Medicare Sociale Essay

1191 Words5 Pages

A Comparison of Medicare and Sécurité Sociale: Costs, Quality of Care, And Patient Outcomes
The implementation of the bulk-billing system in Australian Medicare has proved effective in ensuring affordable healthcare for all citizens, but with the increasing cost of providing healthcare and the drop in bulk-billing reimbursement rates, it is time for the Australian government to consider implementing a national health insurance policy similar to France’s Sécurité Sociale in order to improve access to healthcare services and reduce financial burden. The provision of universal healthcare is widely regarded as an indispensable public service, with nearly all developed nations having established some variation of universal or subsidized healthcare. …show more content…

France's Sécurité Sociale, implemented in 1946 in the aftermath of the Second World War, is the most prominent example of nationalized health insurance. Economists laud France’s system as it provides better outcomes for patients across a range of measures, despite being relatively inexpensive when compared to Australia's Medicare system (Duckett S., 2019). Sécurité Social differs from Medicare in both its funding and compensation, collecting most of its revenue from contributions from employees and employers of 7.9% of gross salary under a cut off €41,136 (AUD$66,148) annually as of 2021. In comparison, Medicare is funded by a 2% Medicare levy on taxable income and 2% from other taxes. However due to the lack of comprehensive coverage, 55% of Australians have private insurance, resulting Australia spending 34% more than France on insurance and subsidised healthcare. France's Sécurité Sociale provides better healthcare outcomes at a lower cost compared to Australia's Medicare system, making it a compelling example of a nationalized health insurance model that could benefit …show more content…

With comprehensive coverage, affordable costs, and higher quality of care, nationalized health insurance could address the shortcomings of the current system, which struggles to keep up with the increasing costs of healthcare. The French healthcare system provides a strong example of the success of nationalized insurance, with better patient outcomes and lower costs than Australia's current system. While there may be some drawbacks to nationalized insurance, such as limited choice and coverage for experimental treatments, the benefits of increased healthcare availability and lower out-of-pocket costs make it a compelling option for policymakers to