ipl-logo

Julius Caesar Ethos

360 Words2 Pages

Brutus & Antony’s funeral speeches dissected. In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Brutus’s speech was less effective because he kept repeating the same thing, Caesar was ambitious, and he tried to use logos to persuade them. Whereas Antony’s speech was effective because he got into the commoners' emotions and riled them up. Antony also used logos, ethos, and pathos more than Brutus did. Brutus’s speech focused on the fact that Caesar was ambitious enough that he had to be killed before he could do anything bad to Rome. He tried to get the people to put aside their emotions and think about what is best for Rome. He also challenged the crowds, telling them “Who is here so vile that will not love his country?”(Line 32-33) (“Julius Caesar Act 3, Scene 1 Translation | …show more content…

The fourth plebeian said “Did you listen to Antony’s words? Caesar wouldn’t take the crown. Therefore, it’s certain that he wasn’t ambitious”. So Antony got his point across in the first portion of his speech. Antony’s second portion of his speech was mainly using pathos. He appeals to the crowds emotions by telling them about his will and not telling them about the will until later in the story. He also kept the crowd telling sarcastically how the conspirators are “honarable men” and he would rather wrong himself and the dead than the men. In the end, after Brutus and Antony have both told their speech, Antony wins over the crowd by using his rhetorical appeals to persuade the crowd. Antony won over all too because he got the crowd riled up to kill Brutus and the conspirators. Works Cited “Brutus Vs Antony Rhetorical Analysis | ipl.org.” IPL.org, https://www.ipl.org/essay/Brutus-Vs-Antony-Rhetorical-Analysis-PCZYJK9J8AM. Accessed 21 May 2024. “Julius Caesar Act 3, Scene 1 Translation | Shakescleare, by LitCharts.” LitCharts,

Show More
Related

Antony And Brutus Use Of Rhetorical Devices Used In Julius Caesar

957 Words | 4 Pages

In Julius Caesar, both Antony and Brutus delivered languishing speeches using rhetorical devices to attract the audience and persuade the crowd that their opinions were correct and logical. Marcus Brutus used more of a scare tactic and threatened the people of Rome to challenge him. Mark Antony used more of a sentimental and emotional technique to appeal to the vulnerable audience. He speaks to the crowd, rather than above it as Brutus does in his lofty speech of honor. Mark Antony presented the more rhetorically effective speech using the vulnerability of the Roman citizen’s feelings and the techniques of pathos, plain folk, bandwagon and reverse psychology.

Read More

Antony's Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In Julius Caesar

949 Words | 4 Pages

Antony’s Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, after Caesar’s death, the Romans are conflicted about what should be done. After Brutus’ speech the Romans are ready to crown Brutus king and be on the conspirators’ side. Though Brutus then leaves the crowd while Antony delivers his speech, the crowd realizes what should be done of Caesar’s murder and Antony prevents the conspirators from getting away with the murder of Caesar.

Read More

Brutus Use Of Ethos In Julius Caesar

394 Words | 2 Pages

In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare , Brutus and Antony both have different ways of getting the people’s attention through their speeches. Brutus and Antony appeal to ethos, logos, and pathos. Both use them differently to manipulate the people. Brutus uses them to confuse the people to justify the killing of Caesar. Antony uses them to take advantage of the plebeians and turn them against Brutus.

Read More

Julius Caesar Ethos Pathos Logos

598 Words | 3 Pages

Romans knew Caesar as an ambitious and honorable man, but Brutus is said to be as well. Which one might have assumed from Antony’s speech, was a plea for righteousness for the death of Julius Caesar. Antony states that he has come to bury Caesar but as the speech goes forward we come to realize he has come to bury the conspirators for their wrongdoings. Using ethos, pathos, and logos throughout his speech to shine the light on the truth of this tragedy. Using ethos by stating “Come I to speak in Caesar’s funeral.

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

385 Words | 2 Pages

Act III, Scene 2 of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Antony's speech effectively develops and supports the central idea of turning the people against Brutus and honoring Caesar, through his use of emotional appeal, rhetorical questions, and loaded words. Brutus manipulated the people but Antony uses good reasoning to turn the people against Brutus. Antony masterfully employs emotional appeal to evoke strong feelings in the audience and encourage them to turn against Brutus. “For when the noble Caesar saw him stab, ingratitude, more strong than traitor’s arms, quite vanqished him.” Therefore the noble Caesar so who stab him and brutus was his friend and did him wrong. ”

