ipl-logo

Liberals Vs Radicals

1624 Words7 Pages

The liberals were a group of people who wanted to give the power to the government or elected officials and they were made up of middle class people. The radicals were people who wanted to make their government a total democracy. They also wanted their government to practice liberty, equality, and equality brotherhood. Both the liberals and the radicals were living in the same nation and they both wanted some sort of reform for their government. Since they wanted a change they would of agreed on nationalism. Nationalism is where you believe in your country or nationality instead of a king or queen. When a nation gets its own independent government its known as a nation-state. If they went to nationalism it would maybe allow all three political …show more content…

Most of the people took this information and didn't complain about it but the liberals did not like the result. The liberals wanted to give the power to the elected officials but when Louis-Napoleon started to rule France, he made it so that they had a self-government. He promoted public works. The reason Louis-Napoleon became emperor was because of something called the Third Republic. This consisted of a Paris mob overturning the monarchy and creating a republic. This new republic didn't last very long. Some people wanted social and economic changes but other people wanted only political changes. This caused the sides to fight which resulted in having a basic Constitution created. The constitution said that they needed a strong president to be elected and was to be elected by the people. That strong president was Louis-Napoleon. The French people were a little worried about how good this new president would be. They also didn't know how long he would rule or how fair he would be. Since the liberals believed in the elected officials ruling everything they were pretty upset when Louis-Napoleon came in and changed it so the people had more control. That's not how they wanted it nor how they liked it. Naturally when someone comes in and changes everything to things that you don't like, you aren't going to be the most supportive about this new idea. That's how the people felt. …show more content…

The only problem was that the czars didn't want to free the serfs because that would anger the people who owned land and the czars needed their support in order to stay in power. Czar Nicholas I decided he wanted to take over some of the ottoman empire but Russia's supplies weren't good enough for the countries troops which resulted in them losing the war against the forces of Great Britain, the Ottoman Empire, France, and Sardinia. Alexander II is Czar Nicholas's son and after that war he decided to make many reforms to Russia. Alexander and his helpers thought that these reforms would help him in the battle with Western Europe so that he could gain world power. The first reform Alexander had was freeing the serfs. Serfs were people who had to work on their Lords land. The problem with abolishing serfdom was that the poor communities ended up getting half of the farmland in the country instead of the individual poor people. Also the nobles or higher class people got the other half of the land but the government gave money to the nobles for their land while the poor peasant communities had 49 years to pay the government back for the land that they received. This wasn't fair because the nobles were getting paid for receiving land only because they were rich and high class while the poor people and communities we're

Show More
Related
497 Words | 2 Pages

Making no reason for France to dislike America. Thomas Jefferson has great respect for France and made a clear choice that he would rather have France as an ally than

Read More
773 Words | 4 Pages

When he was King of France he called the Estates general into session in a new effort to raise taxes, and France staggered on the verge of bankruptcy. Louis not only left France in debt but oppressed & manipulated the people with his power. The Estate General convened in 1789, third estate representatives broke loose and declared themselves the National assembly. They drew up the declaration of the right of man and citizen (riots arose and ideas of the Declaration spread), and these actions launched the french revolution. More and more riots became violent as heads of leaders appeared on sticks waved in the air, and the people wanted a new leader whose rule would benefit them as a whole, rather than drag the nation down for their own benefit.

Read More
645 Words | 3 Pages

France was very different before Napoleon came along. Before Napoleon France was controlled by an absolute monarchy. France was also under the old regime which was a system that existed in most of Europe at that time. Also all laws were created by the Legislative assembly. Based upon historical documents and his own words Napoleon Bonaparte had a negative impact on France.

Read More
644 Words | 3 Pages

At the time, it seemed like a decent idea to many of the French people. They longed for another strong emperor in their corner, once again their hope remained that he would bring with him peace to France. As you can imagine, the liberals would not have been happy with the quick decision making done by Emperor Napoleon III. Both liberals and radicals had spent the time fighting for a say in their government, but the way that Napoleon III declared himself Emperor angered them. The liberals wanted to give more power to the elected parliaments; although, Louis-Napoleon won the presidential election, he abused his power by taking over as Emperor.

Read More
726 Words | 3 Pages

In 1789, in response to the Tennis Court Oath, he signed the Constitution which expressly shared political authority with the National Assembly. In making this agreement, Louis clearly and publicly demonstrated that he understood and agreed that the authority of France was shared by its people (Brisbane Girls Grammar School Humanities Department, 2018). The defence will likely argue that Louis had come to believe in a political system where power was shared and where he was a monarch supported by the Constitution. The evidence available to us negates this argument.

