ipl-logo

Julius Caesar Essay: Brutus Vs. Antony

1232 Words5 Pages

Julius Caesar: Brutus Vs. Antony While the death of a single man may seem upsetting at most, it is actually the sole cause for the fall of Rome. The future of Rome was in the hands of the presenters who provided the funeral speeches from the second that Julius Caesar perished. In his play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, William Shakespeare reflects on current powerful events within his time period through the relationships between Julius Caesar, and his two right-hand men: Marcus Brutus and Mark Antony. After Caesar was viciously betrayed by Brutus’s decision to assassinate Caesar, from the influence of a jealous Cassius, Brutus attempts to justify his wrongful actions while Antony successfully rebuttals Brutus’s claims. By highlighting Caesar’s …show more content…

To begin, Antony purposely utilizes specific diction which contributes to his legitimacy when he states, “Come I to speak in Caesar’s funeral. / He was my friend, faithful and just to me…” (Shakespeare 3.2.86-86). Antony's authority can be proven by illustrating his close association and connection with Caesar. Antony offers himself as a reliable source of understanding and insights into Caesar's personality by portraying himself in a way that convinces the audience that the two were close, which therefore establishes credibility among the audience. Furthermore, by underlining Caesar's traits as a loyal friend, Antony implies that the assassin’s acts, including Brutus's, were cruel. Following this deduction, Antony constructs a defense against the murderers of Caesar with the objective of altering the audience's view and inducing empathy for Caesar's tragic end. Next, not only was Antony a close friend of Caesar, but he is an honest man who doesn’t have ulterior motives. Antony further proves his credibility when stating, “I should do Brutus wrong and Cassius wrong… / I will not do them wrong; I rather choose / to wrong the dead…” (Shakespeare 3.2.126-128). Antony’s refusal to speak poorly of Brutus reveals that Antony’s sole desire in giving his funeral speech is to remind the audience of Caesar’s good qualities and attributes, which ultimately convinces them that his death was undeserved. Additionally, Antony develops his credibility through his practice of the Roman virtue, pietas, when he rejects the idea of disrespecting a fellow Roman. Brutus’s approach in convincing the audience of Caesar’s unfair death is seen purely as a way to seek justice for his late best friend. Antony is able to heighten his credibility by intentionally expressing his close friendship with Caesar and exposing his morals within the

Show More
Related
431 Words | 2 Pages

When he ascends the pulpit to speak at Caesar’s funeral, Antony repeatedly says that Brutus is an “honorable man”, (Act III, Scene II) but continues to disprove his own claim with multiple pieces of evidence. By disproving his claim while seeming compassionate, Antony makes his audience believe that he is caring yet naive. This allows the audience to let their guard down and think that their later ideas are their own. Antony uses the crowds’ emotions to convince them that Brutus and the Conspirators aren’t honorable. Antony says that he won’t do the Conspirators wrong by stirring up a mutiny.

Read More
549 Words | 3 Pages

Anthony's many times throughout his speech mocks brutus to show the audience how they shouldn’t trust brutus. “and brutus is an honorable man” (III.ii.83-85), antony using pathos to show facts on why not to trust cesar. Throughout the speech antony uses literary devices to appeal to the audience and to show the connection in the speech so that the romans will find the antony's one more persuavies since he is appealing to

Read More
598 Words | 3 Pages

Romans knew Caesar as an ambitious and honorable man, but Brutus is said to be as well. Which one might have assumed from Antony’s speech, was a plea for righteousness for the death of Julius Caesar. Antony states that he has come to bury Caesar but as the speech goes forward we come to realize he has come to bury the conspirators for their wrongdoings. Using ethos, pathos, and logos throughout his speech to shine the light on the truth of this tragedy. Using ethos by stating “Come I to speak in Caesar’s funeral.

