ipl-logo

Mark Milke The Benefits Of Nafta

818 Words4 Pages

Both articles discuss what purpose The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) should serve. However, the authors have different views regarding NAFTA. I am analyzing the second article because I appreciate the way the author portrays NAFTA. The author, Mark
Milke, focuses on the benefits of the free trade agreement by using normative, positive, and analytical statements. These statements help him further the case he is making in his article.
Mark Milke shares his opinion that NAFTA talks should stick to helping consumers and taxpayers, not pet clauses. He states that free trade agreements like NAFTA have greatly benefited people. NAFTA came into effect creating one of the world’s largest free trade zones and laying the foundations for …show more content…

Otherwise, they risk cratering that which has benefitted entire populations, including their own”(Milke).
Milke writes to the general public to inform them of the benefits of NAFTA and to remind them of the point of free trade arrangements.
Over the years, the free trade agreement has accomplished a variety of things, which benefited many individuals. This idea is seen throughout Milke’s article. The free trade agreement has led to a dramatic increase in wealth and a significant decrease in the poverty level within North America. Milke uses statistics in his article to support this. “Those living in
Parsons 2 extreme poverty declined from 55 percent of the world’s population to 24 percent as of 2015.
Meanwhile, those living in extreme poverty (defined as living on one dollar a day or less, adjusted for inflation) declined from 44 per cent of the world’s population in 1981 to less than 10 per cent by 2015”(Milke). Not only did NAFTA decrease poverty in North America, it also lowered the prices for goods and services drastically helping consumers. The free …show more content…

This helped increase the United States GDP which then led to a growth in jobs.
“For NAFTA countries, free trade has been beneficial, not harmful, as the increase in employment demonstrates: 40 million more people are at work now in Canada, Mexico and the
United States as compared with 23 years ago at the start of NAFTA”(Milke). Milke analyzes the benefits of NAFTA by comparing past statistics to present day statistics. This is a very eye opening technique because it allows the reader to see how far the trade agreement has come.
There are many benefits for countries who seek trading. For one, trade reduces the the cost of living. “Countries that do engage in trade tend to have much higher prices for the goods and services available in their economies. Trade lowers trade barriers through negotiation and the result is reduced costs of production (because imports used in production are cheaper), reduced prices of finished goods and services, and more consumer choice”(“Principles of
Economics”). Milke does a good job explaining the benefits of NAFTA throughout his article.
However, he only discusses a few of the benefits. Therefore, discussing a couple more benefits of NAFTA would strengthen his case. In the article, Milke fails to include that trade

Show More
Related
740 Words | 3 Pages

NAFTA has had a beneficial effect on the automotive business, “NAFTA helped the U.S. auto industry survive”(Hanson), without the help of this trade agreement cars would be produced at a much higher opportunity cost. Although now, the U.S. is able to trade with Mexico and Canada who are both making car parts at a lower price while still producing efficiently, “The U.S. auto industry designed a very efficient production network that spanned the U.S., Mexico and Canada. ”(Hanson). The trade agreement made products from Mexico and Canada cheaper to import. ,“NAFTA increased farm exports because it eliminated high Mexican tariffs”(The Balance).

Read More
1226 Words | 5 Pages

With tariffs and surtaxes placed on goods, this allowed the three North American countries to trade freely. For Mexico, the NAFTA deal was designed for poor people to not move to the U.S because the economy in Mexico would be stimulated. For Canada this was considered to be a plus for the economy. Jobs were expected to increase, revenues streams flowing into the country expected to soar and the national debt expect to drop significantly. Instead what happened was that many jobs were being lost because foreign companies have moved back to their respective countries.

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

The NAFTA is a free trade agreement that was formed between the three countries of North America, or more specifically Canada, the United States, and Mexico. The main function of NAFTA is to eliminate all trade barriers between the three countries, such as tariffs, to lower the prices of groceries produced by the three countries involved. NAFTA grants the “most-favoured-nation” status to goods produced by the countries involved, which means that these goods must receive equal treatment as domestic goods. They also cannot give a better deal to non-NAFTA countries. This trade agreement greatly benefited the economies of the three countries, and increased the Canadian-Mexican trade eightfold and total merchandise trade between Canada and the United states more than doubled.

Read More
1013 Words | 5 Pages

• Reduce Tariffs and Non-Tariff Barriers between Canada, Mexico and the US: In January 1994, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was enacted to allow free trade among Canada, Mexico and the US (Al Jazeera, 2017). The agreement wished to support business transactions between these countries for continued economic success and growth with a focus in agriculture, automobiles, and textiles (NAFTA's Economic Impact, n.d.). Most tariffs between these countries were dissolved ten to fifteen years after the agreement was signed. (Guerrero et al, p. 40) • The Distribution of Welfare: Reflecting on NAFTA’s success, trade between member countries significantly increased close to four times the pre-agreement quantities. However, these benefits

Read More
402 Words | 2 Pages

NAFTA has also benefited United States Of America in multiple ways, including the way it has reduced USA’s trade deficit. The trade deficit between the United States and Mexico and Canada has increased by an average of 150 billion dollars per year, and produced a trade surplus in the United States favor of $28 billion after 15 years of trade. Doing this it has also increased USA’s investment of tangible assets, including mining, manufacturing, insurance, and banking. The investment in USA’s money in tangible assets in Mexico and Canada has increased by 2 percent e year since NAFTA has been signed. One major benefit that US obtained during this agreement was having lower oil prices.

