The style which is selected that should be fit in organization, situation etc.
Autocratic Leadership Style
Autocratic is an outermost form of transactional leadership, there will be complete power on staff. Lesser opportunity for making suggestions from staff, even if these are in the best interest of the team or organization. The benefit of autocratic leadership is that it is incredibly efficient. Quick decisions are made. The work to implement those decisions can begin immediately. In terms of disadvantages, most staff resent being dealt with in this way. In crises situation autocratic style can be used, when decisions must be made quickly and without dissent.
Bureaucratic Leadership Style
This style follows rules rigidly, and tries to make
…show more content…
Charismatic leadership is a leadership style that is identifiable but may be perceived with less tangibility than other leadership styles. Often called a transformational leadership style, charismatic leaders inspire eagerness in their teams and are energetic in motivating employees to move forward. The after excitement and commitment from teams is an enormous asset to productivity and goal achievement. The negative side of charismatic leadership is the amount of confidence placed in the leader rather than in employees. This can create the risk of a project or even in an entire organization collapsing if the leader leaves. Additionally, a charismatic leader may come to believe that she/he can do no wrong, even when others are warning him or her about the path she/he is on; feelings of impassable can ruin a team or an …show more content…
Laissez-faire, this French phrase for “let it be,” when applied to leadership describes leaders who allow people to work on their own. Laissez-faire leaders position responsibilities and avoid making decisions, they may give team’s complete freedom to do their work and set their own deadlines. Laissez-faire leaders usually allow their subordinate the power to make decisions about their work. They provide teams with resources and advice, if needed, but otherwise do not get involved. This leadership style can be effective if the leader monitors performance and gives feedback to team members regularly. The main advantage of laissez-faire leadership is that allowing team members so much autonomy can lead to high job satisfaction and increased productivity. It can be damaging if team members do not manage their time well or do not have the knowledge, skills, or motivation to do their work effectively. This type of leadership can also occur when managers do not have sufficient control over their