Read More
691 Words | 3 Pages

At his funeral, Antony gives a speech in which addresses the mob siding with Brutus that is celebrating his death. In his speech, Antony uses a variety of appeals in order to convince the mob that Brutus should be held accountable for the death of Caesar. Antony’s

Read More
671 Words | 3 Pages

In Antony’s speech to the people, he speaks about Caesar over his dead body. His words make the commoners feel something, as opposed to Brutus,

Read More
422 Words | 2 Pages

Antony's use of rhetorical devices effectively manipulates the emotions of the crowd, who go from mourning Caesar to seeking revenge against the conspirators. Antony's emotional appeal

Read More
774 Words | 4 Pages

Antony’s speech was more effective in persuading the Romans against Brutus because he uses pathos and ethos to reach his goal of stirring up the plebeians and bringing Rome into chaos. Throughout the speech, Antony uses pathos to make the plebeians feel guilt, sympathy, and anger for Caesar's death and Antony’s relations with Caesar. In Antony’s speech he said to the plebeians “He was my friend, faithful and just to me” (III;ii;84) when speaking about how great Caesar was. This

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

He presents evidence to support his arguments, such as the will that Caesar left behind in which he bequeaths his wealth to the Roman people. Antony uses this evidence to demonstrate that Caesar was not the tyrant that his assassins claimed him to be, but rather a benevolent leader who cared for the welfare of the Roman people. Finally, Antony uses rhetorical devices such as irony and sarcasm to undermine the credibility of Caesar's assassins. For example, he points out that Caesar's wounds were inflicted by the very people who claimed to be his friends and that they did so for "the general good."

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

Both Brutus and Antony must convince the people that Caesar's death was not their fault to ensure that the anger of Caesar's death doesn’t turn to them. Brutus, a friend of Caesar, attempts to convince the people that Caesar's death was merely for their good. Meanwhile, Antony attempts to avenge Caesar's death by spotlighting his nobleness and kindness to the people of Rome. The ideas of rhetoric eventually led to the death of a ruler. Antony made the

Read More
395 Words | 2 Pages

Antony talks the truth about Caesar, when remembering the good he has done and says “He hath brought many captives home to Rome whose ransoms did the general coffers fill” (II16). Antony after asked what seemed ambitious about Caesar when he refused the crown. “You all did see that on the Lupercal I thrice presented him a kingly crown which he did refuse” (II25).Caesar didn't seem ambitious he seemed much more like a reliable king the Romans saw him as. Antony seemed much more closer to Caesar.

Read More
202 Words | 1 Pages

In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, a horrendous crime took place, in Act three Scene 1. Julius Caesar was killed by the conspirators. After his murder Antony, fearing for his life sympathized with the conspirators, but he became determined to prove they were criminals. The great and “honourable” Brutus and Cassius, talk to the crowd of plebeians, to announce the death of Caesar and to justify the terrible crime. Antony gave Caesar 's funeral speech, was not involved in the murder, but he declared loyalty to the murderers, but he still remained loyal to Caesar.

Read More
737 Words | 3 Pages

In Brutus’ oration he answers the question of why he decided to kill Caesar. Brutus answers the question by saying, “this is my answer: not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more” (3.2.22-24). This answer from Brutus appeals to the Romans’ sense of nationalism. Brutus inflames the mob’s feeling of passion and pride for their country. This use of pathos is very powerful and well crafted; however, Mark Antony outsmarts him.

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the reader learns that two men, Brutus and Cassius, are concerned that Julius Caesar, the future dictator of Rome, has harnessed too much power. And as part of their scheme against him, they both intend to have him killed. But they have very different motivations from one another. This essay will compare and contrast the motives of Brutus and Cassius in the conspiracy against Caesar. Focusing on Brutus, in Act 2, Scene 1, while he is alone in his orchard, Brutus's reasoning for killing Caesar is revealed.

Read More
632 Words | 3 Pages

By asking questions such as, "Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?" (Act III, Scene II), Antony highlights the contradictions and hypocrisies present in the statements made by Brutus and his co-conspirators. Moreover, Antony's repeated emphasis on Caesar's virtues and his loyalty to Rome serve to further engender the crowd's affection towards him. In doing so, Antony is able to gain the support of the masses, ultimately leading to a chaotic and violent uprising against the conspirators. His skillful employment of rhetorical questions and his masterful use of language play a crucial role in swaying the opinions of the Roman

Read More
864 Words | 4 Pages

For true friendship, loyalty is required. In Julius Caesar, Marc Antony shows how his true friendship and loyalty to Caesar, especially after Caesar’s death. With his manipulative and caring nature, Antony avenges Caesar’s death and defeats the conspirators at the end of the play. In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the character Marc Antony is a true friend to Caesar and is loyal when he pursues to avenge Caesar’s death, showing his loyalty to Caesar. He does this through his manipulative speeches and his caring soliloquies that inspire him to defeat the conspirators.

Read More

More about Julius Caesar Essay: Brutus Vs. Antony

Open Document