ipl-logo

Mccloskey: Proof Of The Existence Of God

1286 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Charles darwin theory of evolution in very simple words

a. McCloskey argues that there is no proof of Gods existence and any thoughts or beliefs of the existence of God should be abandond. Gods existence is shown in everything, from the tiniest organisms to the tallest mountains. Whether one does not believe in the existence of God does not mean that a believer should abandon their beliefs in the existence of God. Granted, there are many scientific theories that try and and disprove the existence of God, like the evelotuionary theory or the big band theory. However, the term “theory” is merely and idea that is not based on facts. So to say believers of God should abandon their beleifs because there is no argument or fact the can prove of Gods existence, is saying to abandon the beliefs in the big bang theory or Darwin’s evelotionary theory because there is no proof or sound bases for that argument.
b. McCloskey states that the mere existence of the universe and the world do not give proof to Gods existence or why the universe is important to human life. I believe …show more content…

McCloskey is right about having proof there must be genuine proof to prove your purpose. There is plenty of indisputable proof of the existence of God and all of creation. These proofs can be seen within the pages of the Bible which is inerent and so is God. Gods design is so flawless and so spot on it is hard to imagine how all of this was not created by a designer. This world would be to hard for even a computer program like the movie The Matrix.
e. The universe has to have a designer. The amount of stars, planets, and galaxies in the universe are to advance to have a blank void and then a big bang to create everything in existence. Each planet is so well designed with its own climate and atmosphere that a simple bang could not create. Another example on how the universe has a designer is that, if the universe was created by the big bang, like most things that have some sort of explosion always ends. However, as far as we know, the universe is

Show More
Related
120 Words | 1 Pages

On the teleological argument, McCloskey’s claim that “to get the proof going, genuine indisputable examples of design and purpose are needed” is not reasonable. Why does one side of the equation need examples and the other does not, is not a fair assessment of a problem. There should always be examples to prove that each side is disputable or undisputable for the premise. A person can assume that a statement is true but that does not make the argument true and in all fairness why would that argument be considered true without some type of proof. The teleological argument is to show probability of theism, exhibit purpose of order, design and infer that the cause must be an intelligent

Read More
378 Words | 2 Pages

For this disputation, I had the pleasure of arguing against the topic of be it resolved that you can convince a non-believer to affirm the existence of God using philosophical arguments. As the opposing side, Sarah and I counter argued the following: the argument from motion, the ontological argument, Pascal’s Wager, the cosmological argument, the teleological argument, and the moral argument. The argument from motion argues that it is only possible to experience that which exists, and people experience God, therefore God must exist; however it can be counter argued that since faith cannot be demonstrated or experienced, as it is unseen, God cannot exist.

Read More
656 Words | 3 Pages

Both sides of the God debate, for the existence of god and against the existence of god, made very compelling points. In my opinion the strongest point made by Dr. William Lane Craig, who was in favor of the existence of god, was the, “fine tuning” argument. The argument is basically that the laws of nature were made almost perfectly for humans and the universe to exist and being that way is so improbable that the universe must have been intelligently designed by a god rather than being because of physical necessity or chance. I thought this was the strongest point because he bolstered his argument with not only sound logic but also statistics. Dr. Austin Dacey attempted to rebut this point by saying science has yet to discover a fundamental theory to describe why certain laws of nature are fine tuned for human existence.

Read More
191 Words | 1 Pages

All of the philosophers that we've studied so far have made some valid arguments concerning the existence, or non-existence of God. If I had to be swayed by an opinion for God's existence, or non-existence it would have to be by William Paley's argument. Paley's analogy is strong because of his metaphor of the watch to explain the universe and the existence of an intelligent designer. The weak part of this analogy is that the watchmaker as evidence can be produced in the physical form; the universe maker as evidence cannot be produced in physical form.

Read More
1168 Words | 5 Pages

God 's existence has been a continuous debate certainly for centuries. The issue of God 's existence is debatable because of the different kind of controversies that can be raised from an "Atheist as being the non-believer of God" and a "Theist who is the believer of God". An atheist can raise different objections on the order of the universe by claiming that the science is a reason behind the perfection of the universe. In Aquinas 's fifth argument, he claims that the order of the universe cannot be explained by chance, but only by design and purpose. To explain this order of the universe he concludes that, there is an intelligent being whom we call "God".

