ipl-logo

Life Without Parole For Juveniles Essay

622 Words3 Pages

In today’s society, juveniles can and do commit violent crimes. As a result, many are tried as adults and, if convicted, are sent to adult prison and sentenced to juvenile life without parole. Life without parole means that a young person is locked up for life without a second chance. Although some may argue that juveniles, who have committed violent crimes, deserve juvenile life without parole sentence, in reality, juvenile offenders should not be sentenced to life without parole because juveniles are mentally and emotionally immature, the victims of their own environment, and can be rehabilitated. Juveniles are not ready for life sentence without parole because of their mental and emotional immaturity. According to Paul Thompson’s research on the teenage brain, the frontal lobes “are vastly immature throughout the teenage years” (7). The immaturity of the brain makes it extremely difficult for juveniles to control their impulses. As a result, juveniles often act out their impulses without weighing the consequences …show more content…

Back to Paul Thompson’s research on the teenage brain, he claims that “the parts of the frontal lobes that inhibit reckless actions restructure themselves with startling speed in the teen years” (10). As their brains develop, juveniles are capable of changing their previously immature behavior. Rehabilitation is an opportunity for juveniles to demonstrate that they can change and become productive people for society. In addition, the former juvenile judge Gail Garinger show her support for rehabilitation by stating that “the same malleability that makes them vulnerable to peer pressure also makes them promising candidates for rehabilitation” (9). In other words, if juveniles are taught to become criminals, then they can also be rehabilitated to become good people. In order to allow such transformation to occur, juveniles should not be given life sentence without

Show More
Related
927 Words | 4 Pages

In the documentary “When Kids Get Life” by Ofra Bikel we see five men who were sentenced to life in prison for committing crimes in their teens. We hear the stories of how it happened, why it happened, and what life is like for them today. This documentary sheds light on the battle that juveniles face when they commit crimes and the judicial system. This documentary relates heavily in the material we learn because although it is about teenagers who receive life in prison, the judicial system plays a key role.

Read More
1302 Words | 6 Pages

Juvenile brains are much more likely to submit to peer-pressure and to engage in rash decision making (“Juvenile Justice & the Adolescent Brain”). The Massachusetts General

Read More
983 Words | 4 Pages

In his article, “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” Thompson exposes the shocking discovery that teens during puberty, experience a massive loss of brain tissue which are only in the areas of controlling impulses, risk-taking, and self-control. Thus, Thompson explains that due to these losses, teens and juveniles are vastly immature and underdeveloped when handling their thoughts and desires. Despite the fact that he officially discovered a biological difference, nevertheless Thompson shares his opinion about juveniles, “Even though normal teens [and juveniles] are experiencing a wildfire of tissue loss in their brains, that does not remove their accountability” (10). What Thompson is really saying here is that although teens are biologically different and immature, it should not be an “exit ticket” for a crime they have committed. In addition, not all teens are equal, as some have proven to use their intelligence and skills to carefully plan a murder over others who have unintentionally done so mistakenly.

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

There are certain instances of juveniles being tried as adults and sometimes ending up getting a life sentence without a chance of parole. I find that pretty harsh because there have been some cases where the juvenile meant no harm, they were either confused or brought along by gang members and they end up being charged along with the gang members for just being with them when a crime goes down. I believe that juveniles do not deserve to be given a life sentence because for one they are still maturing, they can learn from their mistakes and make amends, we still have to combat crimes like intended murder committed by a juvenile with extreme punishments especially if they are well over the age of 16. In the article published by the New York Times on March 14, 2012 “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences”, Garinger discusses that juveniles deserve a second chance since their brains are still developing.

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

The article “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences” argues that children in prison need to be given a chance to mature and be rehabilitated (Garinger 9). Because these killers likely committed these crimes on impulse, they would often realize after the fact that they were wrong to do such an action. Therefore, when they are released, they will be more careful and think about their actions before committing. If they are given a life sentence, they will never be given this chance to fix their life. Older people who commit murders are less likely to learn from their mistakes since they put more thought into the killing than adolescents

Read More
805 Words | 4 Pages

To better understand both sides of trying juveniles as adults, data on of trying juveniles as adults will be looked at. In doing this, evidence for why trying juveniles as adults is harmful will become clearer. The data will show that alternate programs such as community based program geared towards restorative justice and programs such as diversion will be most beneficial in helping juveniles learn social skill and learn the effect their behavior has on the community and the victim. Bringing both the juvenile and the community together with have a lasting effect and has been shown to reduce recidivism rate. Literature review Researchers look at the trying juveniles as adult in one of two ways, they look at juvenile delinquency as learned through peers, the second way they look at it is trying juveniles as adults is through a critical lens where the researchers believe that policy makers and judges benefit by keeping minority juveniles in detention centers or prison.

