ipl-logo

The Conflict Between Social Classes

1034 Words5 Pages

Social classes were more of a social relationship rather than a position or rank in society. The bourgeoisie could not exist without the proletariat, or vice-versa. Classes are an essential aspect of production, the division of labor and the labor process. The relationship between the rich and the poor is further contradictory in that it is not just two sets of interests, but there is no resolution of the capital-labor contradiction within the organization of capitalism as a system. As stated by Rummel (1977), Marx observed the society to its main classes, and the struggle amid them as the engine of modification. The arrangement itself was a derivative and ingredient in the conflicts between social classes. As Marx saw the change in class conflict, …show more content…

Society tends to display inequality of rights and privileges also called as favoritism; this favoritism is mostly among high-status people and this favoritism creates possible conflicts in the society. Nonetheless, conflict embodies different levels; these levels are potentiality, dispositions, or manifestations. Space of possibilities is called potentiality, thus, conflict as potentiality is the space of possible conflicts. On the other hand, at the level of dispositions and powers, there are two facets of conflict - conflict-structure and conflict-situation. Dispositions opposing each other within the conflict space is called conflict-structure whereas situation which opposing tendencies are activated and opposing powers are manifested is known as conflict-situation (Rummel, 1976). This study showed that conflict arises …show more content…

Moreover, this exposed that levels of conflict are based on opposition of things. Thus, this explained that conflict is just a possibility if there are no inequality of dispositions and manifestation of powers.
Hierarchical class as discussed by Karl Marx is where people in community is divided into different levels of powers, susceptibilities and wealth. Thus, this division causes the conflicts and class struggle of the community. However, this class struggle is relevant to the world’s situation and is undoubtedly present in the Philippines. This class struggle shows that the workers and peasants have less benefits which gives the extraordinary complications and poverties in their lives. In a blog posted in the internet by Annis (2012), it discussed the testament of the Movement for the National Democracy leader, Pete Pinlac of the MAKABAYAN labour and political center in the Philippines spoke at a public forum hosted by the
Vancouver and District Labour Council (VDLC). Likewise, this exposed that the economic and political situation in the Philippines is splendid. However, this explained that the economic crisis of the world has been affected the country rigidly. Moreover, this portrays the excessive difficulties of

Show More
Related
1100 Words | 5 Pages

Jones’ book is conflict perspective. Leon-Guerrero (2009) writes, “conflict theorists consider how society is held together by power and coercion (Ritzer 2000) for the benefit of those in power” (Leon-Guerrero, 2009, p. 14). Leon-Guerrero (2009) goes on to state that Karl Marx was the first to make the argument of conflict theory. Marx focused on the conflict between social classes. There is at most times a tension between the proletariat (workers) and the bourgeoisie (owners) (Leon-Guerrero, 2009, p. 14).

Read More
393 Words | 2 Pages

In Lee’s To Kill A Mockingbird, her repetition of individuals’ socioeconomic class tending to predetermine their destiny by influencing their life-choices is prevalent via symbolism. There’s numerous occasion within the context of the novel, in which symbolism is utilized to portray differences in social-hierarchy; these differences ultimately manifest into predestined synthesizations. Additionally, the audience of To Kill A Mockingbird experience fictional characters to symbolically represent how classism catalyzes ascertainable developments. To Kill A Mockingbird unequivocally acts as a portrayal of socioeconomic class predetermining the outcome of individuals.

Read More
1018 Words | 5 Pages

Karl Marx, a ground breaking sociologist, economist, and philosopher, lived from 1818 to 1883. During his lifetime he propounded this epic sociologic perspective, the conflict theory. (McClelland) The conflict theory discusses how the rich and the poor have been fighting ongoing battle for power. The group in control actively defends their advantages.

Read More
926 Words | 4 Pages

It is argued that social inequality occurs because of the conflict between the upper-class and the working-class, or as Marx defines it, the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat. Based on the Manifesto of the Communist Party (Marx and Engels, 1848), the divergence emerges because the aim of the Bourgeoisie is to obtain a surplus-value that is produced by the work of the Proletariat. On the other side, the Bourgeoisie provides the Proletariat with the minimum required, such as a place to live and a minimum wage, in order to keep the society under control and avoid a rebellion. However, Marx did predict a revolt of the working-class that would eventually lead to a communist regime. When it comes to applying this theoretical approach to reality, it is evident to notice that no global revolt in regards to capitalism has occurred.