Read More
1396 Words | 6 Pages

Empirical proof operates within the framework of the natural world, dealing with observable and measurable phenomena. It is primarily concerned with studying the physical realm and the relationships between various elements. Science, as the epitome of empirical inquiry, has achieved remarkable advancements in understanding the natural world through rigorous observation, experimentation, and the formulation of testable hypotheses. However, the application of empirical methods encounters challenges when it ventures into metaphysical domains. The existence of God, as a metaphysical concept, lies beyond the purview of direct observation and measurable evidence.

Read More
1770 Words | 8 Pages

I accept as true with Dawkins statements and do not forget them legitimate criticisms because a number of the notions in God have to do with blind faith without proof and medical evidence. In truth according to logician William L. Rowe, " within the popular experience, an agnostic is a person who neither believes nor disbelieves in God, while an atheist disbelieves in God. Within the strict experience, however, agnosticism is the view that human motive is incapable of providing sufficient rational grounds to justify either the notion that God exists or the notion that God does not exist. Up to now as one holds that our ideals are rational best if they may be sufficiently supported by using human motive, the person who accepts the philosophical role of agnosticism will keep that neither the notion that God exists nor the notion that God does not exist is rational '' (Rowe,1998). This grievance of christianity and the blind faith in the back of it as implied by using Dawkins and Rowe do keep

Read More
1074 Words | 5 Pages

There are two possibilities: either God exists or he does not. With these two possibilities comes with two relevant actions we can take. A person can believe or they can fail to

Read More
381 Words | 2 Pages

This is true because no observations and experiments can be done to find an answer to God’s existence. Furthermore, people that have a strong faith will not long for scientific answers in order to have believe in God. I cannot disagree with any of the arguments Lewis provides because they all acknowledge the existence of God and do not question God’s existence.

Read More
542 Words | 3 Pages

For the above objections, a proponent of Pascal 's Wager can refute in such way. For example, Pascal 's Wager is not a complete denial of evidence, but rather that it is not immoral to use practical reasoning without sufficient evidence. Pascal 's Wager has support of decision-making theory to a great extent. Anyway, according to Pascal 's Wager, betting on not believing God is impossible to win. There is a free invitation from God.

Read More
295 Words | 2 Pages

Under these options, one is free to follow his/her passionate nature and believe whatever one would like to believe. Concerning the existence of God, James thinks that belief in God’s existence is a valuable sort of

Read More
753 Words | 4 Pages

The argument for God’s existence is that God is a perfect being, he is infinite, independent, supremely intelligent, and supremely powerful. Descartes goes on to talk about how God exists because he can conceive of him as better than himself (AD 40). God is perfect and perfect at everything, and was the first thing that sent everything into motion (AD 45). God is the ultimate cause.

Read More
1876 Words | 8 Pages

Introduction: Professors Richard Dawkins and John Lennox go head to head in a battle to match their superior intellect. The debate was titled “Has Science Buried God?” Lennox also announced his new book “Gods Undertaker”. The John Lennox - Richard Dawkins Debate - bethinking.org. 2015

Read More
1444 Words | 6 Pages

There have been an innumerable amount of arguments for the existence of God for hundreds of years. Some have become much more popular due to their merit, and their ability to stay relevant through changing times. Two arguments in particular that have been discussed for a very long time are the ontological and cosmological arguments. Each were proposed in the period of the high middle ages by members of the Roman Catholic Church. They each have been used extensively by many since their introduction.

Read More
1784 Words | 8 Pages

As he goes into depth on his opinion of the existence of God with each point he gives and their explanations, it is clear to see that his “five ways” argument is persuasive and valid. With his helpful and insightful thinkings, it is evident that God does very much exist and is the all powerful being that created the universe around us. I also agree that this first cause argument on the cosmological argument is a sound argument and that God is the “something” outside the universe that is responsible to explain the existence of the

Read More

More about Mccloskey: Proof Of The Existence Of God

Related Topics

Open Document