem and other Massachusetts villages were brought in for questioning.
Specialized courts are specific in what roles they play in the criminal justice system. These courts are handling domestic violence cases and drug court cases. The goals for these types of courts have multiple reasons like to reduce the number of people entering jails and prison.
One of the non-traditional jobs in westmoreland county is portrayed by Michele Wentzel a female juvenile probation. I was lucky enough to get the chance to interview her. One of the questions she was asked was, Have you ever been hurt or threatened on the job? Michele answered that she was never physically hurt, but threatened many times by students and parents. Another topic discussed was, what is one of the most interesting probation cases you worked?
This essay will examine three types of disparities that happen under the United States sentencing today. Judges tend to look at the characteristics of the victim involved in the crime to determine the outcome of the sentence. Why should someone’s race, gender, or even religion effect the time they receive for their jail sentence? The 1984 Sentencing Reform Act (SRA) was created to eliminate disparities, basically explaining how one’s ethnicity, gender, and religion should not affect their sentencing. Even with this act existing, race and gender has still plays a huge part on unnecessary sentencing lengths.
Based on the seriousness of the offense and prior convictions, offenders are placed into one of the five categories listed in the guidelines (no/minor record, moderate record, serious record, violent or repetitive record, or serious violent record). To place a defendant into a criminal history group: the defendant's prior convictions must be grouped by arraignment date into criminal incidents, using the master crime list, "assign an offense seriousness level to each criminal incident based on the most serious offense of conviction", record the number of criminal incidents at the offense seriousness level, and finally assign the defendant the most appropriate criminal history category. Similar to the seriousness of the offense, the judge must also take into consideration different factors. The first factor is the defendant's prior convictions/staircasing. The second factor is to take into account multiple incidents.
The Supreme Court recently began hearing oral arguments in a case, where two men were convicted of bribery by a jury. However, that conviction was overturned by an appeal because the jury had been improperly instructed as to what constitutes a guilty verdict. The attorney for the defense, Lisa Blatt said, “The government should bear the consequences when overlapping charges produce split verdicts of acquittals and invalid convictions.” This quote identifies with one of the fundamental principles of the American legal system, the presumption of innocence until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt. While Blatt continues to argue that the vacated conviction is worthless.
In America social status also played a big role when Joseph McCarthy, the Senator from Wisconsin, was formally censured, but still remained in the office. Even though he ruined many government officials’ life by making false accusations, he didn’t receive any type of punishment (How McCarthyism Worked). Other than social status, race also influenced the court decisions. African Americans, didn’t receive justice against whites even if there was more than enough evidence to prove the crime. For example, Emmett Till was a fourteen
Judicial selection is an intriguing topic as there are multiple ways that judges take their seat on the bench. The United States Constitution spells out how federal judges are selected and leaves it up to the individual states to establish their means for selecting judges. In federal courts, judges are appointed and it varies between appointment and election for state courts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences between appointments and elections (as well as the multiple types of elections) and to give an opinion as to which is the better alternative. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States and are confirmed on the advice and consent of the United States Senate.
