Juveniles Tried As Adults Essay

Trying and sentencing juveniles as adults is unjust treating a child as a adult when the recent science suggests that the adolescent brain is still developing along with their ability to reason– are still developing. Many juveniles in the U.S. are being tried as adults, but research finds that many can’t comprehend their situations well enough to support their defense. Justice Kagan mentioned Graham and J. D. B. v. North Carolina in which juveniles are less likely to accommodate their own trial and would likely result to extreme pressures during interrogation (Kagan 8). Despite the fact that the justice system knows well that most juvenile offenders are still developing making it impossible to genuinely comprehend the results of their actions,

For example, if a twelve-year-old kid is accused as an adult of an executing of another kid, at that point he will be condemned to serve his sentence in an adult jail. Recent research, “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains,” Paul Thompson, argues that a loss of brain tissues occurs during teenage years in which adolescents’ brains aren’t fully developed. The study reinforces the argument confirming that the adolescent brain isn’t fully developed, and the teenage brain is undergoing dramatic changes in ways that affect teen’s ability to weight the consequences for their decisions which would delay long enough to make teens unaware of their actions which would lead to serious consequences (Thompson 45). The following evidence suggests teens don’t see the barriers and limitations the way adults do. Bringing a fresh perspective to old problems and challenging limits is the essence of the teenage mind. In another research paper “In Miller,” Justice Kagan distinguished that adolescence is decided by their failure to appreciate the risks and consequences which makes it difficult for them to decipher what's right and what’s wrong. (Kagan