ipl-logo

Loyalty In The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar

941 Words4 Pages

A human life is a precious thing. Every person is only allowed one so they must value it. There comes a time where the question of is it okay to ever take a human life. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, is a ominus play that recounts the story of Julius Caesar. In the play Caesar is noble Roman who is becoming too powerful and that has gathered concerns from a group of Roman senators. The senators conspire to take Caesar’s life, but need the cooperation of a respected senator named Marcus Brutus. Brutus is a trusted friend to Caesar and is against the plot. Eventually, Brutus turns on Caesar and partakes in his murder. Caesar’s supporters, Antony and Octavius, start a civil war to avenge his death. The play ends will Brutus committing suicide. To take a life is a very controversial topic. However, taking a human life is only ever justified under certain circumstances. *The taking of a human life is justified when it is to show the loyalty to one’s country. Loyalty to one’s country can be a valued quality that citizens look for in their nation’s leaders. This allows them to overlook some questionable actions that are performed by leaders. The senators of Rome in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar sense that they need to take action against the rising Julius Caesar. The conspirators see him as a ruthless ruler who will change …show more content…

Those circumstances could be to show loyalty to one’s country, for the good of society, and when it benefits only the person performed the action. Loyalty to one’s country can be used to prove to citizens that leaders are still with them. Taking a life for the good of society is justified to protect the citizens. When it is beneficial to only the person, it allows them to get out of sticky situations. Even if taking a human life is justifiable, a life is still a precious thing and must always be

Show More
Related
395 Words | 2 Pages

In short story, “Killings”, Richard Strout kills Frank Fowler because Frank started talking to his ex-wife. Richard walked in and shot Frank right in front of his kids and wife. Richard shot Frank twice in the chest and once in the face with a 9 mm. automatic gun. A justified killing means for a killing to be proven reasonable. So, saving someone from death would be a justified killing.

Read More
264 Words | 2 Pages

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is about the assassination of Julius Caesar. The conspirators against Caesar recruit Brutus, who had great influence over the people of Rome and was trusted by Caesar. With his help they attack Caesar in the senate. At his funeral Mark Antony, a friend of Caesar's, is aloud to speak and he is able to turn the people against the conspirators. This causes a Civil war between Rome and the conspirators.

Read More
774 Words | 4 Pages

Julius Caesar: a beloved man with a tragic and mysterious death to end his tale at the hands of people that he once considered close friends of his. In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar,” the audience gets to witness the conflicts that might have taken place behind closed doors, listening to the debates that took place between such as Mark Antony and Brutus. In the play, Antony tries to convince Brutus that Caesar deserves to be murdered. Near the end, Antony and Brutus both pay homage to Caesar at his funeral in front of the Roman civilians, with Antony delivering the most effective speech by fabricating a refined and potent speech that used rhetorical appeals to persuade the citizens of Rome. In the speech, Antony is trying to sway the crowd into agreeing with the motives for murdering Caesar by using logos to justify his actions.

Read More
2312 Words | 10 Pages

“Some people are willing to betray years of friendship just to get a little bit of the spotlight” (Conrad). Julius Caesar and Brutus were considered good friends. LeBron James was basically made into a superstar from the Cleveland Cavaliers. The relationship between the two groups will be explained in detail.

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

Abraham Lincoln once stated, “Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man’s character, give him power.” One important term in Lincoln’s statement is adversity, which means a case or situation of major or extended hardship or misfortune. Another significant term in Lincoln’s statement is character, which means the fundamental complex of attributes that determine a person's moral and ethical actions and reactions. Taken entirely, Abraham Lincoln suggests in his statement that having power is not always a good thing. Furthermore, Abraham Lincoln implies in his statement that power can make a kind and good person strong so that they can stand up for those who can not stand up for themselves but it can also make a dishonest person corrupt and greedy.

Read More
1841 Words | 8 Pages

In Islam it is essential that ending one's life or your own particular is a wrongdoing. In the Holy Book, God has plainly expressed, “whoever kills a man, it is as though...” (Holy Qur’an 5:32). Islam teaches reconciliation. It doesn't allow any incline toward not to be conveyed in such a route, to the point that a life is taken away.

