ipl-logo

Magna Carta And Salian Franks: A Comparative Analysis

1179 Words5 Pages

In premodern societies law codes were placed into effect to ensure peace between different social classes as well as among the same social class. Laws in earlier societies paved the way for many of our laws today. A structured government can contribute to prevention of rebellion among classes and generates steady revenue for government officials through certain taxes or punishment monetary fines. Important questions are answered in pinpointing the reason for laws to be put into action in those societies. In addition, the underlying issue in the society at the time and what benefits were entitled to the enforcer of the laws will also be discussed. The Magna Carta, Seventeen Article Constitution, and the Code of the Salian Franks are three documents enforced by rulers for different reasons and few of the same. These three law codes will be analyzed, compared, and contrasted for their important historical contribution to the societies which enforced their respective laws.
In the year 1215, King John, an unpopular ruler was forced to sign the Magna Carta as a peace treaty among the England barons. The Magna Carta was an important document because for the first time in history, it limited the King’s power. It gave independence to the people of England and also acknowledged that the King is also subject to the law. King John …show more content…

One being that the seventeen articles of Constitution stressed the importance of moral behavior as opposed solely following a set of laws, as demonstrated in the Magna Carta and the Code of the Franks. “Good faith is the foundation of righteousness, and everything must be guided by good faith. The key to the success of the good and the failure of the bad can also be found in good faith. If the officials observe good faith with one another, everything can be accomplished. If they do not observe good faith, everything is bound to

Show More
Related
1430 Words | 6 Pages

The Magna Carta, signed in 1215, mainly secured liberties for England’s elite classes, but it has helped the fundamental principles of common law in constitutions around the world. The Magna Carta's influence on the constitution allowed specific rights from it be included in the US Constitution's Bill of Rights. An example of this would be the similarities between the Magna Carta's thirty ninth clause and the Bill of Rights seventh and fifth amendment. “No free man shall be seized or imprisoned … except by the lawful judgement of his equals or by the law of the land” (Magna Carta, clause 39).This clause refers to the guarantee that courts will

Read More
992 Words | 4 Pages

The laws were made to equalize society, establish justice and fairness, bring about the rule of righteousness, and protect the weak from the strong.   However, the rich and poor, men and women, and elites and commoners were treated differently under the law based on their social hierarchy and distinctions, which soon became normal and accepted in society. These laws also influenced the need for one, powerful leader. It used the political power to generate bonds between the people of different races and backgrounds.

Read More
449 Words | 2 Pages

In the early 1200’s, King John of England spent most of his time trying to expand his territory. In doing so, he outstretched his expenses, and forced his people to keep trying to pay impeccably high taxes he imposed on them. After his many military failures, the kings’ nobles forced John to write a document stating his powers as King for his people. This could be a problem because King John could have threatened people who didn’t agree to his terms with their family’s’ lives, or their social status as nobles. Then as recipients of the letter, his people might not expect too much out of it because the king can change the document as easily as he can create it.

Read More
716 Words | 3 Pages

England, however, had a different reaction to the developing changes. Instead of limiting the power of the people, the power of the king himself was restricted. King John was coerced into signing the Magna Carta, which established that everyone, even himself, was required to follow the laws. It also assured that the English Church was free, and everyone had the right to justice (D-5). This showed that England was receptive to the reforms that held the rights of the people in higher regards.

Read More
1258 Words | 6 Pages

One of the most influential codifications of law in ancient history, the text provides people with a concrete example of the expanding influence of centralized government on the personal and professional lives of the general population. It also gives people a clear sense of the ways ancient Babylonians invested godly authority in their worldly

Read More
870 Words | 4 Pages

The Magna Carta was a revolutionary document that, for the first time, declared that the king and government of England were required to abide by the laws they created. It was also declared that

Read More
1021 Words | 5 Pages

Laws are for the good of people for not doing a crime and getting punishment for doing a crime. One of the main laws was the feudal law. It was an agreement with a lord and his vassals. A vassal had to do military and political service while a lord had to give the vassal a grant of land. The decline of feudalism happened when vassals would team up with other vassals and override the power of the king.

Read More
1080 Words | 5 Pages

First, the Magna Carta is a legal document that was written in 1215. It was written to acknowledge the carelessness of the kings doing in England to abuse his power while watching the other English people suffer, and to enforce a set of rules that everyone, including himself, would have to follow. Dating back to about 1772 BCE the Amorite King Hammurabi issued a set of laws after conquering Mesopotamia, by the name of law codes of Hammurabi ( Hammurabi S2). It was to place boundaries and penalties on people due to their choice of action. Hammurabi did it in order to “cause justice to prevail in the land” and to “further the welfare of the people which supports that idea (Hammurabi S2).

Read More
505 Words | 3 Pages

Third, all subjects are ensured "due procedure of law," which implies that states can't pass discretionary or out of line laws. Fourth, all nationals are ensured "rise to insurance of the laws," which implies

Read More
635 Words | 3 Pages

" Four of its main points include: “No taxes could be levied without Parliament 's consent. No English subject could be imprisoned without cause--thus reinforcing the right of habeas corpus. No quartering of soldiers in citizens’ homes. No martial law may be used in peacetime.” This is similar to the English Bill of Rights (1688), which guaranteed free elections and rights for citizens accused of crime.

Read More
132 Words | 1 Pages

The Magna Carta, or ‘The Great Charter’, was a peace treaty drawn up by King John of England in the year 1215 to stop civil war by some rebel barons. Unfortunately, the treaty did not work as planned, however it did, for the first time, establish a thought that everyone, including the king, were subject to the law of the land. This document helped to create a new way of how the king treated his people. The US Constitution’s Bill of Rights was influenced by this document. The 4th amendment’s notion that unlawful search and seizure, the 5th amendment’s protection from loss of life, liberty, and property, the 6th amendment’s right to a speedy, jury trial, and the 10th amendment’s delegation of state rights were all directly grandfathered by the

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

Magna Carta The Magna Carta initiated the principles that led to the foundation of vital documents such as the Bill of Rights .These principles created a system of balance to limit government power to avoid problematic situations between government officials and citizens. This research paper will illustrate the history of the Magna Carta and emphasize its impact on the development of documents used for the overall well-being of a country’s individuals.

Read More
261 Words | 2 Pages

Many of history’s past influential leaders had brought forth new ideas and laws which still carry a high influence today. The code of Justinian, Corpus Juris Civilis, is regarded as one of the most influential bodies of law in the history of mankind. Justinian I, the ruler the Byzantine Empire, had previously compiled a code of law in 529. However, the code of Justinian was issued on November 16, 534, which expanded on the code of 529. Unlike many other leaders Justinian did not constitute a whole new legal code, but he instead authorized a committee, of his top protégés, to comply a collection consisting of past laws and an outline of Justinian’s own new laws.

Read More
505 Words | 3 Pages

The laws stand as a basic understanding of right from wrong and allowed civilizations to keep the most peace among their people as they

Read More
1733 Words | 7 Pages

Abstract To say that law and morality goes hand in hand would at first glance swing toward the truthful side. There should not be any distinctions between morality and the law. No difference suggests that a “good” person is one who will do what is lawful. The foundation of our Constitution built itself upon what is right and wrong – morally and lawfully.

Read More

More about Magna Carta And Salian Franks: A Comparative Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document