Compare and Contrast Essay The Great Pyramids and the Ludovisi Battle Sarcophagus are two magnificent works of art from two different civilizations and eras one being from Europe and one being from the Mediterranean. The marble Ludovisi Battle Sarcophagus is a Roman sarcophagus that dates to about 250 AD and is housed in Rome, Italy. The Great Pyramids, on the other hand, are stone-built, ancient Egyptian pyramids that were constructed in Giza, Egypt, around 2600 BC. The Ludovisi Battle Sarcophagus is an example of Hellenistic art, which is characterized by its use of naturalistic form, dramatic poses, and emotional expressions. On the other hand, the Great Pyramids are an example of Ancient Egyptian art, which is known for its use of stylized form and symbolism. Ancient Egyptian art is also characterized by its use of flat, stylized figures with little regard for naturalistic form which can be seen in the pyramids. …show more content…
The sarcophagus is 3 meters in length and depicts a battle scene. The formal elements of the sarcophagus include the use of dramatic poses, expressive faces, and naturalistic form. The sarcophagus is a realistic depiction of a battle scene in Rome, with soldiers fighting and dying. The style of the sarcophagus is Hellenistic, which is a combination of Greek and Roman styles. As for the Great Pyramids, their purpose was to serve as tombs for pharaohs and their consorts. The pyramids are massive in size and were made to last forever, which can be seen to this day as they are still standing. The formal elements of the pyramids include their massive size, geometric shapes, and precise construction. The pyramids are not naturalistic but are stylized in the Ancient Egyptian tradition. The style of the pyramids is Ancient Egyptian, which is characterized by its use of stylized form, flat figures, and symbolic