ipl-logo

Kant And Mills Theory On Brain Death

1213 Words5 Pages

Introduction
Does a person really die when their brain dies? The topic of brain death has been examined for decades and although it is widely used as a definitive measure to determine human death, it remains a controversial topic of conflicting opinion, in which a clear consensus has yet to be reached. This paper will reflect on both proponents for and against using brain death as a determining factor in human death and the supporting evidence that has been published on each opinion. I will then apply Kant and Mills theory to each side of this argument in the hopes to reach a better understanding of this topic.

Kant and Brain Death
The concept of brain death isn’t easy to understand. In 1968 the Harvard Medical School Ad Hoc Committee led …show more content…

From this study’s findings, an ethical issue arose and people began arguing that doctors were pushing for brain death diagnosis as a way to make much-needed organs more readily available. With the high demand for organs, Stein (2007) suggests that “Federal health officials, transplant surgeons and organ banks are promoting [brain death as synonymous with human death] as a way to meet the increasing demand for organs…” There are some doctors and bioethicists who are afraid that because of the high demand for organs, that medical practitioners will start to lose sight of what’s humane for the dying patient and instead focus on the best outcome for patients in need of organ transplants. (Stein, 2007) “It’s worrisome when you stop thinking of the person who is dying as a patient but rather as a set of organs, and start thinking more about what’s best for the patient in the next room waiting for the organs.” Gail A. Van Norman, an anesthesiologist and bioethicist at the University of Washington (as cited in Stein, 2007). Coming to an agreed upon consensus is important because if it is truly believed that taking an organ from a patient who is brain dead is taking an organ from an individual who is still technically living, then that may be considered intentional killing of that patient (Potts & Byrne, 2000). Immanuel Kant would agree that it would be going …show more content…

Or should moral duty be the decision maker? It’s hard to come to a decision about what is right and wrong with these two arguments. I do tend to agree more with Kant’s beliefs in general but in this certain circumstance I do believe that once a person has been determined as brain dead, then there is nothing more that can be done to help this person and that they are dead from that point on. The only reason why it can even be considered that they are alive is because of life support. But can a person be considered meaningfully alive if they have no organ for thought and machines are being used that force the body to stay alive? I have gone through a personal experience with brain death; I lost my father to it after he suffered a cardiac arrest. After days of waiting to see what would happen after the tests had been run and after the doctors told us the prognosis, it was clear to see that there was nothing more that could be done. The decision was made to take him of life support and within minutes after that he passed away. Drawing from that experience, I can tell you that a person who is brain dead is basically dead. Every situation is different though but from my experience that is the conclusion that I am coming

Show More
Related
1370 Words | 6 Pages

Sarah Shaut PHI 237 Paper Topic #7 11/6/2017 McMahan and the Upper Brain Criterion of Death Determining when someone dies has been an important issue in medicine. There are many contradicting views on the specific criteria for death. Some people believe that death has one concept in which it is an irreversible biological phenomenon.

Read More
1129 Words | 5 Pages

My closing book report for the class is an assessment of the Book entitled “Fundamentalism and American Culture” by George M Marsden. It is in this essay where my objective will be to classify and evaluate the strengths, weaknesses, and merits of the book. The first strength I observe with the book is the in dept clarification of what the fundamentalist movement exactly consisted of. The fundamentalist movement has managed to stand firm against the pressures of the scientific society and also the draw of contemporary trendy culture to clutch on to their ultra-conservation Christian outlook. This book has for long been considered a classic in religious olden times by many professors and scholars over the years.

Read More
455 Words | 2 Pages

There are many cases on people who are brain dead. For example, George Pickering was pronounced brain dead. The doctors wanted to take him off of life support but his father said that he was going to die with his son by killing himself with a gun. Before the father did anything else he told his son to squeeze his hand. George squozed his dad’s hand and then the father repeated himself once more.

Read More
937 Words | 4 Pages

The brain is a vital and complex organ. “It controls everything that is happening in the body, like breathing and heartbeats. Therefore, if the brain stops working, the individual is brain dead. This does not mean that the individual is in a coma. It means that the person is dead but the heart is still beating thanks to life support”, (“Brain death”).

