ipl-logo

Kurt Lewin: Three Types Of Leadership Decisions

1417 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Compares and contracts two distinct, extant theories of leadership

Kurt Lewin
Kurt Lewin and his colleagues did an experiment in 1939 on leadership decisions and identified three different styles of leadership. These three styles, mentioned below revolve around decision making.
1. AUTOCRATIC
An autocratic leader takes decisions without consulting others in the team. This causes the highest level of discontent in his sub-ordinates. This style of leadership works when there is no need for input for the decision to be made. The motivation of the people is unruffled irrespective of being involved or not involved in decision – making to carry out subsequent tasks/actions.
2. DEMOCRATIC
A democratic leader involves the people in the process of decision-making. Although the final decision to be taken depends on …show more content…

Laissez – Faire works best when people are capable and motivated in making their own decisions, and where the requirement for a central coordination is nil or close to nil.
After identifying the above mentioned theories, we followed the KURT LEWIN theory of leadership as it is most widely used and covers the broad range of leadership styles.

Item Writing/ Test Construction
After going through the literature review, item writing was done for the desired test. Initially a set of 24 items were made - eight statements each corresponding to a particular leadership style was penned down. Following is the list of these 24 items:
1. The final decision making in my team is mostly done by me
2. I try to take in account opinions of one or more employees while taking a decision
3. I use majority voting as a method of taking an important decision
4. Consulting others can be time consuming, so I prefer not taking opinions of my team members while taking a decision
5. I appreciate varied ideas and inputs coming from my team members for an upcoming …show more content…

Validity analysis is either done to check for internal validity or external validity. There are many ways to measure validity. For this particular test we used factor analysis to determine the validity.
Factor analysis

A Varimax Rotation was performed to check for correlation between variables and the factor. The following results were obtained from the test. Figure 4: Rotated Component Matrix Response Analysis
Additionally, the responses were also analyzed to determine the type of leadership style that was exhibited by various people. The response for each person was segregated according to the three styles i.e., Democratic, Autocratic and Laissez Faire. Average of the response score for each style per person was calculated and based on the highest average score; the leadership style of each person was assessed. Figure 5: Response Analysis
The responses received can be tabulated as below. Out of the 51 people who responded, majority people follow ‘Democratic’ leadership style. References

https://www.statsoft.com/Textbook/Reliability-and-Item-Analysis

Show More
Related
1201 Words | 5 Pages

The way in which a leader selects their style of leadership is predominantly motivated by their underlying priorities and motives concerning the position at hand. These priorities are linked to the goals that the leader themselves wishes to accomplish in their position, but are often influenced by a variety of factors that are derived from two main concerns, the overall well-being of the institution under the leader’s administration and the approval of the people within that institution. The relationship between public approval and the well-being of the institution is often dichotomous in nature, which results in the leader having to make decisions that gravitate towards one side of the spectrum. This conflict between what is good for the institution

Read More
970 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout history, there have been great leaders who rule in vastly different ways. From Napoleon Bonaparte’s populism, to Stalin’s iron grip, to Julius Caesar’s inspiring tactical brilliance, a plethora of leadership styles have proved successful. However, in 1958, Ronald Lippit and Ralph White came to the controversial conclusion that a democratic leader bested all other forms of leadership. Bias in their research, as well as overwhelming evidence of successful, non-democratic leaders has led to dissention upon what style is most effective. Henslin offers three distinct types of leadership: an authoritarian leader who rules through strict orders and negative sanctions, a democratic leader who rules by gaining a consensus, and a laissez-faire

Read More
1537 Words | 7 Pages

The four main leadership styles are autocratic, democratic, laissez- faire, and paternalistic. Autocratic is referred to as an authoritarian or “all-powerful”

Read More
917 Words | 4 Pages

The styles, by name and brief description alone, will resonate with anyone who leads, is led, or, as is the case with most of us, does both. Coercive leaders demand immediate compliance. Authoritative leaders mobilize people toward a vision. Affiliative leaders create emotional bonds and harmony. Democratic leaders build consensus through participation.

Read More
1924 Words | 8 Pages

In spite of the fact that’ leadership analysis’ is the art of breaking down a leader into basic psychological components for study and use by academics and practitioners, a sound leadership analyses

Read More
788 Words | 4 Pages

Vugt et al. (2004) stated that in autocratic leadership style, employees are not involved in decision making, it is only leaders who decide what to do and how to do. While in democratic leadership, leaders allow employees to involve in decision-making process. Their involvement can be participative or consultative. In lassies-faire style of leadership, Leaders don’t exercise their control over employees and employees have freedom that they can do what they want without any hurdle.

