ipl-logo

Marijuana Policy Summary

1079 Words5 Pages

Over the past decade, there has been substantial debate over policies regarding the legalization of marijuana for medical and recreational use in the United States. In recent years, even the nation’s capital legalized the use of recreational cannabis. These sweeping changes have led to extensive debate over the power of states and the national government in creating laws to regulate these once-illegal substances. This debate presents a significant policy problem that can be analyzed from the perspective of Deborah Stone, author of Public Paradox The Art of Political Decision Making. Stone offers five methods that can be used to study policy problems: they are symbols, numbers, causes, interests, and decisions (Stone 2012, vii). Each method …show more content…

One of the most significant points in Armentano’s argument is his presentation of a Pew Research Center poll that reports, “60 percent of Americans believe the government ‘should not enforce federal marijuana laws in states that allow use’” (Wanlund 2015, 881). His presentation of a public opinion poll in which the numerical majority concur with his argument makes his argument seem well supported. When addressing why this method of problem definition can be so effective, Stone notes, “People react to being counted or measured… The process of counting something makes people notice it more” (Stone 2012, 203). Measuring evidence in numerical terms, according to the author of Policy Paradox, is an extremely effective way of persuading the public to see problems with policy proposals. Although quantitative measurements are easily manipulated and polls like the one Armentano uses as evidence can be perceived in different perspectives, Stone notes the effectiveness of numbers in defining policy …show more content…

Stone employs this device for defining policy problems as a method of creating an argument in the polis based on the root causes of an issue (Stone 2012, 225). With this method, debates can be formed on the premise of why the other side is wrong, and from there be built on the principles of the other side is correct. This model is used in Armentano’s essay when he presents several reasons for why the federal government’s involvement in this issue is harmful to Americans. He argues, “Enforcement of cannabis prohibition financially burdens taxpayers, encroaches on civil liberties, engenders disrespect for the law… and disproportionately affects young people and communities of color” (Wanlund 2015, 881). By highlighting the various negative aspects of government involvement in these policies, Armentano challenges those that oppose state sponsored policies, while simultaneously placing blame on the government for these policy problems. Armentano supports his argument by highlighting the causes of this problem, which are exacerbated by federal policies as opposed to state regulations in this

Show More
Related
1748 Words | 7 Pages

In the 1960’s marijuana use had no outstanding effects on the United States people but in today's society the use of marijuana had become a huge epidemic over the past years. Even though it has been scientifically proven that marijuana can help seizures, Crohn’s, and effects of cancer, yet many people in today's society still believe that it has no use. In the United States 45 percent of drug arrest in 2013 were due to marijuana, but at Woodstock in 1969 when there was a controversial “Drug War” no one was arrested for marijuana (Merino par. 3). The use of marijuana is more strict in the United States now then it was in

Read More
1454 Words | 6 Pages

After examination of primary sources and comparing them with the secondary source arguments, there are three main findings. The three main results have to do with the suggested time period studied, what events spurred change, and for what category the policies should be regarded as. This section is broken down into three sub-sections, with each based on the type of primary source examined. The sections are newspapers, governmental records, and an investigative report. The first section is very important to set the timeframe of the argument, as well as view how public opinion evolved over a long span of time.

Read More
221 Words | 1 Pages

In this articles, the writer wrote about a survey research that he conduct to find out if medical marijuana should be legalize. All of his data has been review by Michael W. Smith, a medical director whose responsible for upholding all the credibility and accuracy for web MD health information. In this articles, Rapold Scott present the statistic that he gather through the survey, the survey compose of two side of response, one is from doctor and the other are from the consumer. According to his statistic, both side response is pretty even out. According to the response from doctor, they said it depend on the department, because some of the patient that the oncologist and hematologist has, need marijuana to treat their patient, so those two

Read More
1208 Words | 5 Pages

Policy “Whether we like it or not, the actions of policy-makers, public service professionals, markets and our fellow citizens around us have big, and often unintended, impacts on our behavior” (Dolan, 2014). There is many ways in which policy makers can make policies that the people will want and need but the main way is to listen to the needs and wants rather than to make policy based on their own personal agendas or that of those that lobby to them. Most are under the assumption that “government policies are intended to solve or at least cope with major social and economic problems” (Milakovich & Gordon, 2013, p. 375-376). Polices are not just written up and implemented, even though that is one of the five major assumptions about policy

Read More
147 Words | 1 Pages

As a second year MPH student concentrating in Epidemiology, one area that I believe we lack in our concentration is a sufficient understanding of Health Policy. An ongoing epidemiology debate is “Should epidemiologist discuss the policy implication of their data within the scientific report itself? One side of the argument claims that epidemiologist don’t know enough about health policy to discuss policy implications and including it would trivialize a complex process. However on the other hand, it is thought that adding policy to papers would be beneficial and aid in the process of Health Policy.

