ipl-logo

Machiavelli And Christianity And Evil Essay

651 Words3 Pages

Why has Machiavelli name synonymous with evil? There are several reasons and all can be found in the book, The Prince, by Machiavelli. The Prince is an interpretation of how Machiavelli believes one should live their lives and accomplish their goals. One can achieve their answer to the question through the evaluation of Machiavelli on the religion of Christianity and Machiavelli on Classical Thought. Some often perceived Machiavelli’s teachings as evil, but Machiavelli thought otherwise.
Machiavelli begins the search for his answer with the evaluation of Christianity. In Machiavelli’s opinion, Christianity’s downfall is that it teaches people to not value the worldly things and themselves, but to place value in a divine order and a divine being that cannot help them in this world. To support his argument of abandoning Christian thought, Machiavelli refers to the successes of Alexander the VI. Machiavelli often praises Alexander the VI for using the platform of Christian pope to further his agenda while not truly acting by …show more content…

Machiavelli lived in a time dominated by Christian thinkers and his thought was outside the boundaries of their beliefs. Machiavelli teachings focused on how one could achieve worldly success and valuing the things of the earth without Christian thinking. To further support his argument, Machiavelli says “Our experience has been that those princes who have done great things have held food faith of little account”. The princes that he believed to have done great things are those such as Alexander the XI and Chiron the Centaur. Machiavelli’s teachings focused on worldly figures instead of religious figures. Machiavelli’s thinking troubled a tremendous amount of people and his challenge to the status quo was interpreted as evil. It was interpreted as evil because it was different from the status

Show More
Related
1824 Words | 8 Pages

In the story of "The Prince" written by Niccole Machiavelli takes place in the sixteenth century, around the time when Italy was not a unified country. Rather, it was more of a collection of city-states, each with its own court and ruler, all aiming to gain power over one another. On top of the commotion from the toggle war of power between the city states, Italy became a battleground for the French, the Spanish, the Germans, and as well as the Catholic Church under the Popes. At the time the Popes had so much power, that they were practically equal to a secular king during that time period. Prior of when Italy became a battle ground the major Italian city-state, the republic of Florence, had established ties as an alliance with the French.

Read More
910 Words | 4 Pages

President Obama echo a leadership of both Niccolo Machiavelli "The Qualities of the Prince" and Martin Luther King Jr. "Letter from Birmingham Jail". Machiavelli point of view to become a successful prince was that you must lead your people. He talks about how a prince should appear to his people for authority. There are different types of principles such as war and is it better to be loved or feared.

Read More
401 Words | 2 Pages

When comparing Machiavelli and Rousseau’s presentation on human nature, one can see that Machiavelli’s idea of human nature was completely opposite compared to Rousseau’s idea of human nature. Machiavelli was a realist, and had a rather negative view on human nature. He assumed that men by nature are evil, and are driven by their own selfish wants and needs. In a society where they are free, everything becomes unorganized and confusing. In Machiavelli’s, The Prince, he states that, “Men never do good except out of necessity, but when they have the freedom to choose and can do as they please, everything becomes confused and disorderly (182).”

Read More
875 Words | 4 Pages

" GoWyld. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Jan. 2016). Michael Ledeen wrote a book and talked a lot about the way Machiavelli talked and he says, "Machiavelli expands the earlier paradox: just as the quest for peace at any price invites war and, worse than war, defeat and domination, so good acts sometimes advance the triumph of evil, as there are circumstances when only doing evil ensures the victory of a good cause."

Read More
542 Words | 3 Pages

• Thomas used Aristotle’s view of natural law to justify the authority of the Roman Catholic Church in political as well as religious matters. For the purpose of explaining the fundamental reasons of law he used Aristotle’s philosophy and added the use of an eternal ruler. John Locke • John Locke had a distinct influence on the writers of the American Constitution by advocating for human rights and liberty through democracy. In saying so, he believed that the mass majority of ordinary people can be capable of giving consent to their governor/ruler as opposed to the Monarch government. However if the ruler did not comply with the needs of the people, Locke believed that the public had the justified right to rebel.

Read More
762 Words | 4 Pages

Machiavelli argues the perfect prince will be both feared and loved by his people, and if unable to be both he will make himself feared and not hated. Machiavelli believes it is much safer to be feared than to be loved because people are less likely to offend and stand up against strong characters, also people are less concerned in offending a prince who has made himself loved. Accordingly, Machiavelli believes generosity is harmful to your reputation and the choice between being generous or stingy, merciful or cruel, honest or deceitful, should only be important if it aids the prince in political power. All in all, Machiavelli believes the ruler must be a great deceiver and do what is essential to uphold power over the

Read More
252 Words | 2 Pages

Machiavelli was an Italian diplomat, and best known for writing "The Prince", that is handbook for unscrupulous politicians. He got education by educated himself in his father's library. He was also established as the Father of Modern History. "Machiavellianism" is a widely used, negative term, to characterize politicians often associated with deceit, ambicion, brutality and corruption. These were the kind of politicians Machiavelli described of his famous book The Prince.

