To do this they both implemented numerous programs to reach the goal of relief, recovery, and reform. However, they also differed in many ways. While the New Deal’s focus was the economy, the Great Society’s focus was health and education and was more successful than the New Deal. When it came to unemployment rates, during Roosevelt’s presidency it was the entire economy, while for Johnson it was clustered around minorities. In addition Roosevelt did not support civil rights legislation, and Johnson supported and protected civil rights
The actions and words of Andrew Johnson were very contradictory. The cartoon states: "Treason is a crime and must be made odious, and traitors must be punished". He told the people of a reconstruction plan that was supposed to punish the confederate rebels. Johnson did the opposite by ordering many pardons The Northern Republicans in Congress were ostracized because he continually vetoed their attempts at reconstruction.
Johnson had been voted into office, right off the bat he wanted to stop the assault of poverty, though as previously in my last paragraph the Economy was fairly good, but there was still a shocking amount of poverty in the United States. President Johnson ran his campaign on the idea of a war against poverty and when he got into office the OEO , also known as the Office of Economic Opportunity, “created an array of new educational, employment, housing, and health-care programs”(Brinkley 699) This was done to help offer opportunities to those who were living below the poverty line, and even though it was helpful for a while the effects were impossible to sustain. In the attempts to end poverty the OEO spent three billion dollars. The program then came to a halt because the United States entrance into a war in Southeast Asia and that became a first priority(Brinkley 699).
President Johnson and President Reagan's visions of America were similar and different in many ways. President Johnson wants the Federal Government to be more involved solving problems of America compared to President Reagan, who wants less involvement of the Federal Government. Both Presidents want to make America as great as it can be, but they have their sights set on two different solutions. President Johnson wants to focus on making the quality of society better versus President Reagan, who wants to focus on economic fairness. These two Presidents are trying to accomplish the same goal to make America the best it can be, but it is being done with a Democratic and Republican point of view.
During the 1960’s when Lyndon B Johnson was president the Great Society was successful. One example to prove that the Great Society was successful is written in document C by Joseph A Califano Jr. and he states, “Great Society's food stamp program helps feed more than 20 million men,women, and children in more than 8 million households. Since it was launched in 1967, the school breakfast program has provided a daily breakfast to nearly 100 million schoolchildren.” This quote boldly illustrate how amazing the great society is by providing food for the poor. Another great example of how the great society was successful by Joseph A Califano Jr. states, “The Voting Rights Act of 1965. .
Although the Great Depression had torn apart the prosperity of the United States, hope soon enough resurfaced in the form of presidential candidate Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s promises of a “new deal”. However, Roosevelt’s attempts at economic and social reform met mixed results - although his efforts to mend the extreme personal debt of farms and banks (as well as the general population) did succeed (at least in part), his attempts to remedy the unemployment crisis and the growing national debt were failures, and in the case of national debt, he may have even made the problem worse. The origin of these failures is likely the methods Roosevelt used themselves - one effort to fix the economy surrounding farmers was even deemed unconstitutional,
President Lyndon Baines Johnson, John F. Kennedy’s former Vice President, had magnificent aspirations concerning the future welfare of the country. At the University of Michigan’s commencement speech, exactly six months after John F. Kennedy’s assassination in Texas, Johnson spoke of his vision of ‘The Great Society.’ The intent of this vision was to transform the state of the U.S. and build a better, tougher, stronger nation that would be a witness to its own substantial progress through its domestic programs. It would be a nation where the whole society was cared for; it would be a nation where segregation and racism ceased to exist; it would be a nation where all were welcomed to come. He understood the undertaking that awaited him in the
Roosevelt enacted The New Deal reforms and Johnson aspired to mold the country into The Great Society. Although they bear some minor similarities, the long-lasting effects of the New Deal and the Great
The Great Society which was a set of domestic political programs in the US created by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1964 had many goals, but the two most important goals of the reforms were to eliminate poverty and racial injustice. During his speech at the University of Michigan in May 1965, president Johnson first revealed the program in details. At that time, the society was racially divided. Only whites could vote which showed the injustice to black and native americans. The rich people were getting richer with all the advantages and the poor people were left with nothing.
The Great Society Program was good for so many reasons like the poverty for people has drooped down from 22.2% to 12.6%. Now say that Lyndon B. Johnson have not did this program; then, the poverty percent for people would go up past the years. He also had made this for families that are poor to have their kids have a head and have to start the same time as the kids in a rich family. Lyndon made the food stamp act of 1964. This act
While the Great Society had some ideas that led the United States in the direction of development in the far future, it failed to assist those affected by poverty and other problems experienced at the time. The Oakland repairment is one example of how the Great Society provided despair and disillusionment to those living in poverty. Overall, James Murray viewed the civil rights movements and the poverty reconstruction as a failure due to Lyndon Johnson's idealistic attempts at recovery rather than realistic attempts. On the other hand, Lyndon Johnson's ideological thoughts blended ideological ideas with progressive and pragmatic principles, allowing effective leadership and commitment. One of Johnson’s greatest contributions throughout his presidency was his dedication to improving the nation's medical standpoint.
Lyndon B. Johnson declared the war on poverty during a Union address in January 8th, 1964. This was in response to national poverty rates being around 19 percent at the time of his speech. Lyndon B. Johnson’s success in lowering poverty rates during the “war on poverty,” was due to legislations such as VISTA, Job Corps, Head Start, Medicaid, Medicare, and HUD. One major Legislation is VISTA.
Fifty years ago, President Lyndon Johnson declared war on poverty. Johnson’s administration proposed a set of initiatives to the congress and then was later implemented by his cabinet agencies. War on Poverty is laws that were put in place during Johnson’s State of the Union, which was addressed on January 8, 1964 to reduce poverty. Johnson’s exact words were “Our aim is not only to relieve the symptoms of poverty, but to cure it and above all to prevent it (Johnson, 1964). With Johnson’s efforts, there were 4 pieces to the legislation.
After the momentous accomplishment of the Civil Rights act and Voting Rights, the Great Society changed the direction of equality for all citizens. Multiple programs produced by the legislation did not last. After the War Lyndon Johnson faced one against communism in Vietnam, the immediate result was the policies that failed. One being the Economic opportunity as it lacked educational ability and backfired, because of this movement the democratic constituencies were fighting poverty. There were issues correlated with the increased dependency on the government that hurt poverty.
Abortion Abortion is one of the most controversial topics in 2016. Especially when you consider the different opinions our presidential candidates have. While there are many mixed opinions, a potential life is being taken away with abortion. There are options like birth control, safe sex, and adoption, but there are also cases of rape or health issues. While the focus is usually on the baby’s life, the effect on the woman’s life and parents looking to adopt should also be taken into consideration.