Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gaius julius
Catch me if you can character analysis
Caesar augustus emperor
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gaius julius
Catch me if you can character analysis
Caesar augustus emperor
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Gaius Julius Caesar was a general, dictator of Rome, and a man of the people. His upbringing molded him into a great leader, who understood the needs of the people of Rome. During the height of his power, he worked to reform and better Rome. His life had a lasting effect on both Rome and the continent of Europe. Julius Caesar strived to do what was best for Rome and all its citizens, before thinking of himself.
Caesar brought Cassius into his inner despite their past, or as Caesar thought that cassius will be to
Cassius feels upset about Caesar's rise to power. Cassius feels upset because Caesar is no better than any other man and that Caesar is very weak. According to Caesar, Cassius is dangerous because he thinks too much, he reads too much, he is a great observer, he does
Was Julius Caesar a villain or a hero? Some people believe he was a villain and some people believe he was a hero. I believe he was a hero because he brought peace and order into Rome, strengthened and expanded Rome, and set up job programs for people and helped the farmers that were migrating. Overall he helped Rome a lot.
Who was Julius Caesar was he a hero or a villain? Julius Caesar was a hero to many plebeians because he made many great accomplishments of the government , Rome, and for the poor. Some people might think he was a villain, but some people think differently. First of all, Julius Caesar did many great effects to Rome. Julius gave land to the landless, like the poor and veterans who didn’t have land before.
The conversation between Cassius and Casca clearly shows Cassius having a leadership role. Cassius tells Casca about how he had formed a group of noblemen to go on a dangerous mission. The mission on how to stop Caesar from being the ruler of Rome. The fact that Cassius said there are noblemen waiting outside for him, shows how these men depends on Cassius to save them from Caesar. Also Cassius is the only nobleman to be brave enough to devise a plan on getting rid of Caesar.
As a Roman senator, I would capitalize on what Caesar has given in his commentary, taking it as an advantage into making the Roman Empire stronger. I know that Gaul is divided into 3 parts, and knowing the Helvetti, Belgae and Germans are constantley at war against eachother, i would use their weakness as power. I would send troops in right away to get control of the land. The civilains of the land would have an option, to either stay where they are and continue to practice their own ways, or if they did not cooperate, use force. The reason for capturing this land is so that Rome can gain more allies, and more land.
A totally tyrant of the kingdom. For these self-indulgent reasons Cassius is a villain. Trying to take something good and spin it into his own benefit. Brutus on the other hand was only half bought in, he didn't really want to take the life of a friend even if it is for the betterment of Rome. He finally agree with Cassius’s persuasion.
But the true villain of this tale isn’t man, it is man’s nature. Now, using Albert’s quote [above] as a frame of reference we can make the comparison that Cassius is the hero because he is acting on the evil he sees in the world around him. He is trying to make the world better, is he not? Even under his mistakenly zealous ways of doing so, isn’t it the thought that counts? If this is to be taken as fact, then reasonably Caesar is the villain of our story, is he not?
One of these power-hungry men is Cassius. Cassius is motivated by greed and a pressure, placed upon him by a society that values power
Let’s start with the positives first . Cassius can start a group quickly such as the group of conspirators. He also finished his goal of killing Caesar. Cassius was right about one thing for sure and that was not wanting to Philippi.
Cassius is often referred to as a villain in the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare. A villain is a play or stories antagonist. Traits of a villain include manipulative and untrustworthy. Cassius was a known companion of Caesar’s that was an active part in the assassination (Gaius). First of all, Cassius manipulates Brutus and the rest of the conspirators into helping him assassinate Caesar.
The true nature of Julius Caesar has always been a topic of great debate. The painting called Caesar Victorious and Shakespeare's representation of Caesar represent two different points of view when talking about Caesar. One image sees Caesar as pure and above all and the other sees Caesar as hungry for power and desperate for any social mobility. Shakespeare clearly portrays Caesar as hungry for power. When offered the crown to become the leader, Caesar refused it without hesitation.
Julius Caesar was a Powerful Roman politician and general, who served as a god to the Romans. He played a key role in the events that led to the downfall of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman empire. His reign from 49 B.C to 44 B.C illustrated his dominance in controlling a commanding army and ruling a nation. Many historians have different opinions on Caesar's command. Some saw him as a leader for the people, whereas others saw him as a man searching for power and power alone.
Julius Caesar was the Dictator of Rome in 42 BC who accomplished many things. Many people believed that he was a hero, but Julius Caesar was a very ambitious dictator and was more of a villain than a hero. Julius Caesar was a villain because he didn’t think first before doing something, he forced the Senate to name him dictator for life and he also was a glory hound and put his needs before the republic. To begin with, Julius Caesar was a was a glory hound and put his needs before the republic. Caesar used his power as dictator more towards his advantage instead of helping the people in Rome.