ipl-logo

Marc Antony Traits

659 Words3 Pages

Marc Antony, a man who is manipulative, persuasive, and even loyal to his political faction in the Roman Republic. Marc Antony, who has persuaded the citizens of Rome to unite against Brutus and the conspirators of Rome with his propaganda against them. “So let it be with Caesar.\ The noble Brutus Hath told you Caesar was ambitious” (1250.74-75). Though with lines like this when speaking to rally up the herd of civilians, though possessing seemingly unlikable leader traits, Marc Antony proves a strong candidate for a leader of Rome with these traits, and could lead Rome to victory. Marc Antony’s first quality is his predisposition to manipulation, which is heavily present during the rallying of citizens in Rome against Brutus and the conspirators …show more content…

Meaning, that he remains loyal to Caesar’s faction of Rome and her government even after Caesar’s ‘peaceful’ dismissal from power. Antony kept his allegiance even when plotting the overthrow of the conspirators and Brutus. “Our Caesar’s vesture wounded? Look you here! Here is himself, marred, as you see, with traitors” (1253.193-194). Here, Brutus, who Marc Antony promised to not betray and remain allied with, is backstabbed heavily after Brutus leaves the funeral session of Caesar, showing that Marc Antony, the right hand man of Caesar, is still loyal with Caesar’s political faction within Rome. This shows loyalty toward his predecessor, and could lead to more legislature and power within in Rome to remain aligned with the original ‘party’ of Roman leadership. This could score more political points for Marc Antony, if the people will give into his manipulation and remain loyal to Caesar and Marc Antony and fully revenge their death after the play’s story take place. The final reason Marc Antony would make a good leader is his persuasive mindset within his speeches, like presented within the funeral of Caesar. Marc Antony persuaded the people to remain Pro-Caesar, and avenge his death and kill anyone who conspired against him. “Has he, masters?\ I fear there will a worse come in his place” (1251.108-109). Here, the third citizen in the play is persuaded to thinking that

Show More
Related

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

256 Words | 2 Pages

Imagine being the right hand man of the most powerful man in a vast empire with many loyal citizens. This was Marc Antony’s reality-- until Caesar was killed. In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the title character was brutally murdered by some of his closest friends. This event left Marc Antony, the closest person to Caesar, to find a way to get revenge on the conspiratorizing companions of Caesar. He could not kill all of the conspirators alone, for he was outnumbered, so he convinced a mourning crowd of Rome’s citizens to become a mob and avenge Caesar’s death.

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices

355 Words | 2 Pages

Levi Holbert Mrs. Ridenour English 10-4 May 17, 2023 Rhetorical analysis on The Tragedy of Julius Caesar In the play a close friend of Julius Caesar named Marcus Antoninus (Marc Antony), makes a speech at Caesar’s funeral. Antony uses many forms of persuasion to convince the plebeians to rise up against the senate. In his speech many appeals to logic and emotion are used such as the taunting with and reading of the will, the use of his emotions in the form of crying for Caesar, and showing the mangled body of caesar in the pulpit.

Read More

How Does Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar

727 Words | 3 Pages

Julius Caesar is dead, and the people of Rome want answers. In 44 BCE, a group of conspirators assassinated Julius Caesar the dictator of Rome; later Shakespeare would write a play about the incident. In act 3, scene 2 of William Shakespeare’s The tragedy of Julius Caesar, Antony is able to turn the crowd of shocked and confused mourners into an angry mob of rioters through the persuasive techniques of Aristotle: Ethos, Logos, and Pathos By using the technique of Ethos Antony is able to gain the trust of the crowd, setting them up to support him.

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

763 Words | 4 Pages

He wants the audience to consider whether Brutus deserves the kind of respect that they are now giving him or whether his acts make him someone who does not deserve it. By making the plebians believe Antony is engaging with good intentions, showing them his grief over his

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

1096 Words | 5 Pages

And, sure, he is an honorable man.” Here, Antony is inquiring the civil men with questions leading to obvious answers whether or not the actions that Caesar has performed was him being selfish or just him being considerate. This quote highlights that the civilians start to realize that Brutus deceived them when he declared that the reason they killed Caesar was because he was doing it in honor of his country, but when Antony announces well known facts about the consideration he took with the Romans, it shows that he cared very deeply about them. The Romans comprehend the lies that had been told to them, so they started to riot by killing the Congressmen involved in the conspiracy. Accordingly, Antony shows the Romans the obvious truth that had been in front of them this whole time, so they’re able to understand that Caesar has been there for them this entire

Read More

How Does Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar

716 Words | 3 Pages

Their feelings now change from hatred of Caesar, to sadness that he is gone. At the end of Antony’s speech, after the addition of Brutus’s decision of murdering Caesar, he says,”My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, And I must pause till it come back to me” (III. ii. 113-144) This quote shows the citizens of how sad their trusted supporter, Antony, feels about the murder of Caesar. Since this crowd is obviously easily influenced, they begin to share the same feelings of Antony.

