ipl-logo

What Are The Advantages And Disadvantages Of Autocratic Leadership

807 Words4 Pages

Task 2.3 - Comparison of leadership style
Autocratic Leadership
Mr. Worthy
Mr. Worthy would summon a messenger or a secretary from the offices on the second floor and send memo out to one another group of workers. He was always absent and he made decision from above and he always spent time with friends at extended lunches so he is an autocratic leader.
They give strict orders and except people to follow those orders. It is a must to listen to all those orders. They basically do not care about anyone’s feelings all they think is they like what they ae doing or not. Autocratic leaders will treat their employees like slaves and they will not care about the employees input. The advantage of autocratic leadership is your workers will listen to …show more content…

The manger will not have to rely for any help from other people to complete their task and they can decide what they want and they do not need to ask others and this will result in reduced stress.
Disadvantages of autocratic leadership
Fewer Personal Rights
• Autocratic leaders tend to assert dominance, commanding rather than discussing with others -- the opposite of democracy. In an autocratic leadership, one person or a small group make all the decisions. When autocratic leaders demand control, sometimes complete control, over others, it is called totalitarianism. When a totalitarian dictator is in charge, people have even fewer rights, as every aspect of life is decided by their ruler. Since autocratic leaders seldom have a committee of authorities designated to ensure fair treatment, abuse of power can be a side effect within autocracies.
Disadvantages: Limited Freedoms and Access to Information
• People living under an autocratic rule do not have the authority to speak out against unfair government laws, and in some cases such acts are punishable by death. So it basically has no freedom no person has any rights to talk anything they do not …show more content…

Democratic leadership is showing more care for the opinions of the employees. So employees will be willing to work for the company. Generally children in democratic has lesser output in their work but there is more quality than autocratic leadership. The advantage of democratic leadership is workers will be given a chance to give their input and Ms Hogan will be able to get more ideas. The disadvantage of democratic leadership is in times when Ms Hogan needs to take a decision quickly and she might not have time to ask others input.
Advantages:
• Democratic style of leadership can help with Office politics that can diminish the growth and development of a working environment. Almost all ideas are considered and carefully analysed.
• Communication gap is reduced resulting in less tension between the leader and team. Therefore, fear of rejection and denial decreases. Under autocratic leaders, subordinates would fear due to demands and expectations.
Disadvantages:
• Although some managers adopt democratic leadership, it is just to please their subordinates but they do not follow the technique fully. Resulting in taking ideas and not implementing them.
• Consulting every single member leads to a longer decision making process. A lot of patience and understanding is required when gathering all the

Show More
Related
1145 Words | 5 Pages

➢ A small business, with seven employees, and four employees report to Mr. Shilstone. 5. How would you describe your management style (e.g. authoritative, participative, or delegative)? ➢ The management style that Mr. Shilstone implements is participative and delegative.

Read More
284 Words | 2 Pages

A dictatorship is government ruled where one or more than one group is in full control over every aspect of government. It’s the absolute rule made my one person over many people that the government oversees. Now with the way dictatorship is set up, democracy and people’s opinions are hard to come by. This idea that every dictatorship is evil isn’t always the case. There are such things as a good dictator who listens to the people, but that is very rare.

Read More
1615 Words | 7 Pages

 These systems don 't allow people to have an input or freedom. The leaders of this dictatorship barely pay attention to what the people have to say.  Totalitarian rulers make an attempt to take control of the people

Read More
427 Words | 2 Pages

Dictatorship: Is the type of government in which a person followed by a political party or a specific group is in the possession of all the power. Generally, patriotic propaganda is used to exalt people’s nationality and the dictator. Moreover, there’s lots of censor in the means of communication. Such regime intervenes directly in people’s daily basis, including: censorship, repression, massacre to the opposition, etc. Totalitarianism:

Read More
598 Words | 3 Pages

Totalitarianism is a centralized government that does not tolerate parties of differing opinion and that exercises dictatorial control over many aspects of life and is commonly used by dictators. Dictators began using it in the early 1920’s and had an effect on the world soon after. In order for these dictators to obtain power, they need to do things to motivate people that the dictator”s beliefs are right, and that they have a solution to everyone's troubles. Some of the things they need to become a dictator is Propaganda, Terror, Charisma, Economic control, and Extreme nationalism, which was what Hitler, Mussolini, and Stalin.

