ipl-logo

Kantian Ethics: Should Maxine Get A Divorce?

817 Words4 Pages

Do you ever look at that couple from high school on your Facebook timeline, that is still together presently and think “wow, they are really high school sweethearts? They have been together for so long.” Imagine that couple being Maxine and Jack. Maxine and Jack have been together since their freshman year of high school and got married shortly after graduation in 2011. They have been married now six years, but it has been a rough journey through-out their marriage. In 2015, Jack lost his job with Boeing. He took the situation very hard and turned to drinking alcohol to cope with it. With excessive binging, he then becomes very abusive towards his high school sweetheart and wife Maxine; having zero motivation in finding another job. Maxine loves Jack, but she has become afraid of Jack; she fears her life and well-being, while being in the same space as him. What is the best …show more content…

In this essay, I will be explaining what Kantian Ethics says Maxine should do about her abusive marriage, and why she should undergo that action. Should Maxine get a divorce from her high school sweetheart Jack? According to Kant, he believes that religion and morality should not be in the same category when making a decision. Kant says, “in order to determine what is the right choice, you have to have a good source of reasoning, and should consider that action for other people who may benefit.” One way to do this is to derive from pure reason which is known to Kant as Categorical Imperatives. Categorical Imperatives are rules you absolutely have to follow, which does not include your religious outlook, your desires, and or moral obligations. There are two famous rules/laws that we can identify and use in this case. The first one is “Act such that the maximum (principal) of your action can be willed to become universal law.” What Kant is saying here is we should only take action that can be

Show More
Related
1090 Words | 5 Pages

The hypothetical imperative relies on a desired outcome: "If you want ____, you must do ____". Duty is removed from the hypothetical imperative. Categorical imperative carries far more nuance in Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, it takes on three different formulations in the text as moral law. Although these formulations are perhaps simply restating, individually, they provide unique insights into Kant's thinking. In the first formulation, Kant says "Act only in accordance with that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it become a universal law" (Kant 421).

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

Immanuel Kant’s, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, pages 516-521, discusses the concept of the categorical imperative. The categorical imperative serves as the foundational principle for moral reasoning. Kant states, “There is therefore only one categorical imperative and it is this: “Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law,” (Kant, 516). He explains the categorical imperative as a universal moral law. He says it applies to all rational beings.

Read More
658 Words | 3 Pages

With the idea of a categorical imperative for a duty, it follows the though of it being pure. Being a pure thought and taken from experiences we can get morally actions as they are truly intuitive. Such as helping one another is moral and priori. Although we can be taught to help others, all are born with the thought of helping each other. It follows the rules of nature, as humans are social creature.

Read More
507 Words | 3 Pages

In conclusion, Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative, in my opinion, is the most appropriate approach to ethics and morals. It is an example of a deontological ethic that is based on reason. On the other hand, utilitarian ethics is an example of teleological ethics that uses both reasons and feelings in order to

Read More
1063 Words | 5 Pages

Established by Kantian ethics is the duty of our actions. Kant states that through reflection and reason we can acquire our duties from the categorical imperative. The categorical imperative is a moral obligation that is not contingent on a specific individual. I find this claim credible especially in conflicts between patients and their physicians. This assertion is convincing based on the following reasons of equality, universality and responsibility.

Read More
3638 Words | 15 Pages

Similarly to the followers of the divine command ethics, Kant strived to formulate a consistent set of ethical rules. However, Kant argued that ethical maxims should be derived from reason and not given by God. Believing that all humans were rational beings, Kant concluded that there is no need for depending on divine commands, as the universal moral rules that he believed existed could be derived through common sense. Kant called these maxims categorical imperatives and believed that they should fulfill the following requirements: They should be determined by reason.

