More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical issues in criminalmjustice system
Ethical issues in the criminal justice system
Ethical issues in criminal justice administration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical issues in criminalmjustice system
“Inmate Robyn Adams, with whom Anthony exchanged 50 letters while incarcerated, told investigators that Casey Anthony told her that she sometimes used "stuff" to put her daughter to sleep” (9). Even though, this can be considered hearsay, the evidence is in these letters and this inmates testimony. I feel that it would have helped the prosecutions case if they had Casey talk to a psychologist. This would have helped form a profile on Casey as a sociopath and a compulsive liar. “If [the jury] did not see in the photographs of how Caylee was found what we saw, and what other people see, then that's
This finding proved that while Jennifer swore it was Ronald based on his appearance, it is not. Additionally, there is the fact that there was suspect bias represented in Jennifer choosing Ronald and continuing to believe that it was Ronald behind the crime even when evidence proved otherwise. So, eliminating as much suspect bias would have made an exponential difference in identifying the correct person. There are issues with relying on eyewitness testimonies, especially when it comes to a traumatic event such as sexual violence. Specifically stated by Smith and Hattery (2011) is that almost all wrongful convictions from other studies were resulting from the lack of reliability with eyewitness testimonies.
The Child Cases discusses cases and contains interviews from people wrongfully accused and sentenced for murder of young children. The main example PBS provided was Ernie Lopez and the death of 6 month old Isis. This video addresses the biased medical examiners opinions and how they can affect the trial and sentencing. Often the medical examiner can imagine things in order to find an answer for the death of a young child. Ernie was babysitting 6 month old Isis when he walked back from preparing her bath and found her unresponsive.
In fact, much of the court case is based on onlookers who barely saw any of the incident. Much of what was said was falsified. “Questions were asked of the incident. Lies were given as answers (page 144).” The verdict was decided based on the untruths, and Madam got to choose a punishment for
In order to make its case, the prosecution relied on erroneous forensic science and flawed expert witness testimony. In 1982 the initial trial, based almost exclusively on expert witness testimony, resulted in the baby’s mother, Lindy Chamberlain, being convicted of murder while the father, Michael Chamberlain, was found guilty
In result, she killed her daughter Kailey. In the beginning of the trial, I found it very interesting that the judge was the one to read to the jury. The opening of the
Her story changed so many times that the psychiatrists knew that they could not be true. Aileen had several trials where she tried to convince the jury but she was not guilty of murder. But the jury saw through her lies and sentenced Aileen to the death penalty.
After a 10 and a half hour meeting, they absolved her on the charge of murder and only found Casey Anthony guilty of perjury. The verdict exasperated American society. America felt pity towards Casey and had no sympathy for her mother. Everyone who listened to the case all over the world was shocked by this verdict of the jury, all of the evidence, the surrounding the murder of the child was indicated only one person, the girl's mother, Casey therefore, this evidence was just enough for the jury to plead a guilty verdict. After this case, many americans believed that the justice system in America failed completely and In this case it was almost impossible to bring forward charges under articles regarding the death penalties It wasn’t optional to produce the first degree murder.
"Severe mental illness like psychosis can lead to a tragedy like this - that people can see things that aren't real and hear things that aren't real and believe things that aren't real, and act in that distorted reality." -Andrea Yates Andrea Yates, who was eventually found innocent, was convicted for the murder of her 5 children. Since then, this has been a very controversial court case where people’s opinions are all over the boards. The debate between her being guilty or innocent has created a calamity within the eyes of the court and everyone who was present during the trials.
After accusing Ray Buckely, she pursued more allegations against the school using weak evidence. According to information about the trial compiled by law Professor Douglas O. Linder, “[Judy Johnson] claimed that Peggy Buckey, Ray’s mother, was involved in satanic practices … most prosecutors would come to recognize Johnson's allegations as the delusions of a paranoid schizophrenic, but the snowball of suspicion had started rolling.'' (Linder). Professor Linder demonstrates that Judy is responsible for the controversy at McMartin Preschool. He illustrates how Judy’s lies led to an unnecessary investigation and wrongful imprisonment.
Each day, the courtroom was filled with reporters, writers, and friends who camped out at 2 am with hopes of getting a seat. At the first trial, they had brought up sexual molestation and the self-defense plea. Lyle falsely testified that his father violated him when he was 7 years old, and 13 when his mom stopped. Erik dishonestly explained Lyle and he shared that their parents were abusing them when Kitty slapped Lyle, and Erik was shocked when his brother’s hair fell off. Lyle’s old girlfriend, Jamie Pisarcik, testified that Erik couldn’t have been shocked when Lyle’s baldness was revealed because Erik had told her the previous spring about Lyle wearing a toupee.
Per Julie’s request I have made a summary of some of the witnesses that were called in the 2001 hearing transcript for a motion for a new trial. The specific witnesses in question are Donavan Rouse, Thrista Rouse, Lucritia Rouse, and Rosemary Rouse. All five of these witnesses maintained the same general story that they had lied in order to go back home, and that their uncles had never touched them in an inappropriate manner. All children also stated that the line of questioning from the FBI was the same for every child questioned.
The McMartin preschool trial took place in Manhattan Beach, California where a 39-year-old psychotic mother accused Virgina McMartin, ‘the owner of the preschool,’ her daughter, her two grandkids, and three other teachers of molesting her 2-year-old child. The Council of Institutional Investigators, also known as the CII, interviewed the children who went to the preschool. The CII claimed that “more than 90% of the 400 preschoolers experienced sexual abuse” New York Times stated the kids used dolls to show the CII what had happened to them and due to the book Michelle Remembers sexual and ritual abuse was just starting to be talked about and people all around the world did not know quite yet how to handle
(Rose), he knows what the jurors are there to do and he doesn’t want time being wasted on petty disputes. The Physical Education Teacher also remained unbiased and never took one juror's side over another’s, even if he completely agreed with one of them. He could have abused the fact that he was the Foreman and used that to persuade others to listen to what he had to say or used it to change other jury members vote to guilty; however, he never did that. The Physical Education Teacher was the best juror because he showed that he has respect for the other jury members by listening to what they had to say and by being unbiased towards the opinions that were different than
The discretion of the case was significant in the regard of the defense, which countered some contradicted evidences. The evidences from the trial and the hearing preliminaries have revealed that the children were coached. The testimony showed lack of credibility on the issues and showing the significance of the discretion on the defense. McMartin told his attorney that he did not do it and his attorney used his discretion and believed him.