Read More
226 Words | 1 Pages

Totalitarian governments dispute their intentions often end up doing more harm then good.in this government one or a select few individuals end up with all of the control of the government, in every aspect, everything from the military to the law making, to taxes, and more often that not it will benefit this single or group of people more. compared to democracy it stamps on more toes and controls people much more. in democracy ideally there are checks and balances to prevent once single people or group from getting to much power or influence on the system. ideally in a democratic system there are people who supported by like minded individuals speak their case and then work to set up a system that not only supports their ideas but hopefully

Read More
616 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout European history, there are many examples of many different kinds of governments and rulers, though one of the most controversial forms of government was that of the absolute monarchy. In an absolute monarchy, only one ruler exists, and they hold absolute power over any and all forms of government. This form of government was also somewhat religiously-oriented, as some advocates of absolutism believed that God specifically selected and exercise His power through these leaders. Despite the belief that those who ruled under an absolute monarchy were chosen by God's will, some of said rulers went on to abuse and misuse their power, leading to various rebellions and instilling hatred for these leaders in the minds of the public. Between the two sides, however, those who believe that absolutism is a dangerous form of government due to the dangers associated with giving one person unlimited power have more evidence for their claim.

Read More
549 Words | 3 Pages

Authoritarians implement fear to control their citizens, they will commit fraud in elections to ensure that they are able to remain in power, citizens are forced to pay taxes and obey the laws that their Dictator has implemented even though they have no say in making these laws. A modern-day example of an Authoritarian leader is Bashar al-Assad. Assad came into power due to his father and the baath party who came into power because of a 1963 military coup. He is a prime example of what it is to be an authoritarian lead because he has used election fraud, and intimidation to ensure that he will remain in power. Because Assad is a dictator and uses fear to rule his people, many of his citizens were afraid to go against his regime for fear that they would be

Read More
860 Words | 4 Pages

The list of reasons as to why a dictatorship is wrong goes on and on. But there is a short list as to why when done properly it can be a good thing. It goes back to the start of everything. The Romans proved it can help settle disputes and helps bring down violence. A dictatorship is a strict form of government and it can give structure to the people.

Read More
891 Words | 4 Pages

He can see the future and bring out the best in followers. Democratic- The democratic leader builds consensus through participation and this leadership also makes decision making by

Read More
805 Words | 4 Pages

Speedier process for the framework, Law making process less difficult, Less space for debasement are the benefits of Totalitarian while Liberal Democracy points of interest are Elected agents, Limits government powers. Totalitarian has bad marks like Power not concentrated, Slow process for the framework while; Power not concentrated, Slow process for the framework are the detriments of Liberal Democracy

Read More
877 Words | 4 Pages

(Cherry, 2016) Autocratic leaders normally settle on decisions in view of their thoughts, ideas and judgments and rarely acknowledge guidance or advice from followers. Autocratic leadership includes absolute, authoritarian control over a gathering. primary characteristics of autocratic leadership include, practically no contribution from members, group leaders manage all the work method, strategies and procedures, group members are infrequently trusted with choices or important assignments or tasks and lastly leaders settle on the choices and decisions. Autocratic leadership can be advantageous at times but there are additionally many occasions where this style can be problematic.

Read More
1637 Words | 7 Pages

This style of leadership can be advantageous in highly regulated lines of business, and it can be an efficient management style in companies that don 't require much creativity or innovation from employees. Bureaucratic leadership is one of the most prevalent forms of management today. Weber 's Ideal Bureaucracy is characterized by the following: ~Hierarchical Organization ~Delineated Lines Of Authority With Fixed Areas Of Activity ~Action

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

Middle men are eliminated since the dictator wishes to directly deal with the problems of the people, rendering direct access. Benevolent dictatorships places unsubstituble responsibility on the leader since all the decisions of the nation is in their hands. This would in turn get

Read More
934 Words | 4 Pages

Bass and Avolio (1993) pointed out that leadership style is based on behavior areas from laissez-fair (no leadership) to participative (take inputs from subordinate but ultimate decision making with the leader) through transactional leadership (which depends on reward system and punishments) to transformational leadership (which is based on inspiration and behavioral charisma) and ultimately Autocratic leadership (absolute power on decision making). The researcher selected above approach since it has been developed recently and efficiently demonstrated through research findings. The various components are further elaborated below; 1. Laissez-fair Style Laissez-fair leaders are characterized as an avoidant leader who may uninvolved with their subordinates. As per Mondy and Premeaux (1995), these leaders let group members to make all decisions.

Read More

More about What Are The Advantages And Disadvantages Of Autocratic Leadership

Related Topics

Open Document