Read More
954 Words | 4 Pages

One aspect of Machiavelli’s theory which significantly contributes to his reputation as the “philosopher of evil,” is his advice to the prince on keeping their word to the public. In chapter eighteen, Machiavelli states, “a wise ruler cannot, and should not, keep his word when doing so is to his disadvantage, and when the reasons that led him to promise to do so no longer apply” (pg. 37). To simplify, Machiavelli says princes are obligated to lie in certain circumstances. He also states that while it is unnecessary for the prince to have positive qualities, such as honesty, trustworthiness, sympathy, compassion, or be religious, it is essential for the prince to be viewed so by the public (pg. 37). While many people argue that Machiavelli’s legitimization of lying and deception in politics is immoral, I argue the opposite.

Read More
181 Words | 1 Pages

The word Machiavellian implies the negative meaning of a man’s intentions and mind. The word was derived from an Italian renaissance thinker Niccolo Machiavelli, a philosopher, historian and most notably a political thinker. He wrote one of the most influential books which shaped the game of politics and has a massive impact on contemporary politics, the book called the prince which is practically a manual on how to obtain and maintain the power by any means necessary. What makes the book distinguishable is that it was written during the 15th century Italian renaissance time in which during that time the western world was overshadowed by the ideal dogma of Christianity. Any ideas that contradict the church’s view will immediately be excluded

Read More
192 Words | 1 Pages

The Freedom of a Christian by Martin Luther and the Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli are quite distinct in their goals of development and human nature, even though both are in agreement on an individuals’ tendency to indulge in self-gain (McNally, 1967, 439). Machiavelli believes that fear last longer than generosity and that it is stronger and powerful. Moreover, he believes that love and generosity come and goes and is never forever. He asserts that fear never fades away. The author believes that it is acceptable for a prince to be considered generous but only to some extent.

Read More
523 Words | 3 Pages

Niccolo Machiavelli This summary discusses about two books of an author and philosopher whose called Niccolo Machiavelli. In his Book I, the lack of religion is well shown in Italy that caused Machiavelli be in a contradiction of the idea about the Roman Church. Machiavelli mentioned two significant reasons for his contradict.

Read More
1896 Words | 8 Pages

Plato and Machiavelli both influenced the modern concepts of political theory by outlining their conceptions of human nature, and prescribing how one should go about dealing with others within their communities, and how they should deal with themselves. Machiavelli helped to shape the modern outlook because he talks and makes decisions/suggestions based on real life and how things are. This differentiated him from other philosophers, like Plato, because he spoke and made references to things based on ideal/theoretical situations instead of how things were in his society. Machiavelli has accepted the flaws that come with human society because he sees that some people cannot change, and that some are to deep in their own demise/destruction, and

Read More
1034 Words | 5 Pages

Machiavelli has the most correct ideas on both controlling the people as a ruler and on being remembered as a great one. These two viewpoints had great influence during their time and for centuries to come, both with modern ideas and correct ideas even though they had a lot of contrast. Machiavelli’s The Prince may be thought of the more recognizable of the two in the present, but people in the present day have many of the same ideas that

Read More
1526 Words | 7 Pages

I. Machiavelli In his famous work the Prince Niccolo Machiavelli exposes what it takes to be a good prince and how only this good price and keep control over his state. There are many different qualities that make a man a good ruler but there are some that are more essential than others. In this work Machiavelli stresses the importance of being a warrior prince, a wise prince, and knowing how to navigate the duality of virtù and vices. Without these attributes there was no way that a prince could hold together their state and their people.

Read More
1134 Words | 5 Pages

John Webster, the great Elizabethan dramatist was little admired during his life time. The Elizabethans failed to appraise his genius as a dramatist and after his death he fell for nearly two hundred years into the lap of oblivion to be brought back into the limelight by the criticism of such distinguished critics as Lamb, Swinburne, Rupert Brooke, who popularised his works and establised his claim to be recognised as a great dramatist of Elizabethan age. But now the tide has turned in Webster 's favour and he is recognised today not as a dramatist who carried forward the revenge theme in drama but as a great poet, and above all, a great moralist, who held aloft the moral vision of life at a time when the dramatists of the age were piling horror and glorifying murder into a fine art. This tragedy THE DUCHESS OF MALFI, the revenge is further degraded and the moral motive of the dramatist come to the forefront. There are some influences of other Elizabethan authors.

Read More

More about Machiavelli And Christianity And Evil Essay

Related Topics

Open Document