Read More

Marc Antony's Ethos In Julius Caesar

816 Words | 4 Pages

In the famous play of Julius Caesar, ethos-, logos-, and pathos-based persuasive techniques are used in the funeral speeches, coming first from Brutus and then Marc Antony, to influence the people of Rome to view Caesar's death as either an asset or a downfall. Brutus, closest friend and murderer of Caesar, takes a stand in front of the crowd of Romans, intending to enlighten his positive outlook upon the situation. In order to convince his audience, Brutus insists that Caesar was too ambitious, and that type of ambition would bring Rome to ruins

Read More

How Is Ethos Used In Julius Caesar

428 Words | 2 Pages

Both speeches also use persuasion to convince their audience of their point of view. While Brutus persuades his audience that killing Caesar was the right thing to do, Mark Antony persuades his audience that Caesar didn't deserve to die and that the killers are the real enemy. Both speeches also use repetition. Brutus uses repetition, speaking

Read More

Julius Caesar Pathos

916 Words | 4 Pages

He wanted to take care of the people. By saying all this he tries to point out why Brutus was wrong with saying the reason he killed Caesar was because he was ambitious. As Antony speaks, he continues to repeat the line that "Brutus was an honorable man." He does this so that the crowd will catch onto his sarcasm. Brutus only allowed Antony to come speak if he would only say good things about Brutus, so Antony decides to use repetition and sarcasm as well as a way to engage the

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

422 Words | 2 Pages

In William Shakespeare's "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar," two powerful speeches are given by Mark Antony and Marcus Brutus. Both speeches are delivered at Caesar's funeral, and each orator seeks to sway the Roman citizens to their side. Although both Mark Antony and Marcus Brutus deliver powerful speeches, Antony delivers the more effective speech because he appeals to the emotions of the people, provides evidence to support his claims, and undermines the credibility of the conspirators. Mark Antony appeals to the emotions of the people. Antony's use of rhetorical questions and repetition, such as "Brutus is an honorable man," is designed to challenge the credibility of Brutus and the other conspirators.

Read More

Ethos And Pathos In Julius Caesar

590 Words | 3 Pages

He uses pathos throughout his speech in order to influence the people to join his side because he is forbidden by Brutus to speak against the conspirators He is trying to appeal to their emotions and feelings in order to convince them to take his side and go against the conspirators. Antony states that "Caesar was my friend, faithful and just to me." in order to draw the crowd in and to evoke sympathy from them as he mourns the loss of his friend. He's trying to convey to the crowd that Caesar was also a man who had friends and was caring for those friends. This is to make Caesar appear more human.

Read More

How Does Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar

897 Words | 4 Pages

Have you ever wondered how Antony was able to persuade the people to seek revenge on the senate in Act III of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar? To summarize the part in the play, after Caesar dies, they hold a funeral for him where Brutus invites Antony to speak his thoughts on Caesar. However, this soon turned into a debate to win the crowd over. In the end, Antony’s speech was victorious. Antony was able to persuade the people that Caesar was a great leader through rhetorical devices such as ethos and pathos.

Read More

Examples Of Ethos In Julius Caesar

898 Words | 4 Pages

After Caesar was murdered people were happy but, all of them were turned against those who had murdered Caesar; this was all possible by the use of rhetoric. Antony’s hands were tied so, he used the only thing he had left, words. Antony was told that he was not allowed to praise Caesar and, that he was there to only talk and nothing else. Antony managed to get the crowd to notice that what Brutus and his conspirators had done was not justified. Antony was able to perfectly able get the crowd to realize that Caesar was a good man who did everything to help the people.

Read More

Brutus Rhetoric Analysis

872 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout the entirety of William Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, one can find many examples of rhetoric; however it is especially seen in the speeches given by the characters Brutus and Antony in Act III Scene II. Ethos, a rhetorical device that establishes credibility and principles, can be found at the beginning of the speech Brutus delivers to the plebians; Brutus states, “Be patient till the last. Romans, Countrymen, and lovers, hear me for my cause, and be silent, that you may hear. Believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine honor, that you may believe. Censure me in your wisdom, and awake your senses” (III.ii. 13-18).

Read More

Theme Of Ambition In Frankenstein

1557 Words | 7 Pages

Frankenstein by Mary Shelley tells the story of passionate scientist Victor Frankenstein, whose devotion to science leads him to become obsessed with creating life, but his genuine intentions lead to a lifelong conflict with his problematic creation. This creature causes pain and suffering for Victor by killing his friends and family, which causes him to feel responsible for their deaths. Ambition’s dark and addictive side got the best of Victor, who became blinded by his dreams of glory. Similarly, Don Quixote fails to identify the risks of ambition while exploring Spain. He wants to be a famous knight so badly that he begins to hallucinate obstacles that he must conquer.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony's Speech

884 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar

Read More

More about Julius Caesar Ethos

Open Document