Summary Of The Mccune Vs. Myrtle Beach Indoor Shooting Range Case

235 Words1 Pages
The McCune vs Myrtle Beach Indoor Shooting Range case contains much of accurate interpretations of the law when pertaining to contracts of adhesion. In this case, a defected mask allowed a paintball to hit Christine McCune’s eye. The effect of this event led McCune to become blind in one eye. There is no evidence suggesting that the employees knew of this malfunction. This case best describes the contracts of adhesion because there was not any gross negligence from the park. In the other cases, the actions seem to happen due to negligence from the providers. When the business tries to reduce the amount of injuries, the contract is protected. The employees in the McCune vs Myrtle Beach Indoor Shooting Range case, the employees tried to fix