Read More
2492 Words | 10 Pages

He analyses a bottom-up approach to policy making in this book but fails to state if it is adequate. Up until this book was published, the majority of people looked at policy making from a top-down perspective. Since the 1980’s there has been increased debate over which approach is more effective (Gabel, 2012). Top-down implementation occurs when the government set policies and instructions on how to implement these policies. This makes it clear-cut because it is clear and based solely around agency objectives.

Read More
1370 Words | 6 Pages

Many of the policies that exist today are very successful. Policies have a lot of ways they can come about, some of which include, congress passing a law, a presidential direction or even a supreme court ruling. Creating these policies are created by a powerful persons techniques and have that person's logic and what

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

Lindblom, who was not only a Sterling Processor Emeritus of Political Science and Economics at Yale University, but was one of the early developers and advocates of the theory of incrementalism (Bevir, 2007). He “rejected the…idea of policy making as a process of rational analysis culminating in a value-maximizing decision, arguing instead that policies result from” plural processes that are adapted from interactions from multiple actors “advocating different values” and interests (id.). He further asserted that “decision makers cannot make the simultaneous comparisons required by the rational model” as it limits the comparisons, making those involved select “options that are at least a little better than other possibilities” (Patton, Sawicki, & Clark, 2013, p. 41). Lindblom adopted his ideas from Herbert Simon who was considered to be one of the founding fathers of today’s decision-making and problem-solving domains. Simon developed the realistic model for decision makers to predict future outcomes.

Read More
1178 Words | 5 Pages

Today the demands are changing in different states. In States such as Colorado and Washington, marijuana has been legalized for recreational use. This move raised several questions as far as decriminalization of marijuana is concerned. Besides portraying the US in a bad light, legalization of marijuana for recreation increases the risk of developing mental problems, increases government expenditure on public health, jeopardizes the future of children, and is a gateway to other dangerous drugs. Increased health problems and public health expenditure-

Read More
965 Words | 4 Pages

This need for confidence in data quality makes sense, as half the respondents stated that anticipation of policy maker or public opinion about their work has affected their

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

The topic of this controversial essay will be about is the legalization of marijuana. I will be advocating for the legalization of marijuana. The legalization of marijuana is so controversial because it was outlawed in the past, but now people are discovering new things it could do and wish to have it legalized once again. The legalization of marijuana can offer medical benefits, generate a lot of tax money, and decreases prisoner space. The legalization of marijuana can offer many health benefits.

Read More
1693 Words | 7 Pages

In the past decade, a number of movements to legalize the use of marijuana has been gaining momentum. According to the 2016 Gallup survey, a record high 60% of Americans say that marijuana should be legalized and this figure marks a 9% increase compared to 2014. Support for legalizing marijuana was 31% in 2000, 50% in 2016 before reaching 60% last year. This shows that despite government efforts to eliminate its use, marijuana is becoming more popular. It is clear that

Read More
3038 Words | 13 Pages

The third part investigates the implications which model of dialogical understanding could bring to policy analysis. The last part discusses about the limitations of dialogical model of understanding when being applied to policy analysis. Part I 1.

Read More
1471 Words | 6 Pages

This gives them strong incentives to alter policy in ways that will be more effective in the future. One strand of work in this tradition examines how

Read More
741 Words | 3 Pages

2.1.1 Definition of Public Policy Many theorists define “Policy” and “Public Policy” in several ways, depending on their objectives and on the direction of study and analysis. For example, Dye (2004) described Public Policy as what a government has chosen to practice or not to practice. While, Anderson (1979) states that the public policy is a moving direction and is set up to solve problems. In addition, Laswell and Kaplan (Lasswell & Kaplan, 1970, p. 71) define public policy as “a project or programs of goals, values, and practices.” Easton (1960) defines "Policy" as the authoritative allocation of values for the benefit of the public as a whole.

Read More

More about Marijuana Policy Summary

Related Topics

Open Document