More handpicked essays just for you.
Development of fascism research paper
An authoritarian leadership style pros and cons
Fascism and totalitarianism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Instead of giving the people of Congo freedom, he took it away and made them work extremely hard, and giving them impossible quotas to meet. If they were not meet, he would cut off their family members hands, and their own to make them work harder, and as punishments. He would take the resources that they got, and used them to make him rich, and make the land flourish in terms of buildings, and making it more urbanized, but the Congo people were struggling to live everyday. As a result, thousands of Congo people were killed for the brutal work King Leopold made them do, and the population decreased significantly. Because of his actions King Leopold should be condemned as a criminal for his exploration and abuse to the Congo land and people.
With the passing of decades, most Europeans mistakenly believed that King Leopold spent his considerable fortune funding public works in the Congo and stopping slavery in East Africa. He was the unintimidating King of Belgium; but it was all a sham. Underneath the veneer of generosity and graciousness laid a cunning and self-engrossed scoundrel, a duplicitous fraud to rival the evil charm of Iago or Richard III. Under the guise of an international charitable foundation, he personally owned the colony of the Congo, and he ran it as a brutal business investment. His “charity” resulted in the death of ten million people, approximately 50% of the population in the Congo.
The hypocrisy of King Leopold is soon challenged for his edicts on banning slave trade from a few witnesses. However, King Leopold is the reaper of native lands along the west coast port and eastern province because
Imperialism in the late nineteenth century was sparked from the rise of industrialization throughout the world and the competition for new territory. Modernized countries took advantage of uncivilized nations in order to utilize their available resources and to compete with their civilized counterparts. Western imperialist countries in the late nineteenth century exploited periphery countries and hindered them economically and human-environmentally for the purpose of their own wealth and benefit, despite some arguments that outline a mutually beneficial global economy from imposing a strong, powerful government in these unstable places in order to control and maintain the chaotic behavior of the natives. By using the India and Congo case studies,
In summary, propaganda, persecution, and industrialization are ways dictators use to gain and maintain power because with it they can get people to trust
Yet, no one dares to rebel against the government and their crude form of control. There is minor opposition to the authority in this society because people are born with the ideas dictated into their minds and harsh penalties come with the actions. The way people were raised and taught by the Councils’ relentless guidelines forces them to live a life of obedience and fear. From a very young age, children were taught to
Overall, Louis XIV showed throughout the time of his reign, he wanted complete power and control over everyone, and
A historical villain’s actions are selfish, they only help themselves and it ends up hurting others, they do whatever they want to get what they need. It’s proven that King Leopold is
To begin, the foundation of every government’s power has always been fear. Governments depend on public fear to secure societal position. Tracing back to thousands of years ago, governments relied primarily on conquests. The research author Robert Higgs argues, “Losers who were not slain in the conquest itself had to endure the consequent rape and pillage and in the long term to acquiesce in the continuing payment of tribute to the insistent rulers.” In other words, Higgs’s point emphasizes that the government violently conquested lands and hence attacked people living there in the old times.
It is seen that the power rid of Napoleon’s conscience, and created a ruthless dictator.
While the protagonist, Alex, may choose vicious acts, he chooses them with a clear ethical capacity. On the other hand, when being controlled by the government, he loses the part of him that makes him human. Individuals may not always make the best choice, but humanity comes from a human’s ability to choose between right and wrong. In this case, the destruction of Alex’s humanity proves that it is better to be bad by choice, than to be good by government coercion.
BACKGROUND “Obedience is an active or deliberate form of social influence, which involves someone in authority requiring us to behave in a particular was in a particular situation.” (Gross, R 2015:446) Stanley Milgram (1963) ‘behavioural study of obedience’ was “originally attempting to test the ’Germans are different’ hypothesis” (Gross, R 2012:226) to explain how a dictator like Hitler was able to coerce thousand to execute millions of Jews, Poles and others within his Nazi reign between the 1930s and 1940s. Milgram had planned to conduct this study in Germany, once he had completed these American studies but due to the conclusion, further studies were not necessary. This study focuses “on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal
In a very real sense, humankind has been able advance in a variety of manners from organized conflict. These outcomes would likely not be possible without the kind of domination that is found in a powerful and all encompassing overseer. This is true of not only various excursions and wars, but also of coups d’état. In the latter sense, a reigning party has often taken hold as supreme authority while simultaneously imposing especially stringent laws.
When somebody receives incredible power, they also receive a large burden of responsibility. Some people, such as Napoleon, disregard these responsibilities and become corrupt. In reality, we have seen this in leaders such as Stalin, who became corrupt once into power. In “Animal Farm”, Napoleon, a totalitarian pig, is a great example of how too much power is equal to corruption.
“ ‘With such precautions the courtiers might bid defiance to contagion. The external world could take care of itself. In the meantime it was folly to grieve, or to think.” King Prospero. Through history, such convictions summoned up notorious class division, hostility, fanaticism, corruption, social and economic privation.