Read More
607 Words | 3 Pages

Caesar is brought to the senate where he eventually is stabbed by the conspirators, his friends, his allies, and the people he trusted. The conspirators didn’t think of the reproductions of their actions and they have now started a war. They lose the battle against Mark Antony, some conspirators commit suicide, and some are executed. Shakespeare wanted us to develop sympathy for Julius Caesar through the betrayal of his friends, his overthrow of power, and the ultimate death of his once friends.

Read More
1099 Words | 5 Pages

Proving a Tragic Hero A character who makes a judgement or error that inevitably leads to his or her own destruction, defines a tragic hero, according to Aristotle. In William Shakespeare’s writings, one character generally identifies as a tragic hero. Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, comes from the true events that took place in Rome during the time that Caesar rose and gained power as dictator. After Pompey’s death in Egypt; caused by each of their power-hungry desires, Caesar declared himself dictator of Rome.

Read More
737 Words | 3 Pages

In public, Caesar was the leader Rome had always wished for, a strong, valliant man that would let nothing in his way. Consequently, Caesar had a more vulnerable side to him where the reader would be able to see glimpses of throughout the play. Still, Caesar allowed his public self image to take priority in which would eventually lead to his death. Speaking historically, the great Julius Caesar was a people’s leader with a deep hunger for power in which he would do anything to

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

A human life has always been the most valued and essential aspect of the public, also the culture and history as a unit. This is usually influenced by the law. If the culture disregards the life of others the most vulnerable are in danger anywhere from the elder to the disabled. A culture that is against assisted suicides sees life as valuable, which also treat the elderly, disabled, and ill equal to everyone else. If certain laws

Read More
1071 Words | 5 Pages

Julius Caesar, is a play based on the true events that occurred in Roman history. The play follows the fictional lives of Caesar and his people leading up to, and after his assassination. Several characters can be labeled as both villainous and heroic at different points in the play due to their actions, however, this does not apply to the character of Marcus Junius Brutus, who remains a hero through the entire play. Brutus is a hero for several reasons, The first reason Brutus is considered to be a hero is because he continuously stands up for what he believes in. Secondly, it is clear that Brutus is a hero because he kills himself as a sacrifice to the roman public.

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

The play begins with Julius Caesar returning from a victory over Pompey to a cheering crowd of Romans. He is an ambitious leader who wants Rome to prosper and looks out for his countrymen over himself, though he has his own, darker, flaws. This selflessness is explicitly demonstrated by him saying “What touches us shall be last served” (III.I.9) when he is told to deal with a letter because it most directly related to him. His goal is to further Rome and gain the approval of his people, which he does very well.

Read More
1129 Words | 5 Pages

In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, a tragedy, William Shakespeare creates facades for the historical figures he uses as characters. Although the audience knows the disguises for most characters, they have no choice but to watch them fail. The decline of powerful politicians makes this play a tragedy. In order to remain strong to the citizens of Rome and their enemies, Cassius, Caesar and Antony put up facades to mask their motives.

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

I submit that all human lives are equal in value and should be regarded as such. It follows then that human lives should be weighed equally when making the quantitative comparison between saving one person and more than one person. Since all lives are equal, it is obviously better to save the larger number of lives. Perhaps you have seen the Star Trek movie 'The Wrath of Khan. ' There is a pivotal moment when Spock says "Logic clearly dictates that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few", in which Kirk replies "or the one.

Read More
1177 Words | 5 Pages

Julius Caesar Essay Betrayal can be defined as breaking the bond of trust in any type of relationship, and deceiving others. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, betrayal can be seen throughout the play, done to and by many of the characters. Many of the reasons why betrayal is shown in the play are all for a similar reasons- Ambition / greed. The theme of Julius Caesar is that people betray others because of ambition and greed.

Read More

More about Loyalty In The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar

Related Topics

Open Document