Read More
898 Words | 4 Pages

In our complex society there are relationships that succeed and comparably many that do not. With that being said, a successful marriage is a commitment between two people who chose to love, respect, understand each other, and are willing to put forth the efforts that is needed to reach their shared goals, while they grow and improve individually. Stephanie Coontz (2006) portrays that, “For a couple to live happily ever after, they must love each other. She goes on to say that, “Each must make the partner the top priority in life” (p. 20). As a result, there are some key components that couples should focus on and even make them a priority in order to maintain a healthy relationship.

Read More
1216 Words | 5 Pages

All though Kant’s moral thoery does not itself address the morality of abortion, I believe that it can be effectively applied to the contemporary discourse on the moral status of abortion. Some modern thinkers, like Harry Gensler for example, use Kantian moral theory to argue that abortion is to be seen as morally impermissible while others, like Susan Feldman, Judith Jarvis Thompson and Lara Denis for example, agrue pro-choice and hence make abortion seem problematic, yet nevertheless morally permissible. In this essay I shall atempt to do just that – to argue that according to Kantian ethics, abortion is morally permissible and hence, that the woman’s right to self-defence is in fact her duty towards herself and as such outweighs the fetus’

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

Kant believes in the formula of universal law, which is act only on that maxim that at the same time you could will as a universal law. This formula can be applied to any situation; for example, one cannot kill because it cannot be willed as a universal law. He also believes

Read More
1036 Words | 5 Pages

Firstly what is a Categorical Imperative? Well according to Robert Johnson who wrote in ‘The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy’ “it is an imperative because it is a command… It is categorical in virtue of applying to us unconditionally…” so in other words it is moral actions that Kant wants us to apply universally without thought. Second is that of Maxims; Garrath Williams who also wrote in The Stanford Encyclopaedia said “the principle that unity is to be sought after none the less forms (what Kant calls) a ‘maxim’ or regulative principle or reason.”

Read More
1222 Words | 5 Pages

I hope to convince the reader that Kant’s Categorical Imperative is the better way to live a morally conscious life and more practical to follow as well. First I will briefly describe both Kant’s and Mill’s principles. Then I will go on to explain the advantages and disadvantages of both. Finally, I hope to provide a counterargument for some of Kant’s Categorical Imperatives downfalls. Kant states the Categorical Imperative as: "Act as if the maxim of your action were to become through your will and general natural law."

Read More
170 Words | 1 Pages

Kant's theory of the categorical imperative states that human is the ultimate value and should be regarded as an end. The basic idea for Kant's categorical imperative is to do the right thing because the idea of it being right is the sole reason for doing it. An action is not right or wrong based solely on the reason by which it was performed, but our intent which makes all the difference. Kant only cares about our ethical motivations and actions. Intentionally stating statements as anything but the truth, is lying.

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

The categorical imperative is an unconditional command, which, for Kant, told us what our duties were. This is a deontological theory, which means it points to the actions that are good in themselves and pursue the ultimate aim of reaching supreme good, while also telling us which actions are forbidden. This theory is based on duty. To act morally is to do one’s duty, and one’s duty is to obey the moral law. This theory distinguishes between duty and inclination and accepts that if something can’t be done, then there is no guilt.

Read More
1374 Words | 6 Pages

Hypothetical imperatives are duties that people ought to observe if certain ends are to be achieved. Categorical imperatives are the absolute and universal laws that guide moral actions. Kant believed that moral actions must be based on unconditional reasoning. Kant’s deontological principles of hypothetical imperatives and categorical imperatives have significantly influenced the medical field.

Read More
544 Words | 3 Pages

Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative is a theory of ethics. Essentially Kant gives us his definition of what imperative means, which he defines as something that a person has to do. The categorical imperative is something that a person has to do, regardless of the circumstances surrounding that situation. Kant expands on his ethical theory by creating a new idea called a maxim. What a maxim essentially is, is saying what you want to do, and giving reasons why you want to do it.

Read More

More about Kantian Ethics: Should Maxine Get A Divorce?

Related Topics

Open Document