Read More
669 Words | 3 Pages

If we need to limit anyone’s autonomy, do we have sufficient justification for doing so? Here, ask yourself whether Kant’s principle of humanity applies to the death

Read More
728 Words | 3 Pages

Due to a lack of knowledge on what brain death actually is, there have been issues that arise such as whether or not it should be used as a way to determine death. According to NHS, “Brain death (also known as brain stem death) is when a person on an artificial life support machine no longer has any brain functions.” Due to the lack of any brain activity, determined through a set of tests, it is understood that the person has experienced death due to the fact that without the life support being provided they would be dead according to the traditional definition of death. The traditional definition of death is when there is “irreversible cessation of circulatory and respiratory functions'' (Sarbey).

Read More
578 Words | 3 Pages

In “How to Know If You’re Dead,” author Mary Roach explores the definition of brain death and how declaring death when the heart is beating, but there is no brain activity, has been extremely controversial. The essay explains how modern medicine has created the problem of classifying death by developing technology to maintain life on a respirator despite there being no brain activity. Roach explains that, although there is a general public understanding of brain death, the fact that the heart may still be beating causes many to feel that the patient is still alive. In addition to providing background information and rationale about organ harvesting, the essay’s narration also allows me to visualize the process and to understand the controversy surrounding it.

Read More
1821 Words | 8 Pages

Once a person is pronounced dead by legal standards, regardless of the state in which said person remains, if proper consent was attained from all parties involved, organ removal should be permitted both legally and ethically. Technology is now leaps and bounds ahead of where it once was. It is believed that the earliest cases of organ transplantation were in medieval times and were

Read More
239 Words | 1 Pages

In “How to know if you’re dead” the author defines the topic of a brain-dead patient. How we really know if you are death? This question struggled people for century as well the author Mary Roach. “The legal community took a little longer than the physicians to come around to concept of brain death”. (12) Brain death is the complete and irreversible loss of brain function.

Read More
1822 Words | 8 Pages

According to World Journal of Transplantation, 2015, “transplantation ethics is the philosophy that incorporates systematizing, defending, and advocating concepts of right and wrong related to organ donation and allocation. ”1 Initially, the supervision of transplant activities and centers in Germany was based on a mutual trust and interdependence. That changed after several scandals shook the transplant community. In Germany, the Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation [(DSO)German Organ Transplantation Foundation] is responsible for the coordination of organ donation.2

Read More
886 Words | 4 Pages

In the recent decades, the gap between the demand for available organs and the supply has grown wider. It is becoming increasingly difficult for organ recipients to obtain their needed organ due to various issues concerning living and deceased organ donation. Throughout the paper the major topics discuss the legal and ethical issues that surround living and deceased organ transplantation, such as cultural interference, unneeded aggressive resuscitation, and the legal procedures of the deceased. The four trans-cultural principles of medical ethics are beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice (Consolo, Wigmore 341).

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

The end of life process is a scary one. There are situations where people who have a terminal illness are in hospice for months, in severe pain, and sadly awaiting death. There are some countries, states, and groups of people who believe that letting a person die a slow painful death is immoral. Due to these people’s point of view, euthanasia and physicians assisted suicide have become a topic of interest. However, because both of these are still ultimately suicide, Immanuel Kant would not have believed in it.

Read More
1340 Words | 6 Pages

As modern medicine has advanced and the use of life sustaining technology has become more mainstream, a greater number of families and doctors are being faced with an important decision; when to use artificial organs, and when to shut them off. It’s a decision that haunts people long after it is made (Park). The topic of whether or not life support should be used for long periods of time to sustain brain dead patients is heavily debated. Many believe that brain death, a condition in which one loses all brain function and brain stem reflexes, is the same as final death. Science also points in this direction, and many doctors agree that brain dead patients should be removed from life support because they are technically already dead (Rubin).

Read More
974 Words | 4 Pages

The patient in this situation has no self-awareness or any awareness of their surroundings due to the Cerebral Cortex the part of the brain in which your entire thinking takes place is dead, and inactive. The brain stem still works in these cases and is functional which is the part of the brain that controls the major organs of the body. Once Classified as a PVS the patient will never become conscious again remaining in this state of life until the patient dies off. They are not brain dead according to the United States because the term brain dead is used when the brain tissues break down, making vital organs, and the lungs stop working requiring the use of machines to keep the patient alive. The patients family may choose to have the doctor remove the use of life support, and if doctors agree that it is best for the patient, it will be done.

Read More
1072 Words | 5 Pages

There can be no right or wrong answering this. There is a policy known as the Dead donor rule that raises a lot of ethical questions. Medical professionals must weight the value of saving a life with the individual rights with their body. However, with this rule the person must be declared dead before a doctor can harvest the organs. My debates lie in when is dead dead.

Read More

More about Kant And Mills Theory On Brain Death

Related Topics

Open Document