Read More
1414 Words | 6 Pages

Many criminals face many different leading factors that push them to murder someone, yet still receive a form of punishment. Juveniles however, may face these same circumstances yet not share the same treatment. If juveniles have special treatment due to their age, it does not seem fair nor serve equal justice, allowing juveniles to believe they'll have more leniency in the court of law and their sentences. However, despite having knowledge of the severity of their crimes and special treatment given due to age

Read More
624 Words | 3 Pages

For example, if a twelve-year-old kid is accused as an adult of an executing of another kid, at that point he will be condemned to serve his sentence in an adult jail. Recent research, “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains,” Paul Thompson, argues that a loss of brain tissues occurs during teenage years in which adolescents’ brains aren’t fully developed. The study reinforces the argument confirming that the adolescent brain isn’t fully developed, and the teenage brain is undergoing dramatic changes in ways that affect teen’s ability to weight the consequences for their decisions which would delay long enough to make teens unaware of their actions which would lead to serious consequences (Thompson 45). The following evidence suggests teens don’t see the barriers and limitations the way adults do. Bringing a fresh perspective to old problems and challenging limits is the essence of the teenage mind.

Read More
649 Words | 3 Pages

In the article, “Teens brains may not be as hard-wired for crime as previously thought” written by NewsRx Health, the quote represents the idea they have behind the teenage brain and what they believe the teenage brain is capable of doing to teens. Yes teenagers are different from adults but that doesn't defy that the brain is responsible for the

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

The article, “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains.” reveals that, “These frontal lobes, which inhibit our violent passions, rash actions, and regulate our emotions, are vastly immature throughout the teenage years” (Thompson). This demonstrates that in terms of cognitive development, all teenagers are far from adulthood. It also demonstrates that teenagers need all of the help they can get to guide their development onto the right path and away from the impulsive and erratic behavior. The article, “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences.” also reveals that, “The rationale for these earlier decisions is simple and equally applicable to the cases to ber heard: Young people are biologically different from adults” (Garinger).

Read More
1392 Words | 6 Pages

When teen felons choose to act without thinking, they are putting other people’s lives at risk. They need to be charged as adults because the victims of the crimes will not be given the justice they deserve when they have to worry about that criminal harming them again. Although some people think that sending a juvenile through adult court gives them no hope, they should have given this a little thought before committing the crime. Teens need to think about the consequences and how their actions affect others before they act. When choosing between putting a violent adolescent in prison and taking the chance of letting them commit that crime again, it is most suitable to let the teen be tried as an adult and to place them in prison.

Read More
849 Words | 4 Pages

There are differences between a juvenile court and criminal court in the United States. The focus of the juvenile justice system is on rehabilitation, in hope of deterring the minor away from a life of crime so they will not commit a crime again as an adult. In contrast, the criminal justice system focuses on the punishment and often bases the sentencing outcome on the criminal history of the youth. In a study conducted, Butler (2011) showed that the participants’ experience with adult jails and prisons show that those facilities may instill fear but are otherwise emotionally—and often physically—dangerous for youth. Many of the adult prisoners, who were minors when they enter the adult institution, felt they were forced to “grow

Read More
431 Words | 2 Pages

If an “undeveloped brain” was the case then teens would kill at roughly the same rates all over the world, which is not. Some of these teens think they can get away with some of these crimes which leads to commit more. In Jennifer's article she explains one of her case with a serial killer. His parents will fix everything whenever he got in trouble. After series of other

Read More
1062 Words | 5 Pages

It’s time take action There have been a lot of studies and researches to make a statement. The statement is to clarify if we should treat juveniles as adults or if we should not. This is something that teens can't stand up to. If we treat them as if they were adults, we can be making a big mistake because we are taking their future away from them. Instead of that we can help them to become better persons and to become a good member of society.

Read More
760 Words | 4 Pages

Can you imagine waking up behind closed walls and bars? Waking up to see your inmate who is a 45-year-old bank robber and you are a 14-year-old minor who made a big mistake. This is why minors who have committed crimes should not be treated the same as adults. Some reasons are because the consequences given to minors in adult court would impact a minor’s life in a negative way. If a minor is tried through a juvenile court, they have a greater chance of rehabilitation.

Read More

More about Life Without Parole For Juveniles Essay

Open Document