ipl-logo

Kantianism's Objectification To Criticize Assisted Suicide

1454 Words6 Pages

The ethical theory of utilitarianism judges an action to maximize happiness and diminish pain for those who are affected or involved. Everything that we do, or cause, will affect the outcome and we should think of how our actions and judgments can be carried out to promote happiness for us and those around us. One of the main ideas of utilitarianism is consequentialism, meaning to maximize pleasure through the consequences of our actions. Another important concept of utilitarianism is impartiality, that everyone’s happiness is equally the same. This accounts for everyone’s happiness that is involved in the situation, but it must maximize the most pleasure overall. This then brings to another important aspect of utilitarianism, which is hedonism. …show more content…

Kant proposes his theory to be strict and law binding, but he then suggested exceptions for certain rules, depending on certain circumstances. Kant provides us a rule that we must all follow, but later that rule can change. For example, we can use people as a means if we are honest about our intentions. Yet, the Formula of Humanity denies we should use people as a means at all because we are all rational. If he can propose to alter a rule like this, what is it to say he can also alter any rule just because he had said so? This leaves room for some following up unanswered questions to what exactly is the moral “law” when the law itself can also be flexible? Kantianism seems to be flexible for different uses and for various objectives without a concrete boundary. Utilitarianism has only one objective and that’s to promote the most happiness from a single outcome. Utilitarianism provides more clarity and a convincing theory directly to this issue. Since assisted suicide is a sensitive subject, I think it is best to use utilitarianism because it also accounts for the people who are involved or affected by the issue. I believe this is important because any tragedy, like a death that occurs in the family, can affect a person’s well-being. A death can alter how a person would normally function and respond to society and result in a state of depression, etc. Therefore, the relative that’s affected by the death will have trouble grieving. If we didn’t consider the people around us, imagine how the world would be. The world would be inconsiderate, and people will be selfish. This would also mean that hurting people intentionally would be morally acceptable. Allowing an ethical theory like utilitarianism helps us reflect upon ourselves and understand that what we do can potentially affect others and utilitarianism allow us to

Show More
Related

Hypothetical Cases In Judith Jarvis Thomson's The Trolley Problem

1075 Words | 5 Pages

Utilitarianism or the Greatest Happiness Principle, accounts actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness (The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, Page 752). The morality of an action depends solely on the consequences of the action. According to Mill no amount of physical pleasure can replace mental pleasure. Every act is permissible once it serves as a means for pleasure and denounces pain. An Action’s consequences are measured and valued according to the number of individual’s happiness.

Read More

Ethical Theory: Extreme Utilitarianism) And Restricted (GHP)

1377 Words | 6 Pages

Before addressing the prompt, one needs to establish a baseline for utilitarianism. Mill’s definition of utilitarianism says that the best actions are the ones that produce the most happiness and the least amount of pain for everyone involved. There are two subcategories that fall under the umbrella of the ethical theory: extreme (act) and restricted (rule). Extreme utilitarians focus on a person’s possible actions and the different consequences they could produce. The Greatest Happiness Principle (GHP) is a system to determine which action creates the most happiness for everyone involved.

Read More

Just War Theory

985 Words | 4 Pages

Utilitarianism focuses on that the end goal of human action is to be happy which is called the greatest happiness principle which is when an action is considered right if it promotes the most happiness and the least pain. According to John Stuart Mill, “By happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure”(96). It’s the view that happiness is in pleasures. Humans contain higher pleasures which are feelings, intellect, and success but also contains lower pleasures like eating, sex, etc. “The higher pleasures are superior to the lower ones.

Read More

Utilitarianism In The Walking Dead

693 Words | 3 Pages

Utilitarianism is the theory that we should always try to bring about as much happiness as possible. It is hard to argue against the value of being happy, but critics are quick to point out that we value many other things as well. (Sir Bernard Williams, Rachels, 2010, p. 40) For me, this subject can be quite a tough one, and I will be honest, it is seriously causing me to think. The best way I can think of is this.

Read More

John Stuart Mills Act Utilitarianism

1584 Words | 7 Pages

In everyday life we make decisions, which in some way affect those around us, but should those decisions benefit us as an individual, or should they benefit the “greater good”? Utilitarianism, based on utility, states that we should, in fact, act for the greater good of the greater majority, rather than what we consider to be best for ourselves. The ethical theory of Utilitarianism was proposed by John Stuart Mills from a qualitative hedonistic view which states that there is only “one foundational good” (Burnor and Raley). Because Utilitarianism states that there is only one right moral standard, it falls under the view of Objectivism, in which there is only one universal moral standard.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Utilitarianism

889 Words | 4 Pages

As a utilitarian, you must follow the principle of utility - that is, every action must be optimific, in that they must do more to improve overall well-being for every living species than any other possible action that could have been taken. In order to define whether an action is optimific, one would first determine what is intrinsically good; those being happiness, autonomy, knowledge, and virtues. A utilitarian only values happiness overall. Next, one must determine what is intrinsically bad, and examples of those are physical pain, mental anguish, sadistic impulses, and the betrayal of innocent lives; though, utilitarianism finds faring poorly in life as intrinsically bad. Once everything is defined, one must now weigh their options, and evaluate the outcome of the actions.