Read More
204 Words | 1 Pages

In this video Friedman discusses the role that the government plays in trade. He personally supports the free trade form of trade. He discusses free trade using international trade as his example, but it is believed that domestic trade possesses the same principles as international trade. Another key point for Friedman in this video is tariffs. It is believed that if we do not put tariffs on foreign products and the foreign manufacturer is able to produce it for less of a price than the domestic manufacturer; then, only the foreign product is being purchased.

Read More
1585 Words | 7 Pages

A particular World Trade Agreement that aids in trade and world relations is the North American Trade Organization. This trade agreement is composed of North America, Canada, and Mexico. To clarify, the of the primary goal of the North American Trade Agreement is to reduce trade barriers, encourage economic development, and

Read More
1491 Words | 6 Pages

After years of negotiations, Canada has landed a deal with the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) – the world’s largest free trade agreement in history – sweeping a deal that will open vast economic opportunities in Asia-Pacific and the Americas. With minimal costs, Canada will significantly benefit from the TPP with lower costs for consumers, a boost to gross domestic product (GDP) and lower trade barriers such as tariffs for exporters. TPP’s skeptics are many of the same people who criticized the North American Free Trade Agreement and Canadian-European Union Free Trade Agreement for very similar reasons. This landmark free trade agreement includes 12 countries (Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore,

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

First, we should make sure that we cover all aspects of North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) 1994. This trade agreement allowed free trade zone for U.S, Canada, and Mexico. The goal was to decrease trading costs and make these countries completive in the global marketplace (Amadeo, 2017).

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

“George H. Bush and Bill Clinton’s dream of NAFTA is finally starting to come to fruition. NAFTA was philosophically partly based on the premise that uniting the economies of Mexico the United States and Canada through trade would create a larger economic market to compete with China. Practically it was also based on the idea that if the Mexican economy grew rapidly, fewer Mexican immigrants would come into the United States.” (2013) “According to Gary Hufbauer, a Senior Fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, “U.S. trade with its North American partners grew 156 percent in 20 years. Of course all three economies are larger: real North American gross domestic product grew 70 percent between 1993 and 2013 But real two-way trade grew faster than real gross domestic product, by a margin of 86 percentage points.””

Read More
1636 Words | 7 Pages

Many blames the substantial loss of jobs, as U.S. companies outsource and ship tasks to Mexico, Latin America and South-East Asia as an outcome of this liberalized trade contract. " Argument a decade back over the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, drew loud cautions that liberalized trade with Mexico would lead to substantial job losses in the United States Trade with Mexico has actually skyrocketed given that NAFTA's debut in 1994, but recent research studies have concluded that the United States did lose more tasks in different markets than it gained because of the pact" (Wall Street Journal, December 8,

Read More
738 Words | 3 Pages

In 1994, the North American Free Trade Agreement was made, creating one of the world's largest free trade zones. Although China has been an increasingly important source for imports, the United States’ neighbors, Canada and Mexico, have been among its major trading partners for a long time. It is because of this that NAFTA was negotiated and came into effect in 1994. This agreement strengthened the rules of trade and investment, setting an example of the benefits of trade liberalization for the rest of the world. NAFTA has brought economic growth and the rising standards of living for citizens in all three countries.

Read More
673 Words | 3 Pages

The "giant sucking sound" was given by United States presidential candidate Ross Perot,he believed would be the negative effects of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Even though, from my perspective, the benefits that North American Free Trade Agreement brings to the world is much bigger than disadvantage. First of all, the territorial economic and the development of trade has a good impact on the United States, the good impact is:1. Not only the industrial manufacturing enterprises can get benefits, the high-technology industrial section will also increase exports to Canada and Mexico. 2.

Read More
549 Words | 3 Pages

This was because free trade leads to more opportunity and wealth. Free trade allows the world become more dynamic compared to the static world of protectionism, encouraging people to dream compared to being content with what they

Read More
1148 Words | 5 Pages

Tariffs on Steel and Aluminum will only come off if new & fair NAFTA agreement is signed.” However, while NAFTA may bring some significant disadvantages in terms of growing trade between the allied countries it isn’t all bad. Since the agreement was made in 1993 at $290 billion, the total trade amount has grown exponentially reaching a total of $1.1 trillion in the year of 2016. In fact, even in the year of 2014 the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE), stated that the United States has gained a total of $127 billion each year thanks to trade growth facilitated through NAFTA. Unfortunately however, for the United States, the NAFTA agreement has come with many disadvantages, and ultimately outweighing its positive effects on

Read More

More about Mark Milke The Benefits Of Nafta

Related Topics

Open Document