ipl-logo

Lifers As Teenagers

709 Words3 Pages

After reading the passages I think that if you do the crime, you should do the time. I think that juvenile restriction need to go further. I understand that some teens do the wrong thing and need a second chance, but sometimes they need to learn the hard way no matter the age. I think that if you kill someone, the hand you killed them with should be cut off. The hand you stole with should be cut off after the 3rd offense if its law breaking towards others. I think being sent to jail for life is nothing. If you 're in jail you still free in away, because you still have your life, but someone lost theirs due to someone else 's actions. I think locking up teens for life is not unconstitutional, especially for murder. I think if they …show more content…

I think sending a teen or adult to prison for life is not cruel or unusual for a punishment. I think that if they don 't go to jail, they will never learn. I think what 's cruel and unusual is them killing someone else. I think letting a killer walk free is like stabbing yourself in the back. This is why I disagree with Yee 's bill. This reminds me of the Lifers as teenagers article. The Lifers as Teenagers Article tells of how Ashley Jones killed her grandfather and aunt with her boyfriend. I think this was cruel and unusual. I think if she would get out she would finish the job by killing her grandmother. I think this was first degree murder and it should not go unpunished. Her grandmother wants her to get a second chance, I think she wants this because she is lonely and wants to see her granddaughter or she had a hand in the murder case. The grandmother is 88 years old, she didn 't scare of dying so she 's ok if a cool blooded kill is free. I think that we should protect ourselves and keep the killers behind bars. This remind me of the case against a 11 year old boy who shot and killed a 3 year boy. In the case of this 11 year old boy I think he should not be released from jail. He “accidentally shooting a 3-year-old boy,” I think even if it was an accident, he was going to kill someone else if they

Show More
Related
462 Words | 2 Pages

The punishment is just. Rights belive to be violated 8th amendment 14th amendment Rules: “567 U.S. ___ (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that mandatory sentences of life without the possibility of parole are unconstitutional for juvenile offenders.[2][3] The ruling extended beyond the Graham v. Florida (2010) case, which had ruled juvenile life without parole sentences unconstitutional for crimes excluding murder”. Analysis: Both sides are in disagreement over whether or not the sentence violates the defendant 8th amendment.

Read More
733 Words | 3 Pages

I'm not for killing people because we're (the government/prisons) killing people to show that killing isn't right and that makes zero sense but it should be somewhat fair make his life hell, or something he shouldn't get just life in prison he should have to work hard and want to get

Read More
258 Words | 2 Pages

Not only was this murder in a different time and place, but upon the investigation of the murder she would have been released of her previous murder charges and tried again for the

Read More
737 Words | 3 Pages

Would you believe that the mastermind of three murders could be out of jail in just eight years? Do you think it is fair that the other person involved with the murders was sentenced to life in jail and will only be eligible for parole after serving 25 years? Would it change your mind after knowing that the mastermind is just an 12-year-old? Jasmine Richardson was the 13 year old behind this terrible murder. Most wouldn’t believe someone that young could come up and go through with something that terrible.

Read More
1284 Words | 6 Pages

Shirley Crook was an innocent woman who was living a normal life happily married, with children when her life was instantly taken away from her in a painful way. All because of a teenager who was trying to see if he could murder someone without getting caught or punished for it. The death penalty should be given to anyone at any age who committed murder with the intention or plan to do it. There are different circumstances in each case and with these there should be no mercy given to this boy. The male brain isn’t fully developed until the age of 25 years, but by the age of 17, it should be able to think wisely and function on its own.

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

People argue that some juveniles are “too young and they don’t understand” but either way, they still broke the law and should be fairly punished. A fact stating “There are approximately 6,000 juveniles in adult jails and prisons in the United States” shows that people who have broken the law with felonies have been confined by law, no matter the age. People need to learn before they act in a similar manner, again. A similar case is a boy named Craig Price from Rhode Island who had committed multiple felonies, such as four murders and was charged as a minor, meaning he was arrested around age 16 and would get out and have his criminal record sealed at age 21. Because of this, a law was changed so that juveniles could be tried as adults with serious crimes.

Read More
926 Words | 4 Pages

I believe that each crime or murder should be looked at independently. That then mere fact that a person is under eighteen should not exclude them from the potential of a death sentence. Each crime should to be examined for premeditation and the heinousness of the

Read More
519 Words | 3 Pages

There are many arguments to be made to abolish life in prison. But what if a juvenile murders a dozen people. Will someone say that the kid does not deserve life in prison? The type of crime they commit will also have a big role in their sentencing. Life in prison should be maintained for the murderers out in the world.

Read More
623 Words | 3 Pages

I do understand that killing someone is not the answer to the problem, but at that point, these individuals did not what is right or wrong. So being that said giving them life punishment with parole would be wrong because the problem was not in the individual, but the up bring and the environment these kids grew up

Read More
1528 Words | 7 Pages

Crimes are happening around us whether we pay attention to them or not. Those crimes as dangerous as murder are committed by all ages but should younger criminal in their juvenile age received the same punishment as older criminals. On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that juveniles committed murder could not be sentenced to life in prison because it violates the Eighth Amendment.(On-Demand Writing Assignment Juvenile Justice) Advocates on the concurring side believes that mandatory life in prison is wrong and should be abolish. However, the dissenting side believe that keeping the there should be a life in prison punishment for juvenile who commit heinous crime regardless of their age.

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

In the article “On Punishment and Teen Killers” published by the Juvenile Justice Information Exchange on Aug 2,2011 the author, Jennifer Jenkins, points out how teen killers should be tried as adults for crimes committed at an adult level. Jenkins states that “... I understand how hard it is to accept the reality that a 16 or 17 year old is capable of forming such requisite criminal intent.” If a the teen intended to kill someone then they should be locked up, but if that was not the intention then they should get the help necessary instead of being locked

Read More
508 Words | 3 Pages

Killing another seems very unjustifiable, which might be the case but when someone takes another 's life and sent to prison, death row or capital punishment is needed to put that person were they belong. People like that deserve to die because of their mistake of killing another and it deters other people to not kill others, showing them what would happen. In the case of Capital Punishment, Hunting for Sport, or George and Lennie, killing is a justifiable act. In the case of capital punishment killing is justified and needs to be done. For example, “Some crimes are so inherently evil they demand strict penalties up to and including death”(McClatchy).

Read More
1392 Words | 6 Pages

When teen felons choose to act without thinking, they are putting other people’s lives at risk. They need to be charged as adults because the victims of the crimes will not be given the justice they deserve when they have to worry about that criminal harming them again. Although some people think that sending a juvenile through adult court gives them no hope, they should have given this a little thought before committing the crime. Teens need to think about the consequences and how their actions affect others before they act. When choosing between putting a violent adolescent in prison and taking the chance of letting them commit that crime again, it is most suitable to let the teen be tried as an adult and to place them in prison.

Read More
317 Words | 2 Pages

Although she didn’t directly kill him, she did urge her husband to do so and supported him as opposed to stopping him from committing a felony like this. A lot of the time, you hear people saying that something won’t

Read More
729 Words | 3 Pages

Juveniles Justice Juveniles who are criminals being sentenced to life without parole can be shocking to some people. I believe if a juvenile is able to commit a crime, then they are able to do the time. The article “Startling finds on Teenage Brains” talks about how the brain can be different from the time you are teens to the time you are an adult. After, considering both sides on juvenile justice it is clear that juveniles should face life without parole because they did the crime so they can do the time. Also I believe the juvenile’s age should not influence the sentence and the punishment give.

Read More

More about Lifers As Teenagers

Related Topics

Open Document