Read More

Ethical Ethics Vs Utilitarianism

1200 Words | 5 Pages

Utilitarianism is an effort to provide an answer to the practical question. Velasquez (2006) posited “Utilitarianism is a general term for any view that holds that actions and policies should be evaluated on the basis of the benefits and costs they will impose on society”. This belief goes all the way back to Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill who we consider to be the founders of the philosophical concept of traditional utilitarianism. These two were of the belief that once our actions were right we tend to project happiness whereas if the action is wrong the outcome is unhappiness. Happiness was just not felt by the doer but also by everyone affected by the action and vice versa for the wrong action.

Read More

Example Of Utilitarianism

1349 Words | 6 Pages

Utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory based on the “greatest happiness for the greatest number” principle. In other words, a utilitarian would deem any action right if it brings more “pleasure” than “pain” to a greater number of people. It is a popular theory because of the welfarism at its core- the desire to bring happiness to all sentient beings. However, upon examining it in our judicial system it becomes apparent welfarism has less to do with the happiness of society and more to do with how financially well the country is.

Read More

Egoism Vs Altruism

1245 Words | 5 Pages

In which, utilitarianism introduces the idea that “one should maximize pleasure and minimize pain for all parties involves in a decision” (Leib slide 12). To summarize, this concept states that there should be “the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people” (Palmer 273). This philosophical view makes the most sense in today’s society by eliminating things that cause pain away from

Read More

Critical Analysis Of John Stuart Mill's 'Utilitarianism'

1564 Words | 7 Pages

Utilitarian suggest that we make our moral decisions from the position of a benevolent, disinterested spectator. Rather than thinking about

Read More

Utilitarianism In Business Ethics

1685 Words | 7 Pages

Utilitarianism is a teleological ethical theory based on the idea that an action is moral if it causes the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. The theory is concerned with predicted consequences or outcomes of a situation rather than focusing on what is done to get to the outcome. There are many forms of utilitarianism, having been introduced by Jeremy Bentham (act utilitarianism), and later being updated by scholars such as J.S. Mill (rule utilitarianism) and Peter Singer (preference utilitarianism). When referring to issues of business ethics, utilitarianism can allow companies to decide what to do in a given situation based on a simple calculation. Many people would agree that this idea of promoting goodness

Read More

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Utilitarianism

1109 Words | 5 Pages

Utilitarianism is a relativistic ethic because each time the outcomes of each ethical questions will be different. Utilitarianism considers the consequences of the action as an assessment of whether an action is morally right or wrong. The beginnings of utilitarianism are often accredited to Jeremy Bentham. Bentham adopted the view of Hedonism which states that the only thing intrinsically good, or right, is pleasure (Nathanson, n.d.).

Read More

Compare And Contrast Professional And Virtue Ethics

1082 Words | 5 Pages

The word utility is very due to the reasoning of actions. Sometime one’s pain gives pleasure of others. Utilitarianism is linked with straightforwardness in decision matters and keeps in mind the moral side of any action for any situation in which we find

Read More

Difference Between Mill And Utilitarianism

204 Words | 1 Pages

Utilitarianism, like Aristotle’s eudaemonism, is a consequentialist ethical theory concerned with the outcome of an action. The utilitarian approach to morality is concerned with acts being right or wrong dependant on whether they “further or impede the achievement of this end.” Despite their differences, both Utilitarianism and Aristotle’s virtue are concerned

Read More

Hedonism: What Defines A Good Life?

956 Words | 4 Pages

Utilitarianism is a moral theory that focuses in the result or consequences of a certain action, disregarding the intentions overall. Making good consequences is equal to good actions (morally correct). Furthermore, utilitarianism comes with the idea of doing good for a greater number, so it’s not an egocentric ideology but one that is more thoughtful to others, like sacrificing a night out to help your family members, or deciding to go for Italian food even though you don’t like it but the rest of your family does. We choose the action that will produce the most happiness, for a greater number of people (principle of

Read More

More about Kantianism's Objectification To Criticize Assisted Suicide

Related Topics

Open Document