Read More
1014 Words | 5 Pages

Alexander II’s greatest reform was the emancipation of the serfs. 90% of the Russian population at the time lived in serfdom, and as Russia began to become more and more modern, it was clear that the benefits outweigh the costs of freeing the serfs. Alexander II’s greatest aim was to modernize Russia. He would do this through giving more power to the people, Urbanizing and industrializing Russia, and to prevent uprising in the country. He was mostly successful in this goal, but he was never able to fully achieve it.

Read More
1244 Words | 5 Pages

The French, not at all like the Haitian slaves, were under a legislature as nationals and were trying to overthrow their current government. In doing so, they wanted to create a new government where they had rights that could settle their social needs as well as repair the damages caused by the war and decrease France’s debt. France was going through an internal battle because for 175 years the estates general wasn’t in session and when it was in session in 1789, King Louis XVI asked for more money but locked out the third estate. The third estate had no voice, rights and were just poor peasants suffering from having to pay 40% tax. Louis XVI was the king of France and thusly was considered in charge of its monetary emergency and the disparity of the French society.

Read More
1030 Words | 5 Pages

Napoleonic Rule The late 1700’s was a time of great discontent in France. The people of France revolted against their government in an attempt to gain power in political decision making. In this time, France experienced many forms of governments as the people fought for change. It was during the 1790’s that Napoleon Bonaparte became known to the people as a strong military leader.

Read More
819 Words | 4 Pages

The French economy during this time was very bad and the people were not paying much attention to government authority. The war was not entirely over and all of France was not yet liberated but de Gaulle still Pushed to restore the authority of the central government. As restoration took place social grievances became the main concern. The French people wanted to concentrate on problems caused by the war such as industry, agriculture, communication and transportation. However, economics was not de Gaulle s main concern, he was more focused on establishing France as a great power.

Read More
1440 Words | 6 Pages

Alexander III reforms had many consequences on Russia. The only reason his reforms did not work was because he had lost control of the government. Alexander's first reform was a decree of freeing the serfs in 1861, however, it only went halfway. Pheasant communities received about half the farm land in the country and nobles kept the other half. Pheasants are farmers and nobles are people where the government pays for there

Read More
924 Words | 4 Pages

According to an online dictionary nationalism is “a feeling that people have of being loyal to and proud of their country often with the belief that it is better and more important than other countries.” Although this is true, it can be believed that nationalism is a little bit more than that. Nationalism is a common bond that holds people to form a nation. It’s the small things that can be unnoticed. Just look at your high school, sports bring one group of people together and sometimes the library can bring another. Within a country on the other hand, it is just a little bit more than a sports team that brings a group of individuals together.

Read More
1350 Words | 6 Pages

King Louis XVI, who was the ruler at the time, was a main contributor to these problems that led France to its downfall. The country had a massive lack of resources and food, which led King Louis XVI to borrow more money than he could afford, thus putting the country in immense debt. Despite the very visible crisis overthrowing the country, the king was incapable of accepting his mistakes and refused to change his ways. He maintained the unjust voting system, known as the Estates-General, and worsened the taxing system in order to pay off his debts. The people, especially those of the Third Estate, were clearly angry and dissatisfied with the state of the country, which led them seek out a movement for what was right.

Read More
712 Words | 3 Pages

These groups never worked together well, which caused disputed within the revaloutionary actions. Liberals wanted to limit church influence and state power. They wanted wanted a republic government, a government without monarchy and economic freedom and civil liberties. Nationalists wanted national unity based on a common language, culture, religion and shared history. Radicals can be divided into two groups, Democrats and Socialists.

Read More
1518 Words | 7 Pages

A nation stems from a pre-existing history. It does not require that all the members be alike but they must have a bond of solidarity to the other members of the nation. Nationalism is a movement for the attainment and maintenance of unity, identity and autonomy of a population that its members consider a nation. Nations are a product of modernity but it is likely to find ethnic elements that exist in these nations.

Read More
1399 Words | 6 Pages

There are many different approaches to development in which countries over the years adopted to further develop and grow their economy. Some countries adopted the approach of import substitution in which they try to decrease their dependency on other nations and protect and foster domestic small companies. The disadvantage for an import substitution based industry, ISI, is although it achieves growth it does so through a greater period of time. On the other hand, growth and development from export oriented industries, EOI, has greater results and is so much faster than import substituting industries. Examples of countries that adopted import based industries are countries of Latin America while countries that adopted Export oriented Industries are countries of East Asia.

Read More

More about Liberals Vs Radicals

Related Topics

Open Document