Read More
608 Words | 3 Pages

I believe social classes have defined our society in many ways. In America, they separate people into three different classes: the upper class, middle class, and the lower or working class. Based on wealth and various occupations, social classes determine the population’s status in society. Social classes today define individuals and influence their actions. Although people born in a certain class may choose to stay there, they also have the choice of leaving.

Read More
759 Words | 4 Pages

Marx and Engel focused on class conflict as the driving force for their argument. Throughout history, there is a common theme of a caste society lasting for so long until the mistreated lower class attempt to break the cycle; but that system is only replaced with a new

Read More
1091 Words | 5 Pages

Marx believed that the class struggle forced social change. Marx’s theory is based on a class system

Read More
764 Words | 4 Pages

Karl Marx’s class theory lies upon the premise that "the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles." He meant by this that ever since the inception of modern human society, people have been always divided into classes which are in conflict with each other due to class interests. An argument against class interests is that they are not given ab initio, they arise out of exposure of people occupying different social positions in varying social contexts. Karl Marx and Engels divided the masses into three broad classes, the proletariats, the petty bourgeoisie and the bourgeoisie.

Read More
1277 Words | 6 Pages

Marx believed that the current capitalist society is separated into two classes, the Proletariat society, and Bourgeois society. The Proletarians, as perceived by Marx, are part of the working class that only possess one significant material value, that is the ability to work, or labour power. The Bourgeoise, on the other hand, is the societal class that owns the means of production and hence rule over the Proletarians. As I quote from Marx’s book, “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” (Marx and Engels, 1988, p. 473)

Read More
1074 Words | 5 Pages

According to Edwards et al. (2006) Marx thought that within capitalism there would be an increased divide between the bourgeoisie class and the proletariat class in the future. The proletariats are lower of the two classes, the people who have to work for wages in order to survive. The bourgeoisie are the people in society who controlled and owned the means of production in a capitalist system.

Read More
1140 Words | 5 Pages

Capitalism, according to Karl Marx is divided into two major social classes: the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat. The Bourgeoisie, which is the minority of the class system, own the means of production such as land, machinery, factories and raw materials whereas the Proletariat, which is the majority of the class system, having no means of their own production and have to work to earn wage for a living. Karl Marx has his own theory that history is made up by class struggle which he mentioned in his book – Manifesto of the Communist Party: “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” (Marx and Engels, 1848) and had predicted that the Proletariat would lead a revolution to overthrow the Bourgeoisie. Karl Marx believed that there will be intrinsic conflict like exploitation, alienation of labour and commodity fetishism between both of the classes.

Read More
1443 Words | 6 Pages

Social classes are a form of social stratification that refers to the existence of structured inequalities between individuals and groups in society. A social class is a group of people of comparable status, power and wealth which are usually classified as upper class, middle class, and lower class. For each class, there are some specific opportunities available that influence their social life. We can understand about the particularity of the chances through unequal distribution of these opportunities between individuals in social classes. In here belonging to a social class seems to be an obstacle for some individuals to obtain equal opportunity, unlike upper class people.

Read More
1486 Words | 6 Pages

Class conflict, Marx believed, was what encouraged the evolution of society. To quote Marx himself, The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles. Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

Class struggle is a conflict in a particular society or between a society which is caused by the lack of unity in one society and different perspective of a different group in a society. It is also called class conflict or class warfare. One social issue of a class struggle is the social inequality. According to study.com, Social inequality is an inequity of social class, award, opportunities, religion, position in the community, social status and at some other point respect in a group of society.

Read More
1727 Words | 7 Pages

Conflict theory states that tensions and conflicts arise when resources, status, and power are unevenly distributed between groups in society and that these conflicts become the engine for social change. In this context, Marx’s conflict approach was developed in 19th century by Karl Marx (1818-83) .Marx argued wealth and power were unequally distributed in society and sought to explain how one minority group (1% ruling-class) in society maintained its dominance over the majority (working-class). Weber formulated a response to Marx’s theory. Weber saw that conflict didn’t overwhelmingly involve the economy, but that the state and economy together set up conditions for conflict. In this essay I will discuss the views of Conflict Theorists on

Read More

More about The Conflict Between Social Classes

Related Topics

Open Document