Marc Antony Traits

659 Words3 Pages

Marc Antony, a man who is manipulative, persuasive, and even loyal to his political faction in the Roman Republic. Marc Antony, who has persuaded the citizens of Rome to unite against Brutus and the conspirators of Rome with his propaganda against them. “So let it be with Caesar.\ The noble Brutus Hath told you Caesar was ambitious” (1250.74-75). Though with lines like this when speaking to rally up the herd of civilians, though possessing seemingly unlikable leader traits, Marc Antony proves a strong candidate for a leader of Rome with these traits, and could lead Rome to victory. Marc Antony’s first quality is his predisposition to manipulation, which is heavily present during the rallying of citizens in Rome against Brutus and the conspirators …show more content…

Meaning, that he remains loyal to Caesar’s faction of Rome and her government even after Caesar’s ‘peaceful’ dismissal from power. Antony kept his allegiance even when plotting the overthrow of the conspirators and Brutus. “Our Caesar’s vesture wounded? Look you here! Here is himself, marred, as you see, with traitors” (1253.193-194). Here, Brutus, who Marc Antony promised to not betray and remain allied with, is backstabbed heavily after Brutus leaves the funeral session of Caesar, showing that Marc Antony, the right hand man of Caesar, is still loyal with Caesar’s political faction within Rome. This shows loyalty toward his predecessor, and could lead to more legislature and power within in Rome to remain aligned with the original ‘party’ of Roman leadership. This could score more political points for Marc Antony, if the people will give into his manipulation and remain loyal to Caesar and Marc Antony and fully revenge their death after the play’s story take place. The final reason Marc Antony would make a good leader is his persuasive mindset within his speeches, like presented within the funeral of Caesar. Marc Antony persuaded the people to remain Pro-Caesar, and avenge his death and kill anyone who conspired against him. “Has he, masters?\ I fear there will a worse come in his place” (1251.108-109). Here, the third citizen in the play is persuaded to thinking that