Read More
2062 Words | 9 Pages

Kurt Lewin argued that there are three types of leaders. These are the Autocratic leaders, Democratic leaders and the Laissez-fair leaders. The Autocratic leaders are the ones that make decisions on their own without consulting their teams. This leadership style is most effective when quick decisions need to be made and there is no need for input from the team members. Democratic leaders are the ones that allow the team members to give their input before making any important decision.

Read More
876 Words | 4 Pages

Considering its relative newness, the reliability and validity of the Leadership Effective Scale can be directly attributed to its developers who considered the scale reliable because of its internal consistency as well as its coefficient alpha ratings ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 (1). Notably, I have in the past established the split-half method as a means of testing the reliability of an instrument. Nevertheless, the test that would be considered most appropriate is to be used in testing

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

If the behavior theory can identify the key determinants of leadership, people can actually train to become a leader. This is the premise of the management development plan. There are many different types of behavioural leadership styles. Each style suggests that the leadership role is based on the leaders’ concern for the people being led and the level of achievement that needs to be

Read More
1247 Words | 5 Pages

Leaders may show task or people orientated practices and may settle on choices using authoritarian, democratic, or laissez-faire styles. It appeared the Behavioural Theories overlooked the situational factors and the environment in which behaviours are demonstrated. The confinements of the Trait theory and the Behavioural theory prompted the move to the Contingency theory and improvement of possibility models. ("6 Leadership Theories to define Effectiveness of Leaders", 2017) Behavioural theories of leadership are classified as such because they focus on the examination of specific behaviours of a leader.

Read More
975 Words | 4 Pages

Laissez Faire Leaders are ones who choose not to intervene and will allow the group to make decisions independently. This style can happen automatically and will result in a loss of group direction if the leader is inadequate. Lewin (1985) found that when subjected to this style of leadership, group members were inclined to be aggressive towards each other and gave up easily when mistakes occur. In this style of leadership, the characteristics adopted by the leader depends fundamentally on how favourable the situation

Read More
1637 Words | 7 Pages

" Leadership is the ability of a superior to influence the behavior of subordinates and persuade them to follow a particular course of action." - Chester Barnard Max Weber 's Theory: Types of Leadership In Max Weber 's theory, he wrote about three types of leaderships: Bureaucratic, Charismatic, and Traditional. Weber was one of the first of the theorists to recognize that leadership itself was situational in nature, and that effective individuals needed to move dynamically from one type of leadership style to another to remain successful. 1] Bureaucratic Leadership "Bureaucratic administration means fundamentally domination through knowledge." Bureaucratic leadership is based upon fixed official duties under a hierarchy of authority, applying a system of rules for management and decision-making.

Read More
995 Words | 4 Pages

This model states that in this 21st century, it is impossible to rely on one management style to fit all situations (Educational-business-articles.com, 2016). In other words managers and leaders must be flexible, in order to get the best result out of their teams and individuals. In addition, this theory allows management and leadership to be able to identify and accurately diagnose the situation and vary employees’ behavior accordingly to the situation (Yukl and Mahsud, 2010). This will enable management and leadership at CIBCFCIB to select appropriate types of leadership behavior for each type of situation. Moreover, another impact that this theory has on organizational strategy whereby Charismatic leaders at CIBCFCIB can minimize various types of behaviour by increasing competent employees.

Read More
934 Words | 4 Pages

Bass and Avolio (1993) pointed out that leadership style is based on behavior areas from laissez-fair (no leadership) to participative (take inputs from subordinate but ultimate decision making with the leader) through transactional leadership (which depends on reward system and punishments) to transformational leadership (which is based on inspiration and behavioral charisma) and ultimately Autocratic leadership (absolute power on decision making). The researcher selected above approach since it has been developed recently and efficiently demonstrated through research findings. The various components are further elaborated below; 1. Laissez-fair Style Laissez-fair leaders are characterized as an avoidant leader who may uninvolved with their subordinates. As per Mondy and Premeaux (1995), these leaders let group members to make all decisions.

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

Experienced and trained employees that require little or no supervision falls under the laissez-faire leadership style. This leadership style affects a group success in that if the group is doing something wrong there is no feedback from management to make corrections since management do not directly supervise them and would led mistakes being made continuously. ● Autocratic- This leadership style managers makes all decisions with the input of others.

Read More

More about Kurt Lewin: Three Types Of Leadership Decisions

Related Topics

Open Document