I’ve had a couple of life experiences that have shaped my mind to think differently, such as when I nearly drowned in the ocean, or when I fractured my ankle by jumping over a bean bag chair. With multiple weeks spent in a boot and a slight but undeniable fear of rip currents, I’ve managed to gather an interest in orthopedics and ocean life; as a result, I have decided to research further into being a surgeon (specializing in orthopedics), and a marine biologist. These two careers contrast drastically, specifically in required education and salary, work environment, and job outlooks. Although being an orthopedic surgeon and a marine biologist both require a certain amount of extended education beyond high school, they contrast in how much is necessary. According to Barbara Sheen, “postsecondary aspiring surgeons must obtain a bachelor’s degree, which usually takes four years. Then they must attend medical school for an additional four years and upon graduation from medical school, aspiring surgeons must complete a surgical residency program, ranging from 3 to 8 years” (65). On top of taking excessive …show more content…
When conducting research, a marine biologist “may spend a significant amount of time outdoors” (“What is a Marine Biologist?”). Since I enjoy the outdoors, this would be beneficial in making my job more enjoyable. On the other hand, orthopedic surgeons work in a hospital, particularly holding pre and postsurgical examinations in a medical room, and perform surgeries in a sterile surgery room. Orthopedic surgeons work 4-5 days per week, but could work 50-60 hour work weeks and must be on call for emergencies on their “days off” (Sheen 68-69). The discrepancies between the work environments of a marine biologist and an orthopedic surgeon are significant. Since I appreciate the outdoors, I would lean towards a marine biologist in this