I was disappointed with the movie because of how many things they changed. If they made the movie more similar to the book, it would’ve been much better. They tried too hard to make a good movie and they strayed away from the main points of the book. Something informative I learned from the book is how badly slaves were treated. They didn’t really show that in the movie.
Logan is a good movie based on how we see the archetype of the cause fighter, and now we will uncover on how other films are different from each other. In the Green Arrow, we see that the archetype of the cause fighter, with The Green arrow killing the enemies, back and forth, we also see that he tortures many enemy commanding officers till death. He kills to protect the city and the citizens within it. In daredevil, the lawyer from new york was erupted with super powers after he lost his sense of sight from a radioactive substance when he was
According to Gould, the 1960s television show Batman was an unexpected cultural revolution because for children watching television in the 60s, the Batman TV series was a joyfully relaxing exercise for them. Also, this became a comedy classic and it was a cultural phenomenon in the 1960s. The Batman TV series was famous because this series has humor and a colorful cast of villains. As well, Batman have some aspect of popular culture, that he represents the reflection of society making him a superhero. In addition, Batman in the society wants to do justice on a bad attitude committed.
It wasn’t a book that made me want to read the next chapter. It didn’t keep me on the edge of my seat. It was just boring. The movie didn’t have that much action either, but it still had more than the book did. I thought that Waller was more brutal in the book.
There are plenty of guns fights and loads of action scenes, but the grittiness is missing, replaced with a light-hearted vibe. The bad guys in the movie come across as caricatures, playing everything up to the point where the goofiness is boiling over. Much of that isn't a bad thing, as you'll definitely get a laugh or two during certain purposely funny
Even though the movie itself is not terrible, it is better and more realistic
I thought that this film was extremely well done. I was very creeped out by the events which occurred in the film, especially Tim’s abrupt and graphic suicide at the end of the film. I think that the directors were very effective in capturing the attention of the audience, and in allowing the audience to feel the fear and horror that the characters felt throughout the film. However, there were storylines that started very strong but were not developed throughout the film, which really upset me. An example of this is when Marco cheated on Karo with another girl, and Karo did not find out, which shows how the situation was never resolved.
I enjoyed the movie better than the book. It included just the right amount of action scenes, description words, and details from the story. The story was amazing but I like seeing things more than reading them. I usually like the movies better than the book.
Batman vs Superman For my compare and contrast paragraph I chose Batman vs Superman. Batman and Superman are alike in a lot of ways but there some differences. There are both alike because they are both super heroes, both from DC, and both are good at what they do. Batman in different from Superman is that Batman can’t fly and Superman can fly because his powers. Another thing is that Batman fights in Gotham the most crime ridden city.
I read the review of a kid’s film, “The Lego Movie” by Christy Lemire. The author seemed to be very surprised by the way she reacted to the film. She felt that it went beyond the traditional genre for children and provided a response in her review. What she felt astounding her, so much that she stated how the old cliché saying “I laughed, I cried” was very much true for her. The common expectations about the genre of the film that she points out in her review is catchy theme songs, predictable scenes, hacky punchlines, and an exhausting simple message.
The film that will be analysed is ‘The Dark Knight’ which is a drama/ crime film directed by Christopher Nolan, which was released on the 16th of July 2008. The director is trying to convey good vs evil through Lighting, sound, props, costumes, setting, camera angles and camera shots. The main characters in ‘The Dark Knight’ are Batman/ Bruce Wayne (Christen Bale), Harvey Dent/ Two-face (Aaron Eckhart), Joker (Heath Ledger), Rachel Dawes (Maggie Gyllenhaal) and Commissioner Gordon (Gary Oldman). The scenes which will be investigated are Wayne’s party, the SWAT car chase and Jokers interrogation.
There is no method or path to the jokers destruction. the joker does bad stuff just because. the joker sees every thing as a cruel joke. he doesn 't have anyone close to him so he has no weakness. he does what ever amuses him.
I have chosen Batman as the superhero I have conducted my research on. Batman is of course a fictional superhero owned by DC Comics. He first appeared in a detective comic in the May of 1939, written by Bill Finger. He was first known as The Bat-Man and later, the Dark Knight and world’s greatest detective. Batman is the secret identity of Bruce Wayne, who lives in Gotham, who is a billionaire philanthropist and industrialist.
Before watching this film, I researched for reviews and found several of them interesting. Altogether many thought the Netflix film was a brilliant idea; however, they also felt as if the movie had a lack of distinct villain and style. Though the film was thought to be a good idea, many felt as if the movie lacked a distinct villain. Usually, a distinct villain shows a “distinct in some way from other, whether it be some action in the moment that we meet them, that marks them out as different(The Villain Checklist: Distinct 2017).”
One thing I can say is that I may have not walked in the theatre as a fan, but I definitely came out as one. I went to see the film for one reason and one reason alone; it was the first stand-alone female superhero movie. That alone was intriguing enough, but in addition to that, the fact it was directed by a female director (first time for a studio superhero movie!) was another reason to watch it. Through this film, these talented and capable women had entered the no man’s land (pun intended) and much like Diana in the movie, they came out victorious.
