Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Black civil rights civil disobedience
Malcolm x vs martin luther king jr
Malcolm x vs martin luther king jr
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Black civil rights civil disobedience
Malcolm x vs martin luther king jr
Malcolm x vs martin luther king jr
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Black civil rights civil disobedience
King believed in the power of love, nonviolence, and reconciliation as means to bring about social change. He championed integration, equality, and voting rights, utilizing strategies like boycotts, sit-ins, and marches to challenge segregation and systemic racism. King's approach aimed to appeal to the conscience of the nation and gain sympathy and support for the cause. Black critics of King's nonviolent tactics, such as Malcolm X and the Black Power movement, argued that nonviolence was ineffective in the face of systemic racism and violence directed at the Black community.
King and Malcolm X civil rights movement leaders with both pros and cons to their techniques. In documents six Dr. King states how the marches and boycotts are the many weapons in their Arsenal. In document “M” Malcolm X states how the government sends one African American student to school. Although, if violence takes place all African American students would be able to go to school. Document one shows how they praised and respected each other's methods of solution for African American civil rights.
From the late 1950s to the late 1960s civil for blacks in remained a burning topic in media and everyday life. Two of the most influential to the movement were Martin Luther King Jr., a preacher from Atlanta, and Malcolm X, an ex-convict from Lansing, Michigan. King, during this era, was most well-known for quite literally preaching for non-violent civil disobedience to create social change. Conversely, X vouched for a violent revolution, a sort of fight fire with fire for the time. For the 1960s however, the ideals of king would be much more advantageous to the cause of the African Americans; in that they had little to no respect towards them from whites and violence would only cause more disrespect, the violent protests would also end
" The second quote, from Malcolm X is something different: "I don't even call it violence when it's self-defense, I call it intelligence." That states a lot about the meaning of the film and especially what the film meant during the 80’s. Martin Luther King was prominent civil rights activist who preached nonviolent civil disobedience that was based on his Christian beliefs. Malcom X was an Imam (Muslim Priest) and after being imprisoned for larceny and breaking and entering he became one of the most influential men of his time. Completely different from Martin Luther King, he promoted black supremacy, advocated the segregation between black and white Americans, and rejected the civil rights movement for their striving for integration in America.
This truly shows how how disenfranchised some African American citizens are, enough that a police officer would believe their superiority give them the right to fatally shoot an unarmed teenager. This was an incident where the victim was just peacefully minding his own business and was unrightfully murdered. Another aspect that King stresses is the importance on having peaceful campaigns and marches; he was against violence. Today’s Black Lives Matter marches and campaigns would disappoint King. Many of these protests becomes extremely violent which is against everything that King preached.
In today’s society,
MLK and Malcolm X both wanted equality but in different ways. Martin Luther King believed in nonviolence to end segregation. However, Malcolm X believed in segregation; where African Americans would govern themselves without bothering the whites. But which idea was better for society? Malcolm X’s philosophy offers a variety of solutions for
One look through the Milspec Monkey Patch book and you'll notice many patches to bring a smile to the face of those in uniform. Amazon carries a large selection of these patches for those in the military, as well as police, fire, and EMT workers. Those who carry out these jobs can often need a boost, or pick-me-up, these patches are an easy and inexpensive way to give them just that. MilSpec Monkey morale patches make wonderful gifts. Send one along to a deployed soldier, or give one to a local police officer who works in the neighborhood.
Malcolm X didn’t agree with what King’s views, he believed that MLK’s dream was not a dream but a nightmare. Martin Luther King Jr’s approach to civil rights and equality was non-violent protesting, sit-ins, and getting as much people together as possible while not using violence. However, Malcolm X’s approach to this was almost the opposite. He was against the views of whites and he was willing to do whatever was needed to achieve
Throughout his speeches, he spoke about the importance of violence and how it was often necessary to endure such harm, once stating, “Power real power, comes from our conviction which produces action, uncompromising action” (www.biography.com). Although these two men differed in their thought on violence, they often agreed on how important their fights were. Without Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X, Civil Rights would have been nonexistent,
Some, such as King, believed that life would be better with equality and integration. Others, such as X and the Black Panthers, desired the removal of black people from white society through any means necessary. The methods used by the movement were numerous, but the racism and inherent culture of discrimination in America shows that none of the means for change were entirely successful, and furthermore shows that America as a nation must continue to work towards tolerance and justice for
King’s assassination proved for some that nonviolence was an ineffective course for attaining long-sought civil rights for blacks; many felt they could no longer leave their freedom up to people who planned on attaining it through such a slow and grueling process.
"If they make the Ku Klux Klan nonviolent, I'll be nonviolent. ... But as long as you've got somebody else not being nonviolent, I don't want anybody coming to me talking any kind of nonviolent talk." He noted that there is no point if only a group of people who is trying hard to become nonviolence, but on the other hand, there were also another group of people who do violence and this is where the topic of justice comes along and according to him, if the Whites are using violence, therefore, the Blacks also need to use violence. At the outset, I did not somehow agree with his judgement but as I go along, I really managed to read what he really stands for. From my own discernment, I conceived that what Malcolm tries to deliver is that when people attack us in any manner, we should somehow attack them back in a way to protect ourselves so that others will not simply oppress and use up an action to
“It was evidenced sublimely in the refusal of Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego to obey the laws of Nebuchadnezzar, on the ground that a higher moral law was at stake. It was practiced superbly by the early Christians” (387) and “I am grateful to God that, through the influence of the Negro church, the way of nonviolence became an integral part of our struggle” (381). Dr. King uses these analogies and examples to show his followers he knows the subject matter at hand. This is another example of King showing his reputation for knowing the
According to DeNeen L. Brown of the Washington Post, Malcolm X would routinely taunt Dr King, even going so far as to accuse him of “...teaching [African Americans] to be ‘defenseless in the face of one of the most cruel beasts that has ever taken a people into captivity.’” (Brown 2018, 10) In the face of this mockery and constant pressure from not only Malcolm X, but other black social justice groups of the time, Martin Luther King Jr stood firm in his convictions, remarking, “‘We still advocate non-violence, passive resistance, and are still determined to use the weapon of love.’” (Brown 2018, 12) The two would later in life have their opinions evolve and grow somewhat closer together; Dr King became more critical of the Vietnam War and more assertive in his position on black economic justice, and Malcolm X leaned more into Dr King’s tactics of nonviolence (Brown 2018, 13.)