Service men and women should be able to keep the dog they trained. They share a bond together. they will not want to break that bond. After fighting in wars, the army men and women won’t want to give up their dog. Their dog helped keep them alive. They spend so much time together, that they won’t want to be separated.
If you don’t let army men and women keep their dogs, then that’s being harsh. Army men and women fight in wars, and risk their life. With an army dog, their life is safer. they build relationships with the dog they trained. They become used to being around each other all the time. Army men and women should be able to keep the army dog forever.
If you separate them, the army men and women will fight to get the dog back. They will
…show more content…
Zenit had found bomb after bomb at this point.”
Even after army men and women get their army dog back, they still take care of them like they did in the Army. They walk, feed, play, and take them to get groomed. They stay partners. The text says,” He attended to the dog’ s every need, from grooming to making sure Zenit didn’t get dehydrated. Jose says, He is still my quiet partner.”
Now if you still want to separate the army men and women from their army dog, that’s still being harsh. They took care of the dog’s so well. There is no promise that the new army men and women will do the same to take care of the army dog. They might not have that bond with each other. The army dog could hate their new trainer. Something horrible could happen.
This is why you should let army men and women keep their army dog. You wouldn’t have to have the possibility of something bad happening. Keeping them together is better for them! They have a bond that won’t be broken. Their friendship will grow stronger. Also the army men and women can take care of the army dogs. They wouldn’t have the possibility of not being treated right. You should keep army men and women with their army dogs, NOT separate