Lennie V. Curly: An Inciting Incident
Cedar Rapids v. Garrett F. Garret F., was a quadriplegic who was ventilator-dependent due to his spinal column being severed in a severe motorcycle accident when he was 4 years old. During the school day, he required a personal attendant within hearing distance to see to his health care needs. He required urinary bladder catheterization, suctioning of his tracheostomy, observation for respiratory distress, and other assistance. He attended regular classes in a typical school program and was successful academically.
Name of Case: LaChance vs. Erickson Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court Parties and their roles:. LaChance, director, Office of Personnel Management petitioner; Erickson et al Responded Relevant facts: Federal employees made false statements to agency investigators with respect to their misbehavior. The legal issue(s) raised: The legal issue raised was that the respondents, federal employees were charged by their agencies because each of them made false statements to the agency investigators with respect to their misconduct.
In the quiet town of Florida City a robbery took place at Seminole Bank. The robber wore a mask, carried a gun, and got away with $20,000 in cash. Witnesses were unable to identify the robber by his physical appearance because he was wearing a mask. However, the witnesses recognized his voice and identified the robber as Mr. Smallwood. In the case of Smallwood v. State, Mr. Smallwood was accused of armed robbery of Seminole Bank in Florida City, Florida.
Gideon V. Wainwright The case starts with the arrest of Clarence Earl Gideon who was charged with breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor. Gideon was a runaway, having left home around eighth grade he became a drifter. He wandered around from place to place and spent time in and out of prison of prison for many non-violent crimes. He eventually found some part time work at a pool club, the same club room he was accused of breaking into and robbing.
If Lennie didn’t get shot then Curly
The landmark law case is Board of Ed. of Hendrick Hudson Central School Dist. , Westchester City. v. Rowley (Oyez, n.d.) Furnace Woods School refused to provide deaf student Amy Rowley with a sign language interpreter.
From this quote it is understood that Curly didn’t have any care for Lennie, he would do anything to hurt Lennie because he was “cold”. If George didn’t kill Lennie himself it would have been a lot worse for him. Curley would have made him suffer and would have tortured him to death. George protected him from a harsh death by letting him go out by someone that loved him. George also
Throughout the story, Lennie constantly would find himself in trouble, and one reason for this may have been due to the fact that he would do or say things that seemed normal to him but were unusual to others during certain situations; Lennie’s condition caused him to struggle with social interactions and what he did was usually misinterpreted which was shown when Curley believed Lennie was laughing at him but he was not. Lennie’s inability to pick up social cues caused many misunderstandings; one of these misunderstandings occurred with Curley when Lennie was smiling thinking about his American dream which Curley interpreted as Lennie laughing at him. This altercation caused a domino effect that led to grim things consequently changing the pathway of the plot and the primary thing that sparked the fight in the first place was Lennie's distinct character traits and his lack of conversation
There is multiple conflicts throughout this book, each one involving a different character. Every chapter, there was a new conflict which was the plot of that chapter. From the beginning of the book, when they met the boss, to the end where Lennie was shot by George. One of the main conflicts of this book is when Curley thinks Lennie is laughing at him, but Lennie really isn’t. Since Curley is known as a boxer, he enjoys ruffling someone’s feathers; also, Curley likes to always talk about himself and be the center of attention all the time.
The point of physical violence has not been touched upon. In the midst of the rising action in the novel, Curley starts to beat Lennie because he was grinning at the thought of the ranch, but Curley thought that he was laughing at him. Lennie made a remark that he does not want to fight him. Consequently, Curley assaults Lennie, and he accepts it. It was only at George’s call for permission that Lennie crushed his hand.
The duty of any criminal prosecutor is to seek justice. A conviction is the end of justice being served prior to sentencing; however justice cannot be served if an innocent person is found guilty. Even though the prosecutor(s) are there to represent the public and has the duty to aggressively pursue offenders for violations of state and federal laws, they shall never lose sight or their own moral compass of their main purpose is to find the truth. In the pursuit of truth, the United States Supreme Court has developed or made rulings in reference to several principles of conduct which have to be followed by all prosecutors to assure that the accused person(s) are allowed the proper procedures and due process of the law granted by the 14th Amendment.
The Creature was insanely smart while Lennie wasn’t that smart and had a learning disability. This is shown by how each character committs their crime. The Creature was smart enough to target Elizabeth, Victor’s wife, on her wedding night, which was when Victor would be the most emotionally affected. Lennie’s crime was unintentional, he was simply trying to keep Curly’s wife quiet but accidentally broke her neck with his superhuman strength. Another difference was that the Creature had no one who accepted him while Lennie had George who did.
Curley was violent towards everyone because he wanted to feel bigger than everyone and so he would pick fights. Lennie was violent because he didn’t know his own strength and didn’t mean to hurt anyone.
Margaret Fuller fights for equality in her essay The Great Lawsuit. She discusses the idea that women are equal in every way to men and deserve the rights that men get just by being born male. Fuller’s argument shares a lot of similarities with Emerson’s idea of self-reliance. She discusses the idea of one universal order, and the notion of leaving the past in the past so as to move forward, although Fuller does share some ideas with Emerson, her essay held a different meaning of self-reliance for women than it did for men. Margaret Fuller adopts Emerson’s idea of one universal order, and claims that “if the woman apparelled in flesh, to one master only are they accountable.
(pg. 22). Since Lennie is mentally challenged and can’t think fast enough, he relies on George to tell him what to do. Curley had turned on Lennie by punching him; and protect himself, Lennie had grabbed Curley’s hand and crushed with his own hand. Lennie felt bad for what he did so George
More about Lennie V. Curly: An Inciting Incident
Cedar Rapids V. Garrett F. Case Study
241 Words | 1 PagesCase: Lachance Vs Erickson
184 Words | 1 PagesThe Case Of Smallwood V. State
406 Words | 2 PagesGideon Vs Wainwright Case Study
921 Words | 4 PagesExamples Of Foreshadowing In Of Mice And Men
173 Words | 1 PagesThe Landmark Law Case Of Amy V. Rowley
522 Words | 3 PagesWas George's Decision To Kill Lennie Justified
289 Words | 2 PagesHow Does Lennie Small Create A Mental Condition In Of Mice And Men
537 Words | 3 PagesHow Does Steinbeck Present The Conflict In Of Mice And Men
211 Words | 1 PagesOf Mice And Men Lennie To Blame Analysis
731 Words | 3 PagesBrady V. Maryland Argumentative Essay
390 Words | 2 PagesSimilarities Between Of Mice And Men And Frankenstein
508 Words | 3 PagesMotifs In Of Mice And Men
404 Words | 2 PagesAnalysis Of Margaret Fuller's Essay: The Great Lawsuit
695 Words | 3 PagesFriendship In Of Mice And Men
715 Words | 3 Pages