Read More

How Does Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar

897 Words | 4 Pages

He then goes into explaining Caesar’s wrong-doings as a leader which gets the crowd to side with him leaving Antony at risk of a checkmate, if he does not make the appropriate move. During Antony’s speech, he says “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” (III.ii.90-91). Basically, Antony is giving credit to Brutus for crediting Caesar as an ambitious leader. And since Antony spoke highly of Brutus in front of a crowd that was “pro-Brutus”, they want to listen to him now. Now that Antony has the crowd listening to him, he uses pathos as his next move.

Read More

Use Of Ethos In Julius Caesar

625 Words | 3 Pages

Marc Antony’s use of ethos and irony help convince the people of Rome to see that Brutus was indeed not an honorable man. After Brutus’s speech, Marc Antony faces the crowd and delivers his thoughts on Caesar and the conspirators and states,”Good friends, sweet friends, let me not

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

556 Words | 3 Pages

In Julius Caesar, a drama written by William Shakespeare, it explores themes of ambition, betrayal, and political intrigue in ancient Rome. The play shows how ambition can lead to downfall and explores the tough choices people can face in leadership. Through the use of diction that implies how Brutus is dishonorable, juxtaposition, and appeals to the Plebeians grief, Antony tries to get them to turn against the conspirators to start a civil war. Antony uses this dictation to imply that Caesar is a really good man who cares about his people and that Brutus and the conspirators are murderers who don’t care about their leader. Throughout Brutus’s speech, he mentioned several times how Caesar was an ambitious leader, so Antony tells them that, “When the

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Essay On Julius Caesar

1322 Words | 6 Pages

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar Summative Essay Sincerity and honesty overthrows the act of being self centered. An emotional approach will almost always get the attention of a crowd over someone immediately trying to cover for themselves and make themselves look good. Marc Antony is a friend of Julius Caesar in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by Shakespeare. Antony and Brutus both have very different approaches to the audience and the way they speak to them. Brutus and Antony both have very persuasive speeches however Antony’s speech is overall better because he connects with the audience emotionally and he uses better devices within the speech.

Read More

Mark Antony's Manipulation In Julius Caesar

534 Words | 3 Pages

Manipulation is a very important aspect in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. One specific character, Mark Antony, shows to be an eloquent speaker, persuasive, and great at deception, all of which are necessary skills to be a good manipulator. Mark Antony is the most manipulative, and devious character in the play, demonstrated through his funeral speech. When Mark Antony speaks to the citizens at the funeral of Julius Caesar, he immediately earns the respect of his audience. He does this in two main ways.

Read More

Julius Caesar Persuasive Essay

346 Words | 2 Pages

Mark Antony has many ideal qualities about him. He is clever, confident, and devoted to those he loves. To fool the conspirators into believing he is on their side, Antony uses persuasive techniques, which will be revealed further on. After fooling the conspirators,

Read More

Moral Independence In Julius Caesar Research Paper

1892 Words | 8 Pages

Antony sees this as an act to try to convince him to stay on Brutus’ side, but isn’t fazed and stays loyal to his best friend, Caesar. This quote displays Brutus’ bipolar emotions because he just went from speaking angrily and viciously toward the killing of Caesar, to praising Antony for his loyalty to Caesar.(CA) Brutus can not make a decision for himself which causes his opinion to change multiple times throughout the book. Without knowing the end of the play ahead of time, people wouldn’t know what side Brutus would

Read More

Julius Caesar Essay: Brutus Vs. Antony

534 Words | 3 Pages

Brutus Versus Antony William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar is an extremely intricate play, full of important events. The two speeches of Brutus and Marc Antony, which revolve around the topic of Caesar’s murder, are no exception. Although both succeed in stirring up the commoners, one of them greatly surpasses the other. First of all, the audience is at two very different standpoints at the beginning of both speeches. On one hand, Brutus’s crowd dislikes his cause and Caesar’s killing at first.

Read More

Brutus In Shakespeare's The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar

627 Words | 3 Pages

Ancient Rome; the setting by which Julius Caesar’s successes led him to his tragic death. Killed by some of his closest companions, one of which named Marcus Brutus, they justify their crime by the means of the people and the betterment of their country; Rome. In the play, ‘The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”, by William Shakespeare, Brutus, after killing his friend, in light of the danger of Caesar’s growing ambition, uses ethos, logos, and pathos to meet ends with the people of Rome in a speech following the death of Julius Caesar himself. On the other hand, the mourning Marc Antony, a close friend and admirer of Julius Caesar, uses similar methods to speak out against Brutus and the other conspirators for their act of injustice and brutality.

Read More

More about Marc Antony Traits

Open Document