a. McCloskey argues that there is no proof of Gods existence and any thoughts or beliefs of the existence of God should be abandond. Gods existence is shown in everything, from the tiniest organisms to the tallest mountains. Whether one does not believe in the existence of God does not mean that a believer should abandon their beliefs in the existence of God. Granted, there are many scientific theories that try and and disprove the existence of God, like the evelotuionary theory or the big band theory. However, the term “theory” is merely and idea that is not based on facts. So to say believers of God should abandon their beleifs because there is no argument or fact the can prove of Gods existence, is saying to abandon the beliefs in the big bang theory or Darwin’s evelotionary theory because there is no proof or sound bases for that argument.
b. McCloskey states that the mere existence of the universe and the world do not give proof to Gods existence or why the universe is important to human life. I believe
…show more content…
McCloskey is right about having proof there must be genuine proof to prove your purpose. There is plenty of indisputable proof of the existence of God and all of creation. These proofs can be seen within the pages of the Bible which is inerent and so is God. Gods design is so flawless and so spot on it is hard to imagine how all of this was not created by a designer. This world would be to hard for even a computer program like the movie The Matrix.
e. The universe has to have a designer. The amount of stars, planets, and galaxies in the universe are to advance to have a blank void and then a big bang to create everything in existence. Each planet is so well designed with its own climate and atmosphere that a simple bang could not create. Another example on how the universe has a designer is that, if the universe was created by the big bang, like most things that have some sort of explosion always ends. However, as far as we know, the universe is