ipl-logo

Mark Antony Is Better Than Marcus Caesar

515 Words3 Pages

Having honor is truly better than not having any at all. Having honor is way better to have than not having any is because it shows how much of a true person you are, and it also shows how much respect you have for other people. Having honor also defines what kind of person you are and shows your growth as a person. Although mark Antony delivers the more effective speech because he does it better than Brutus and overall, better with the crowd who sides with him.

Mark Antony is more of an honorable man than Marcus Brutus because Antony actually came out with Caesars body and while carrying it as well and was the one who gave him a funeral. Mark Antony came out carrying Caesars body after Brutus finished his speech to the people. Antony came out with two other people beside him. Antony came out to give him a funeral and was also honoring Caesar. Mark Antony has more honor than Brutus and also cares more about Caesar than Brutus does. Antony comes with Caesars body and when the crowd sees that they want an explanation from antony so he gives them right when Brutus leaves. …show more content…

Antony wanted the crowd to listen to him and what he had to say. He also wanted to do nothing else but bury Caesar and have a funeral for him. He also had no other motives but to have a funeral while Brutus left and not staying for the funeral on honoring Caesar. Antony also wants to protect Caesars legacy and only wants to protect it and not ruin his legacy and he also isn't saying anything bad about Caesar. Mark Antony was also the better person to give the speech because the crowd turned against Brutus and went to Antonys side right

Show More
Related

How Does Antony Use Rhetoric In Julius Caesar

825 Words | 4 Pages

Antony begins his speech by saying the he is only allowed to have a speech because of Brutus. Antony gave his speech by using emotional appeal. He then says that he doesn’t mean to praise Caesar and that when he’s buried, Caesar should be remembered by his faults. In Act III, Sc. 2 Antony says, “The noble Brutus Hath told you Caesar was a grievous fault, and grievously hath Caesar answered it.

Read More

Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar

1035 Words | 5 Pages

Brutus on the other hand does not use irony, and this adds up to why Mark Antony had the better speech. Mark Antony reveals the actions of the conspirators, using the body of Caesar and in irony remarks, "I fear I wrong the honorable men/ whose daggers have stabbed Caesar." (III.ii.163­164) This is ironic, because men cannot be honored if they just killed a man that was falsely accused of being ambitious. Although Antony still abides by the restrictions that he cannot say anything bad against the conspirators, his tone is so sarcastic and ironic that even the plebeians figure it out and reply with, "They were traitors. Honorable men?"

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices

592 Words | 3 Pages

Scene two of act three in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar shows two orators, consisting of Mark Antony and Brutus, giving speeches to a crowd at Caesar’s funeral. Both of them want to convince the audience that their position on the assassination of Julius Caesar is correct. The two both use rhetorical devices to backup their positions. In the end, Antony is victorious. Even though the two speeches have similarities, they also have many differences that made Antony’s speech just that little bit better.

Read More

Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar

638 Words | 3 Pages

Both speeches are absolutely loaded with rhetorical questions. Brutus and Antony both refer to Brutus as being honorable. Brutus and Antony say quite a bit about Caesar's accomplishments while he was alive. Both men proclaim their love and friendship to Caesar. Conversely, Antony lies to the audience many times, whereas Brutus doesn’t.

Read More

Brutus Vs Antony Rhetorical Analysis

877 Words | 4 Pages

After analyzing the logos, ethos, and pathos of these speeches it is clear that Antony understood his audience more and thus he had the best speech. Antony knew that his audience didn't care about ethos so he used it briefly. Brutus relied mostly on logos whereas Antony gave just enough for the crowd to rally around. However the major component of Antony’s speech is his use of pathos.

Read More

Brutus And Marc Antony Rhetorical Analysis

777 Words | 4 Pages

Rhetorical Analysis 2 Caesar's funeral was meant to serve as a memorial to his honor and accomplishments. But both Brutus and Marc Antony seized the opportunity to try to lure the crowd into believing their version of the story, and follow them in the next chapter of Rome. Brutus was the first to speak with blood still on his hands, and he gave his speech in prose using ethos as his main weapon. Marc Antonty spoke next, using blank verse.

Read More

When Was Caesar Honorable

502 Words | 3 Pages

The best way to show honor is being honorable to a cause. Brutus is more honorable than Antony because he is selfless for a good cause, is concerned for the future of Rome, and he is fearful for what Caesar might do to Rome. Antony is honorable because he is loyal to Caesar, he is cunning and he manipulated the conspirators. Antony is loyal to Caesar because even after Caesar was dead Antony continued to praise him. "Thou art the ruins of the noblest man/That ever lived in the tide of times" (3,i,256-257)

Read More

Julius Caesar Pathos

916 Words | 4 Pages

He wanted to take care of the people. By saying all this he tries to point out why Brutus was wrong with saying the reason he killed Caesar was because he was ambitious. As Antony speaks, he continues to repeat the line that "Brutus was an honorable man." He does this so that the crowd will catch onto his sarcasm. Brutus only allowed Antony to come speak if he would only say good things about Brutus, so Antony decides to use repetition and sarcasm as well as a way to engage the

Read More

Pathos In Julius Caesar

850 Words | 4 Pages

The motivation behind Antony’s actions was completely selfish as he wanted to defend and avenge Caesar, gain power by giving himself credibility as Caesar’s right hand man, and unleash utter chaos in Rome by invoking civil war. Antony’s speech was able to completely reverse the effects that Brutus’ speech had simply because people care more about what agitates their emotions, rather than what logically makes more sense to

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Marc Antony's Speech

617 Words | 3 Pages

However, Brutus was honorable in a way because he let Marc Antony speak

Read More

Why Did The Us Lose The Vietnam War Essay

574 Words | 3 Pages

The Vietnam War was one of the most controversial conflicts in American history. Lasting from 1955 to 1975, the war was fought between communist North Vietnam and South Vietnam, which was backed by the United States. Despite massive military and economic support, the United States ultimately lost the war. This essay will examine the factors that contributed to the United States' defeat in the Vietnam War.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony's Speech

884 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar

Read More

Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony Speech

824 Words | 4 Pages

Julius Caesar Speech Comparison Essay Brutus and Antony have prepared a speech about Julius Caesar is to convince the citizens of Rome to agree and be by their side. Brutus is the person talking about how it was good for their leader to die. While Antony talks about how it wasn’t good for Julius Caesar to die. It was not a very good idea to kill Caesar, Antony convinced many citizens of Rome. This is why Mark Antony gave a better speech than Brutus.

Read More

Mark Antony's Speech Analysis

1793 Words | 8 Pages

His move gives him a greater common ground with the crowd. He provides many examples to prove that Caesar wasn’t ambitious like “I thrice presented him a kingly crown which he did thrice refuse.” Antony continues that Caesar sympathized and felt for the poor: “When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept. Mark Antony manipulates the crowd so that his beliefs become theirs. Antony is ultimately the better orator because of his understanding of the

Read More

The Theme Of Betrayal In Julius Caesar

1177 Words | 5 Pages

There are two reasons why Antony gave this speech. The first was to get back at Brutus for murdering his beloved friend, and making him pay for it. The main reason Antony gave this speech is because he had a greed for power. He thought that if he could get all the plebeians on his side, that they would attack the conspirators and trust Antony, therefore making it easy to take on the spot for power. “Our course will seem too bloody, Caius Cassius, To cut the head off and then hack the limbs, Like wrath in death and envy afterwards, For Antony is but a limb of Caesar.

Read More

More about Mark Antony Is Better Than Marcus Caesar

Related Topics

Open Document