ipl-logo

Kant: What Makes A Good King?

731 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Influence of enlightenment movement

The main point that Kant is trying to get across in this part of the reading that a good King allows freedom in the ways that people think and believe in different religions. Kant states “He [a good king] sees that there is no danger to his lawgiving in allowing his subjects to make public use of their reason and to publish their thoughts on a better formulation of his legislation” (6). Kant wants men to be able to speak freely and have the ability to criticize different views from their own instead of being fed what they are supposed to say and do. On pages four and five Kant says, “The touchstone of everything that can be concluded as a law for a people lies in the question whether the people could have imposed such a law on itself.” I believe …show more content…

Allowing people to think freely and come up with their own ideas was what the enlightenment was about. Kant says, “And what a people may not decree for itself can even less be decreed for them by a monarch, for his lawgiving authority rests on his uniting the general public will in his own” (5). What he is saying is that if people cannot think for themselves and make rules for themselves, then the king cannot make these rules for the, because his authority is based on bringing his people together through what they want and believe. I believe that Kant writes it like this to make the reader think about how it is their responsibility to think and make their own decisions. This is also what makes a good king, the ability to allow the people to think and question any laws that are put into place. However, the last part of the quote makes me wonder if Kant is saying that the king needs to unite his people under his laws or if the king needs to take the people’s opinions on laws into his own to unite them all. Since Kant is writing about the Enlightenment and being a good king I think it is that he wants the king to take the people’s opinions on laws into account instead of using just his laws and imposing them on the people. If the king allows for the people to speak their opinion on different laws, they would be thinking for themselves and being active in what is going on in their

Show More
Related
894 Words | 4 Pages

In paragraph twelve the King brings up the clergy’s point of his willingness to break laws. In response to this King quotes St. Augustine “an unjust law is no law at all.” In order to counter this point King asserts “just and unjust laws require moral judgement.” Therefore meaning morally unjust laws should not be followed. This allows King to appeal to those who regard morals as the way to live life.

Read More
1225 Words | 5 Pages

Philosopher Rousseau disagreed that power came from the king, but rather it comes from the people. He believed, “The people, being subject to the laws, ought to be their author” ( Doc 5) Kings would input laws, with really no consent others, and during the enlightenment that idea was changed. Not only was the idea of divine right challenged in many ways, but also freedoms. During the Age of Absolutism, many were not able to express their opinion, nor be able to express their opinions.

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

By dismantling the clergymen’s claim, King proves the innocence and integrity of his actions. In another attempt at criticizing him, the clergymen claim that King must advocate for protesters to adhere to and comply with all laws, regardless of their opinions, because he constantly demands for peaceful protest. However, he refutes this statement by alluding to St. Augustine’s belief “that ‘an unjust law is no law at all’” (King 4). St. Augustine’s comment on the legitimacy of a law signifies that if a law is immoral or degrades the human character, then the law is deemed invalid and should never have been instituted in the first place.

Read More
1677 Words | 7 Pages

This ideology is counter to that of liberalism as it infringes on the natural rights of its citizens, and it is undemocratic as this society would not have the consent of the governed as a whole. Furthermore, counters the rule of law because the author believes the authority should never be challenged, and therefore the author suggests that the authority is exempt of these laws. A thinker such as Hobbes would agree with the author of this source as he believed that without a strong government it would lead to nation wide chaos, such as that that the author describes through the use of the phrase, “A society that allows authority to be challenged will never succeed.”. Additionally, Locke would disagree with all parts of this source, as he believed that individuals know for themselves what is best and therefore should have the freedom to make their own decisions. For the second sentence of this source Locke and Rousseau would both disagree as they believed that consent of the governed was vital to society, which directly contradicts the authors issues with the challenging

Read More
771 Words | 4 Pages

A King does what he wants no matter who or how many people oppose his

Read More
817 Words | 4 Pages

In his letter, King defines a just law in his own words. According

Read More
1919 Words | 8 Pages

Thus, demonstrating how critical the right to speak is for commoners, who have a great amount of opinions in their mind that they are not allowed to say in an absolute monarchy. Voltaire’s statement played a large role in the democratic government of the 17th and 18th centuries due to how the freedom of speech was one of the most vital aspects in a democracy. The provision to speak one’s mind from a democratic government not only strengthens society and prevents revolts from the civilians, but it will also increase and spread of culture and ideas throughout the country. For example, Martin Luther’s decision to publicize his thoughts about

Read More
699 Words | 3 Pages

King comes to the conclusion that, when laws are unjust it is the duty of all citizens to stand up against them, cause tension, and try to evoke

Read More
503 Words | 3 Pages

The people also debated that individual freedom was the key to religious peace and human well-being. Voltaire, french philosophe, believed that governments denied free religious expression because of conflict. But contradicting that, people having the right to practice their own religion freely. They will be able to get along (Doc B). Restricting the right to chose which god you want to praise only leads to even worse

Read More
862 Words | 4 Pages

While influenced by others the human race is individually minded, and has been able to obtain much knowledge at a substantial rate because of enlightenment. Throughout history man was able to shape the face of the earth by controlling others, but until the age of enlightenment man was not fully aware of the accomplishments he could achieve. In this period the ideals of society having a voice, changed history through bringing light to the genius and talent of not one but the vast majority of the world. To challenge one’s self-worth enlightenment must be achieved through leaving a cowardly stage to become mature. Presently, the enlightenment ideals have given many people around the globe a chance at a free life through natural rights and tolerance,

Read More
1529 Words | 7 Pages

By the freedom of opinion, cannot be meant the right of thinking merely; for of this right the greatest Tyrant cannot deprive his meanest slave; but it is freedom in the communication of sentiments [by] speech or through the press” (Voices of Freedom, Chapter

Read More
959 Words | 4 Pages

King makes the point that a law is just if it follows the Law of God and Unjust if it doesn’t. King goes on further to explain a just law is a law that a “power majority group” wants a minority group to follow and is willing to follow the same law itself. On the other end of the spectrum an unjust law would be if the Majority group isn’t willing to follow the same law they are requiring a minority group to follow. With all of Kings bashing of laws in the letter King takes a step back to clarify that he doesn’t want everyone to go out and break the law, he says this would lead to anarchy. He also says “One who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty.”

Read More
651 Words | 3 Pages

This restriction of freedom allows humans to become lazy and immature which prevents them from becoming Enlightened. Kant argues that once people embrace laziness and immaturity, it becomes difficult to think by one’s self. He believes in the use of two types of reason, the public and private use of reason. He claims that the public use of reason alone can bring mankind into Enlightenment because it is this reasoning that allows groups of people with similar thoughts and criticisms to take a stance on a specific issue and bring it to the attention of the king.

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

The philosophy of Enlightenment has been most famously summarised in Immanuel Kant's essay, “An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment?” Kant's answer in 1784 to the question what is Enlightenment? Is that it is a “human being's emergence from his self-incurred tutelage” which is the inability to use one's own understanding without direction from another.” The immaturity is self-incurred when it is caused not by lack of mental capacity but by the lack of resolution. Kant urges each of us to refuse to remain under tutelage of others. In Kant's opinion, we must think and decide for ourselves.

Read More
1333 Words | 6 Pages

Only those who are born with true philosophical understanding can rule. In the Second Treatise by John Locke, Locke addresses the state of nature, which is essentially equality and freedom. Even though people have liberty, they still need to obey natural laws. On the contrary of Plato’s just city, Locke believes that absolute authority is not a civil government. A civil society is where the majority rules.

Read More

More about Kant: What Makes A Good King?

Related Topics

Open Document